1. Comorbidity Assessment Is Uneven Across Veterans Health Administration and Medicare for the Same Patient: Implications for Risk Adjustment
- Author
-
Derek B. Boothroyd, Jack Needleman, Samantha Illarmo, Steven M. Asch, and Risha Gidwani-Marszowski
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coding algorithm ,MEDLINE ,Eligibility Determination ,Comorbidity ,Medicare ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Retrospective analysis ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Retrospective cohort study ,Risk adjustment ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Veterans health ,Privatization ,United States ,United States Department of Veterans Affairs ,Data extraction ,Emergency medicine ,Female ,Risk Adjustment ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
Objective Compare comorbidity identification in Medicare and Veterans Health Administration (VA) data for the purposes of risk adjustment. Data sources Analysis of Medicare and VA datasets for dually-enrolled Veterans receiving care in both settings, fiscal years 2010-2014. Study design A retrospective analysis of administrative data for a national sample of cancer decedents. Data extraction methods Comorbidities were evaluated using Elixhauser and Charlson coding algorithms. Principal findings Clinical comorbidities were more likely to be recorded in Medicare than in VA datasets. Of 42 comorbidities, 36 (86%) were recorded at a different frequency. For example, congestive heart failure was recorded for 22.0% of patients in Medicare data and for 11.3% of patients in VA data (P Conclusion There are large differences in comorbidity assessment across VA and Medicare administrative data for the same patient, posing challenges for risk adjustment.
- Published
- 2020