Search

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common neurological disorders. It affects mainly women. This autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) is characterized by intermittent or chronic damage to the myelin sheaths (demyelination), focal inflammation and axonal degeneration. During the early relapsing/remitting stages of MS, myelin can regenerate, but as the disease progresses the remyelination of axons becomes insufficient, leading to impaired axon conduction, neurodegeneration and the worsening of symptoms. The present pharmacological treatment of MS is limited to the administration of immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drugs, which are only palliative and do not significantly slow progress of the disease. What are needed are agents that target different cell types in the CNS to protect axonal networks and stimulate the endogenous capacity of myelin repair. Estrogens and progestins may be the basis for such a new therapeutic approach. Although clinical observations provide only indirect or insufficient evidence for an influence of sex steroids on the progress of MS, experimental studies have shown that estrogens and progestins exert multiple beneficial effects in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a widely used MS disease model. Moreover, both types of hormones have been shown to promote the viability of neurons and the formation of myelin. These promising experimental results should encourage the launch of prospective clinical studies to clarify the influence of hormones on the course of MS and the effect of hormone treatments, in particular those presently used in contraception and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

The synthetic progestins used so far for contraception and menopausal hormone therapy are derived either from testosterone (19-nortestosterone derivatives) or from progesterone (17-OH progesterone derivatives and 19-norprogesterone derivatives). Among the 19-nortestosterone derivatives, the estrane group include norethisterone (NET) and its metabolites, and the gonane group include levonorgestrel (LNG) and its derivatives. The later, including desogestrel (DSG) and its derivative etonogestrel, gestodene (GES) and norgestimate (norelgestromin), have been referred to as third-generation progestins. Several newprogestins have been synthesized in the last decade and may be considered as a fourth-generation of progestins. Dienogest is referred to as a hybrid progestin being derived from the estrane group with a 17α-cyanomethyl group, and drospirenone derives from spirolactone. These two progestins have no androgenic effect but a partial antiandrogenic effect. The later exerts anti-mineralocorticoid effects. This property leads to a decreased salt and water retention and a lowering in blood pressure in users of pills containing this progestin. The 19-norprogesterone derivatives appear more specifically progestational and do not possess any androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid activity. They are referred to as “pure” progestational molecules as they bind almost exclusively to the progesterone receptor (PR) and do not interfere with the other steroid receptor. This category includes, trimegestone, nomegestrol acetate and Nestorone® is not active orally but proved to be a potent anti-ovulatory agent when given in implants, vaginal rings or percutaneous gel. Non-androgenic progestins would appear neutral on metabolic factors and on the vessels and would have the advantage of avoiding acnea. Progestins with antiandrogenic properties may also be used for the treatment of women with preexisting androgen related conditions. The progestins available for therapy exhibit profound differences according to their structure or metabolites and it is inappropriate to consider the various effects of the old and new molecules as class-effects.

The trends in postmenopausal hormonal therapy (HT) seem to favor the non-oral delivery routes for both the estrogen and the progestin for women with an intact uterus. Targeting the lowest possible dose of the progestin or of the natural hormone progesterone to be delivered directly to the uterus, the target organ for which it is designed, would avoid the possible drawbacks of systemic effects of progestins on other targets. Several delivery systems are either available or in development including vaginal gels and vaginal rings delivering the physiological hormone progesterone or intrauterine systems delivering very low doses of levonorgestrel. In addition, transdermal gels and spray are under development and can deliver very low doses of Nestorone a 19-norprogesterone derivative, not active orally but with high progestational activity when given via non-oral routes. The assumption that these new delivery systems should lead to an improved risk/benefit ratio in HT will need to be demonstrated in larger randomized controlled studies.

The role of progestins (or progestagens) on the breast tissue remains controversial. However, according to the molecule and the duration of application, cell differentiation and apoptosis may predominate over proliferation. Progestins are also used as second-line agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In young women with benign breast disease, long-term treatment with 19-nortestosterone progestins had a trend to decrease breast cancer risk contrarily to what was observed in postmenopausal women receiving estrogens. Several compounds with progestational activity have been used for HRT. Small differences in the structure of the molecules may lead to pronounced differences in activities, some progestins exerting androgenic effects and some exerting estrogenic or glucocorticoid like activities. While most progestins do not bind to the estrogen receptors, it has been shown that some androgenic progestins stimulate MCF7 cells proliferation while progestins derived from progesterone did not induce cell multiplication in the same cell lines. Therefore, different progestins may induce different effects on the breast cells. Whether the progestins available to date are able to bind specifically to the progesterone receptors PR-A or PR-B and whether this is of clinical relevance to breast cell proliferation is still unclear. Although the relationship between progestin use and breast cancer risk is still the subject of debate and controversy, the data reported to date suggest that 5 years of treatment carry a low risk but further duration of use increases the risk. Further studies are still needed, randomised long-term prospective studies as well as from the laboratory, especially to determine whether a sequential or continuous regimen would be preferable as far as breast-cell response and apoptosis are concerned, and what are the effects of the various molecules used for HRT.

The synthetic progestins used so far for contraception and menopausal hormone therapy are derived either from testosterone (19-nortestosterone derivatives) or from progesterone (17-OH progesterone derivatives and 19-norprogesterone derivatives). Among the 19-nortestosterone derivatives, the estrane group include norethisterone (NET) and its metabolites, and the gonane group include levonorgestrel (LNG) and its derivatives. The later, including desogestrel (DSG) and its derivative etonogestrel, gestodene (GES) and norgestimate (norelgestromin), have been referred to as third-generation progestins. Several new progestins have been synthesized in the last decade and may be considered as a fourth-generation of progestins. Dienogest is referred to as a hybrid progestin being derived from the estrane group with a 17alpha-cyanomethyl group, and drospirenone derives from spirolactone. These two progestins have no androgenic effect but a partial antiandrogenic effect. The later exerts anti-mineralocorticoid effects. This property leads to a decreased salt and water retention and a lowering in blood pressure in users of pills containing this progestin. The 19-norprogesterone derivatives appear more specifically progestational and do not possess any androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid activity. They are referred to as "pure" progestational molecules as they bind almost exclusively to the progesterone receptor (PR) and do not interfere with the other steroid receptor. This category includes, trimegestone, nomegestrol acetate and Nestorone is not active orally but proved to be a potent anti-ovulatory agent when given in implants, vaginal rings or percutaneous gel. Non-androgenic progestins would appear neutral on metabolic factors and on the vessels and would have the advantage of avoiding acnea. Progestins with antiandrogenic properties may also be used for the treatment of women with preexisting androgen related conditions. The progestins available for therapy exhibit profound differences according to their structure or metabolites and it is inappropriate to consider the various effects of the old and new molecules as class-effects.

Seven postmenopausal women have been treated daily with 3 mg oestradiol percutaneously applied upon the skin. Blood samples were drawn at 8-h intervals during a 4-day period and on days 5, 7 and 9 from the beginning of the treatment. Plasma oestradiol (E2), oestrone (E1), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were determined by radioimmunoassay on these samples. The plasma E2 level was significantly increased at the 12th hour (73 ± 17 pg/ml) but the maximal plasma concentration was obtained only at the third day of treatment (110 ± 24 pg/ml). Thereafter the mean plasma concentration was more stable. Increments in E1 were smaller and the plasma E2 E1 ratio was 1.51. Plasma FSH and LH did not change significantly during the course of the treatment. Thus the percutaneous administration of E2 appears to be an effective and safe method of delivering E2 into the circulation, and mimicking the physiologic condition. The advantages of this method are discussed.