Search

We propose a version of the bundle scheme for convex nondifferentiable optimization suitable for the case of a sum-function where some of the components are 'easy', that is, they are Lagrangian functions of explicitly known compact convex programs. This corresponds to a stabilized partial Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition, where suitably modified representations of the 'easy' convex subproblems are inserted in the master problem as an alternative to iteratively inner-approximating them by extreme points, thus providing the algorithm with exact information about a part of the dual objective function. The resulting master problems are potentially larger and less well-structured than the standard ones, ruling out the available specialized techniques and requiring the use of general-purpose solvers for their solution; this strongly favors piecewise-linear stabilizing terms, as opposed to the more usual quadratic ones, which in turn may have an adverse effect on the convergence speed of the algorithm, so that the overall performance may depend on appropriate tuning of all these aspects. Yet, very good computational results are obtained in at least one relevant application: the computation of tight lower bounds for Fixed-Charge Multicommodity Min-Cost Flow problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We discuss an algorithmic scheme, which we call the stabilized structured Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition method, for solving large-scale structured linear programs. It can be applied when the subproblem of the standard Dantzig-Wolfe approach admits an alternative master model amenable to column generation, other than the standard one in which there is a variable for each of the extreme points and extreme rays of the corresponding polyhedron. Stabilization is achieved by the same techniques developed for the standard Dantzig-Wolfe approach and it is equally useful to improve the performance, as shown by computational results obtained on an application to the multicommodity capacitated network design problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the foremost difficulties in solving Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs, either with exact or heuristic methods, is to find a feasible point. We address this issue with a new feasibility pump algorithm tailored for nonconvex Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs. Feasibility pumps are algorithms that iterate between solving a continuous relaxation and a mixed-integer relaxation of the original problems. Such approaches currently exist in the literature for Mixed-Integer Linear Programs and convex Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs: both cases exhibit the distinctive property that the continuous relaxation can be solved in polynomial time. In nonconvex Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming such a property does not hold, and therefore special care has to be exercised in order to allow feasibility pump algorithms to rely only on local optima of the continuous relaxation. Based on a new, high level view of feasibility pump algorithms as a special case of the well-known successive projection method, we show that many possible different variants of the approach can be developed, depending on how several different (orthogonal) implementation choices are taken. A remarkable twist of feasibility pump algorithms is that, unlike most previous successive projection methods from the literature, projection is 'naturally' taken in two different norms in the two different subproblems. To cope with this issue while retaining the local convergence properties of standard successive projection methods we propose the introduction of appropriate norm constraints in the subproblems; these actually seem to significantly improve the practical performance of the approach. We present extensive computational results on the MINLPLib, showing the effectiveness and efficiency of our algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]