Search

Following the breakthrough work of Tardos (Oper Res 34:250–256, 1986) in the bit-complexity model, Vavasis and Ye (Math Program 74(1):79–120, 1996) gave the first exact algorithm for linear programming in the real model of computation with running time depending only on the constraint matrix. For solving a linear program (LP) $$\max \, c^\top x,\, Ax = b,\, x \ge 0,\, A \in \mathbb {R}^{m \times n}$$ max c ⊤ x , A x = b , x ≥ 0 , A ∈ R m × n , Vavasis and Ye developed a primal-dual interior point method using a ‘layered least squares’ (LLS) step, and showed that $$O(n^{3.5} \log (\bar{\chi }_A+n))$$ O ( n 3.5 log ( χ ¯ A + n ) ) iterations suffice to solve (LP) exactly, where $$\bar{\chi }_A$$ χ ¯ A is a condition measure controlling the size of solutions to linear systems related to A. Monteiro and Tsuchiya (SIAM J Optim 13(4):1054–1079, 2003), noting that the central path is invariant under rescalings of the columns of A and c, asked whether there exists an LP algorithm depending instead on the measure $$\bar{\chi }^*_A$$ χ ¯ A ∗ , defined as the minimum $$\bar{\chi }_{AD}$$ χ ¯ AD value achievable by a column rescaling AD of A, and gave strong evidence that this should be the case. We resolve this open question affirmatively. Our first main contribution is an $$O(m^2 n^2 + n^3)$$ O ( m 2 n 2 + n 3 ) time algorithm which works on the linear matroid of A to compute a nearly optimal diagonal rescaling D satisfying $$\bar{\chi }_{AD} \le n(\bar{\chi }_A^*)^3$$ χ ¯ AD ≤ n ( χ ¯ A ∗ ) 3 . This algorithm also allows us to approximate the value of $$\bar{\chi }_A$$ χ ¯ A up to a factor $$n (\bar{\chi }_A^*)^2$$ n ( χ ¯ A ∗ ) 2 . This result is in surprising contrast to that of Tunçel (Math Program 86(1):219–223, 1999), who showed NP-hardness for approximating $$\bar{\chi }_A$$ χ ¯ A to within $$2^{\textrm{poly}(\textrm{rank}(A))}$$ 2 poly ( rank ( A ) ) . The key insight for our algorithm is to work with ratios $$g_i/g_j$$ g i / g j of circuits of A—i.e., minimal linear dependencies $$Ag=0$$ A g = 0 —which allow us to approximate the value of $$\bar{\chi }_A^*$$ χ ¯ A ∗ by a maximum geometric mean cycle computation in what we call the ‘circuit ratio digraph’ of A. While this resolves Monteiro and Tsuchiya’s question by appropriate preprocessing, it falls short of providing either a truly scaling invariant algorithm or an improvement upon the base LLS analysis. In this vein, as our second main contribution we develop a scaling invariant LLS algorithm, which uses and dynamically maintains improving estimates of the circuit ratio digraph, together with a refined potential function based analysis for LLS algorithms in general. With this analysis, we derive an improved $$O(n^{2.5} \log (n)\log (\bar{\chi }^*_A+n))$$ O ( n 2.5 log ( n ) log ( χ ¯ A ∗ + n ) ) iteration bound for optimally solving (LP) using our algorithm. The same argument also yields a factor $$n/\log n$$ n / log n improvement on the iteration complexity bound of the original Vavasis–Ye algorithm.

The notion of best approximation mapping (BAM) with respect to a closed affine subspace in finite-dimensional space was introduced by Behling, Bello Cruz and Santos to show the linear convergence of the block-wise circumcentered-reflection method. The best approximation mapping possesses two critical properties of the circumcenter mapping for linear convergence. Because the iteration sequence of BAM linearly converges, the BAM is interesting in its own right. In this paper, we naturally extend the definition of BAM from closed affine subspace to nonempty closed convex set and from $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ to general Hilbert space. We discover that the convex set associated with the BAM must be the fixed point set of the BAM. Hence, the iteration sequence generated by a BAM linearly converges to the nearest fixed point of the BAM. Connections between BAMs and other mappings generating convergent iteration sequences are considered. Behling et al.\ proved that the finite composition of BAMs associated with closed affine subspaces is still a BAM in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$. We generalize their result from $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ to general Hilbert space and also construct a new constant associated with the composition of BAMs. This provides a new proof of the linear convergence of the method of alternating projections. Moreover, compositions of BAMs associated with general convex sets are investigated. In addition, we show that convex combinations of BAMs associated with affine subspaces are BAMs. Last but not least, we connect BAM with circumcenter mapping in Hilbert spaces., 31 pages and 2 figures

Gradient-based optimization algorithms can be studied from the perspective of limiting ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Motivated by the fact that existing ODEs do not distinguish between two fundamentally different algorithms---Nesterov's accelerated gradient method for strongly convex functions (NAG-SC) and Polyak's heavy-ball method---we study an alternative limiting process that yields high-resolution ODEs. We show that these ODEs permit a general Lyapunov function framework for the analysis of convergence in both continuous and discrete time. We also show that these ODEs are more accurate surrogates for the underlying algorithms; in particular, they not only distinguish between NAG-SC and Polyak's heavy-ball method, but they allow the identification of a term that we refer to as "gradient correction" that is present in NAG-SC but not in the heavy-ball method and is responsible for the qualitative difference in convergence of the two methods. We also use the high-resolution ODE framework to study Nesterov's accelerated gradient method for (non-strongly) convex functions, uncovering a hitherto unknown result---that NAG-C minimizes the squared gradient norm at an inverse cubic rate. Finally, by modifying the high-resolution ODE of NAG-C, we obtain a family of new optimization methods that are shown to maintain the accelerated convergence rates of NAG-C for smooth convex functions., 82 pages, 11 figures

We address the problem of prescribing an optimal decision in a framework where the cost function depends on uncertain problem parameters that need to be learned from data. Earlier work proposed prescriptive formulations based on supervised machine learning methods. These prescriptive methods can factor in contextual information on a potentially large number of covariates to take context specific actions which are superior to any static decision. When working with noisy or corrupt data, however, such nominal prescriptive methods can be prone to adverse overfitting phenomena and fail to generalize on out-of-sample data. In this paper we combine ideas from robust optimization and the statistical bootstrap to propose novel prescriptive methods which safeguard against overfitting. We show indeed that a particular entropic robust counterpart to such nominal formulations guarantees good performance on synthetic bootstrap data. As bootstrap data is often a sensible proxy to actual out-of-sample data, our robust counterpart can be interpreted to directly encourage good out-of-sample performance. The associated robust prescriptive methods furthermore reduce to convenient tractable convex optimization problems in the context of local learning methods such as nearest neighbors and Nadaraya-Watson learning. We illustrate our data-driven decision-making framework and our novel robustness notion on a small newsvendor problem.

Wasserstein balls, which contain all probability measures within a pre-specified Wasserstein distance to a reference measure, have recently enjoyed wide popularity in the distributionally robust optimization and machine learning communities to formulate and solve data-driven optimization problems with rigorous statistical guarantees. In this technical note we prove that the Wasserstein ball is weakly compact under mild conditions, and we offer necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of optimal solutions. We also characterize the sparsity of solutions if the Wasserstein ball is centred at a discrete reference measure. In comparison with the existing literature, which has proved similar results under different conditions, our proofs are self-contained and shorter, yet mathematically rigorous, and our necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of optimal solutions are easily verifiable in practice.

Many iterative methods in applied mathematics can be thought of as fixed-point iterations, and such algorithms are usually analyzed analytically, with inequalities. In this paper, we present a geometric approach to analyzing contractive and nonexpansive fixed point iterations with a new tool called the scaled relative graph (SRG). The SRG provides a correspondence between nonlinear operators and subsets of the 2D plane. Under this framework, a geometric argument in the 2D plane becomes a rigorous proof of convergence., Published in Mathematical Programming

We consider mixed-integer optimal control problems with combinatorial constraints that couple over time such as minimum dwell times. We analyze a lifting and decomposition approach into a mixed-integer optimal control problem without combinatorial constraints and a mixed-integer problem for the combinatorial constraints in the control space. Both problems can be solved very efficiently with existing methods such as outer convexification with sum-up-rounding strategies and mixed-integer linear programming techniques. The coupling is handled using a penalty-approach. We provide an exactness result for the penalty which yields a solution approach that convergences to partial minima. We compare the quality of these dedicated points with those of other heuristics amongst an academic example and also for the optimization of electric transmission lines with switching of the network topology for flow reallocation in order to satisfy demands.

This paper discusses an outer-approximation guided optimization method for constrained neural network inverse problems with rectified linear units. The constrained neural network inverse problems refer to an optimization problem to find the best set of input values of a given trained neural network in order to produce a predefined desired output in presence of constraints on input values. This paper analyzes the characteristics of optimal solutions of neural network inverse problems with rectified activation units and proposes an outer-approximation algorithm by exploiting their characteristics. The proposed outer-approximation guided optimization comprises primal and dual phases. The primal phase incorporates neighbor curvatures with neighbor outer-approximations to expedite the process. The dual phase identifies and utilizes the structure of local convex regions to improve the convergence to a local optimal solution. At last, computation experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm compared to a projected gradient method.

In a first contribution, we revisit two certificates of positivity on (possibly non-compact) basic semialgebraic sets due to Putinar and Vasilescu [Comptes Rendus de l'Acad\'emie des Sciences-Series I-Mathematics, 328(6) (1999) pp. 495-499]. We use Jacobi's technique from [Mathematische Zeitschrift, 237(2) (2001) pp. 259-273] to provide an alternative proof with an effective degree bound on the sums of squares multipliers in such certificates. As a consequence, it allows one to define a hierarchy of semidefinite relaxations for a general polynomial optimization problem. Convergence of this hierarchy to a neighborhood of the optimal value as well as strong duality and analysis are guaranteed. In a second contribution, we introduce a new numerical method for solving systems of polynomial inequalities and equalities with possibly uncountably many solutions. As a bonus, one may apply this method to obtain approximate global optimizers in polynomial optimization., Comment: 33 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables

We propose finitely convergent methods for solving convex feasibility problems defined over a possibly infinite pool of constraints. Following other works in this area, we assume that the interior of the solution set is nonempty and that certain overrelaxation parameters form a divergent series. We combine our methods with a very general class of deterministic control sequences where, roughly speaking, we require that sooner or later we encounter a violated constraint if one exists. This requirement is satisfied, in particular, by the cyclic, repetitive and remotest set controls. Moreover, it is almost surely satisfied for random controls.

This paper studies data-driven distributionally robust bottleneck combinatorial problems (DRBCP) with stochastic costs, where the probability distribution of the cost vector is contained in a ball of distributions centered at the empirical distribution specified by the Wasserstein distance. We study two distinct versions of DRBCP from different applications: (i) Motivated by the multi-hop wireless network application, we first study the uncertainty quantification of DRBCP (denoted by DRBCP-U), where decision-makers would like to have an accurate estimation of the worst-case value of DRBCP. The difficulty of DRBCP-U is to handle its max-min-max form. Fortunately, the alternative forms of the bottleneck combinatorial problems from their blockers allow us to derive equivalent deterministic reformulations, which can be computed via mixed-integer programs. In addition, by drawing the connection between DRBCP-U and its sampling average approximation counterpart under empirical distribution, we show that the Wasserstein radius can be chosen in the order of negative square root of sample size, improving the existing known results; and (ii) Next, motivated by the ride-sharing application, decision-makers choose the best service-and-passenger matching that minimizes the unfairness. This gives rise to the decision-making DRBCP (denoted by DRBCP-D). For DRBCP-D, we show that its optimal solution is also optimal to its sampling average approximation counterpart, and the Wasserstein radius can be chosen in a similar order as DRBCP-U. When the sample size is small, we propose to use the optimal value of DRBCP-D to construct an indifferent solution space and propose an alternative decision-robust model, which finds the best indifferent solution to minimize the empirical variance. We further show that the decision robust model can be recast as a mixed-integer program., 32 pages, 4 figures

The network reconfiguration problem seeks to find a rooted tree $T$ such that the energy of the (unique) feasible electrical flow over $T$ is minimized. The tree requirement on the support of the flow is motivated by operational constraints in electricity distribution networks. The bulk of existing results on convex optimization over vertices of polytopes and on the structure of electrical flows do not easily give guarantees for this problem, while many heuristic methods have been developed in the power systems community as early as 1989. Our main contribution is to give the first provable approximation guarantees for the network reconfiguration problem. We provide novel lower bounds and corresponding approximation factors for various settings ranging from $\min\{O(m-n), O(n)\}$ for general graphs, to $O(\sqrt{n})$ over grids with uniform resistances on edges, and $O(1)$ for grids with uniform edge resistances and demands. To obtain the result for general graphs, we propose a new method for (approximate) spectral graph sparsification, which may be of independent interest. Using insights from our theoretical results, we propose a general heuristic for the network reconfiguration problem that is orders of magnitude faster than existing methods in the literature, while obtaining comparable performance., 37 pages, 11 figures

Using polarity, we give an outer polyhedral approximation for the epigraph of set functions. For a submodular function, we prove that the corresponding polar relaxation is exact; hence, it is equivalent to the Lov\'asz extension. The polar approach provides an alternative proof for the convex hull description of the epigraph of a submodular function. Computational experiments show that the inequalities from outer approximations can be effective as cutting planes for solving submodular as well as non-submodular set function minimization problems.

The Nemhauser-Trotter theorem states that the standard linear programming (LP) formulation for the stable set problem has a remarkable property, also known as (weak) persistency: for every optimal LP solution that assigns integer values to some variables, there exists an optimal integer solution in which these variables retain the same values. While the standard LP is defined by only non-negativity and edge constraints, a variety of other LP formulations have been studied and one may wonder whether any of them has this property as well. We show that any other formulation that satisfies mild conditions cannot have the persistency property on all graphs, unless it is always equal to the stable set polytope., Comment: 17 pages, 6 figures

International audience; The maximum-entropy sampling problem is a fundamental and challenging combinatorial-optimization problem, with application in spatial statistics. It asks to find a maximum-determinant order-$s$ principal submatrix of an order-$n$ covariance matrix. Exact solution methods for this NP-hard problem are based on a branch-and-bound framework. Many of the known upper bounds for the optimal value are based on convex optimization. We present a methodology for "mixing" these bounds to achieve better bounds.

We show that, if $\mathbf{W} \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}_{\mathsf{sym}}$ is drawn from the gaussian orthogonal ensemble, then with high probability the degree 4 sum-of-squares relaxation cannot certify an upper bound on the objective $N^{-1} \cdot \mathbf{x}^\top \mathbf{W} \mathbf{x}$ under the constraints $x_i^2 - 1 = 0$ (i.e. $\mathbf{x} \in \{ \pm 1 \}^N$) that is asymptotically smaller than $\lambda_{\max}(\mathbf{W}) \approx 2$. We also conjecture a proof technique for lower bounds against sum-of-squares relaxations of any degree held constant as $N \to \infty$, by proposing an approximate pseudomoment construction., Comment: 34 pages. Minor text revisions; closest to published version to appear in Mathematical Programming

We consider the generalized trust region subproblem (GTRS) of minimizing a nonconvex quadratic objective over a nonconvex quadratic constraint. A lifting of this problem recasts the GTRS as minimizing a linear objective subject to two nonconvex quadratic constraints. Our first main contribution is structural: we give an explicit description of the convex hull of this nonconvex set in terms of the generalized eigenvalues of an associated matrix pencil. This result may be of interest in building relaxations for nonconvex quadratic programs. Moreover, this result allows us to reformulate the GTRS as the minimization of two convex quadratic functions in the original space. Our next set of contributions is algorithmic: we present an algorithm for solving the GTRS up to an $$\epsilon $$ additive error based on this reformulation. We carefully handle numerical issues that arise from inexact generalized eigenvalue and eigenvector computations and establish explicit running time guarantees for these algorithms. Notably, our algorithms run in linear (in the size of the input) time. Furthermore, our algorithm for computing an $$\epsilon $$ -optimal solution has a slightly-improved running time dependence on $$\epsilon $$ over the state-of-the-art algorithm. Our analysis shows that the dominant cost in solving the GTRS lies in solving a generalized eigenvalue problem—establishing a natural connection between these problems. Finally, generalizations of our convex hull results allow us to apply our algorithms and their theoretical guarantees directly to equality-, interval-, and hollow-constrained variants of the GTRS. This gives the first linear-time algorithm in the literature for these variants of the GTRS.

Stochastic dual dynamic programming is a cutting plane type algorithm for multi-stage stochastic optimization originated about 30 years ago. In spite of its popularity in practice, there does not exist any analysis on the convergence rates of this method. In this paper, we first establish the number of iterations, i.e., iteration complexity, required by a basic dual dynamic programming method for solving single-scenario multi-stage optimization problems, by introducing novel mathematical tools including the saturation of search points. We then refine these basic tools and establish the iteration complexity for an explorative dual dynamic programing method proposed herein and the classic stochastic dual dynamic programming method for solving more general multi-stage stochastic optimization problems under the standard stage-wise independence assumption. Our results indicate that the complexity of these methods mildly increases with the number of stages T, in fact linearly dependent on T for discounted problems. Therefore, they are efficient for strategic decision making which involves a large number of stages, but with a relatively small number of decision variables in each stage. Without explicitly discretizing the state and action spaces, these methods might also be pertinent to the related reinforcement learning and stochastic control areas.

A key ingredient in branch and bound (B&B) solvers for mixed-integer programming (MIP) is the selection of branching variables since poor or arbitrary selection can affect the size of the resulting search trees by orders of magnitude. A recent article by Le Bodic and Nemhauser [Mathematical Programming, (2017)] investigated variable selection rules by developing a theoretical model of B&B trees from which they developed some new, effective scoring functions for MIP solvers. In their work, Le Bodic and Nemhauser left several open theoretical problems, solutions to which could guide the future design of variable selection rules. In this article, we first solve many of these open theoretical problems. We then implement an improved version of the model-based branching rules in SCIP 6.0, a state-of-the-art academic MIP solver, in which we observe an 11% geometric average time and node reduction on instances of the MIPLIB 2017 Benchmark Set that require large B&B trees.

This paper develops new extremal principles of variational analysis that are motivated by applications to constrained problems of stochastic programming and semi-infinite programming without smoothness and/or convexity assumptions. These extremal principles concern measurable set-valued mappings/multifunctions with values in finite-dimensional spaces and are established in both approximate and exact forms. The obtained principles are instrumental to derive via variational approaches integral representations and upper estimates of regular and limiting normals cones to essential intersections of sets defined by measurable multifunctions, which are in turn crucial for novel applications to stochastic and semi-infinite programming., Comment: 26 pages

The correspondence between the monotonicity of a (possibly) set-valued operator and the firm nonexpansiveness of its resolvent is a key ingredient in the convergence analysis of many optimization algorithms. Firmly nonexpansive operators form a proper subclass of the more general - but still pleasant from an algorithmic perspective - class of averaged operators. In this paper, we introduce the new notion of conically nonexpansive operators which generalize nonexpansive mappings. We characterize averaged operators as being resolvents of comonotone operators under appropriate scaling. As a consequence, we characterize the proximal point mappings associated with hypoconvex functions as cocoercive operators, or equivalently; as displacement mappings of conically nonexpansive operators. Several examples illustrate our analysis and demonstrate tightness of our results.

A strategy is proposed for characterizing the worst-case performance of algorithms for solving nonconvex smooth optimization problems. Contemporary analyses characterize worst-case performance by providing, under certain assumptions on an objective function, an upper bound on the number of iterations (or function or derivative evaluations) required until a pth-order stationarity condition is approximately satisfied. This arguably leads to conservative characterizations based on anomalous objectives rather than on ones that are typically encountered in practice. By contrast, the strategy proposed in this paper characterizes worst-case performance separately over regions comprising a search space. These regions are defined generically based on properties of derivative values. In this manner, one can analyze the worst-case performance of an algorithm independently from any particular class of objectives. Then, once given a class of objectives, one can obtain an informative, fine-tuned complexity analysis merely by delineating the types of regions that comprise the search spaces for functions in the class. Regions defined by first- and second-order derivatives are discussed in detail and example complexity analyses are provided for a few fundamental first- and second-order algorithms when employed to minimize convex and nonconvex objectives of interest. It is also explained how the strategy can be generalized to regions defined by higher-order derivatives and for analyzing the behavior of higher-order algorithms.

We study the convergence rate of a hierarchy of upper bounds for polynomial minimization problems, proposed by Lasserre [SIAM J. Optim. 21(3) (2011), pp. 864-885], for the special case when the feasible set is the unit (hyper)sphere. The upper bound at level r of the hierarchy is defined as the minimal expected value of the polynomial over all probability distributions on the sphere, when the probability density function is a sum-of-squares polynomial of degree at most 2r with respect to the surface measure. We show that the exact rate of convergence is Theta(1/r^2), and explore the implications for the related rate of convergence for the generalized problem of moments on the sphere., 14 pages, 2 figures

We provide a framework for obtaining error bounds for linear conic problems without assuming constraint qualifications or regularity conditions. The key aspects of our approach are the notions of amenable cones and facial residual functions. For amenable cones, it is shown that error bounds can be expressed as a composition of facial residual functions. The number of compositions is related to the facial reduction technique and the singularity degree of the problem. In particular, we show that symmetric cones are amenable and compute facial residual functions. From that, we are able to furnish a new H\"olderian error bound, thus extending and shedding new light on an earlier result by Sturm on semidefinite matrices. We also provide error bounds for the intersection of amenable cones, this will be used to provided error bounds for the doubly nonnegative cone., Comment: 36 pages, 1 figure. This version was significantly revised. A discussion on the relation between amenability and related concepts was added. In particular, there is a proof that amenable cones are nice and, therefore, facially exposed. Also, gathered the results on symmetric cones in a single section. Several typos and minor issues were fixed

We consider coordinate descent (CD) methods with exact line search on convex quadratic problems. Our main focus is to study the performance of the CD method that use random permutations in each epoch and compare it to the performance of the CD methods that use deterministic orders and random sampling with replacement. We focus on a class of convex quadratic problems with a diagonally dominant Hessian matrix, for which we show that using random permutations instead of random with-replacement sampling improves the performance of the CD method in the worst-case. Furthermore, we prove that as the Hessian matrix becomes more diagonally dominant, the performance improvement attained by using random permutations increases. We also show that for this problem class, using any fixed deterministic order yields a superior performance than using random permutations. We present detailed theoretical analyses with respect to three different convergence criteria that are used in the literature and support our theoretical results with numerical experiments.

We establish lower bounds on the complexity of finding $$\epsilon $$ -stationary points of smooth, non-convex high-dimensional functions using first-order methods. We prove that deterministic first-order methods, even applied to arbitrarily smooth functions, cannot achieve convergence rates in $$\epsilon $$ better than $$\epsilon ^{-8/5}$$ , which is within $$\epsilon ^{-1/15}\log \frac{1}{\epsilon }$$ of the best known rate for such methods. Moreover, for functions with Lipschitz first and second derivatives, we prove that no deterministic first-order method can achieve convergence rates better than $$\epsilon ^{-12/7}$$ , while $$\epsilon ^{-2}$$ is a lower bound for functions with only Lipschitz gradient. For convex functions with Lipschitz gradient, accelerated gradient descent achieves a better rate, showing that finding stationary points is easier given convexity.

Given $${\mathbf {X}}\subset {\mathbb {R}}^n$$ , $$\varepsilon \in (0,1)$$ , a parametrized family of probability distributions $$(\mu _{{\mathbf {a}}})_{{\mathbf {a}}\in {\mathbf {A}}}$$ on $${\varvec{\Omega }}\subset {\mathbb {R}}^p$$ , we consider the feasible set $${\mathbf {X}}^*_\varepsilon \subset {\mathbf {X}}$$ associated with the distributionally robust chance-constraint $$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {X}}^*_\varepsilon \,=\,\{{\mathbf {x}}\in {\mathbf {X}}:\,\mathrm{Prob}_\mu [f({\mathbf {x}},{\omega })\,>\,0]> 1-\varepsilon ,\,\forall \mu \in {\mathscr {M}}_{\mathbf {a}}\}, \end{aligned}$$ where $${\mathscr {M}}_{\mathbf {a}}$$ is the set of all possibles mixtures of distributions $$\mu _{\mathbf {a}}$$ , $${\mathbf {a}}\in {\mathbf {A}}$$ . For instance and typically, the family $${\mathscr {M}}_{\mathbf {a}}$$ is the set of all mixtures of Gaussian distributions on $${\mathbb {R}}$$ with mean and standard deviation $${\mathbf {a}}=(a,\sigma )$$ in some compact set $${\mathbf {A}}\subset {\mathbb {R}}^2$$ . We provide a sequence of inner approximations $${\mathbf {X}}^d_\varepsilon =\{{\mathbf {x}}\in {\mathbf {X}}:w_d({\mathbf {x}})

Augmented Lagrangian method (ALM) has been popularly used for solving constrained optimization problems. Practically, subproblems for updating primal variables in the framework of ALM usually can only be solved inexactly. The convergence and local convergence speed of ALM have been extensively studied. However, the global convergence rate of inexact ALM is still open for problems with nonlinear inequality constraints. In this paper, we work on general convex programs with both equality and inequality constraints. For these problems, we establish the global convergence rate of inexact ALM and estimate its iteration complexity in terms of the number of gradient evaluations to produce a solution with a specified accuracy. We first establish an ergodic convergence rate result of inexact ALM that uses constant penalty parameters or geometrically increasing penalty parameters. Based on the convergence rate result, we apply Nesterov's optimal first-order method on each primal subproblem and estimate the iteration complexity of the inexact ALM. We show that if the objective is convex, then $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$ gradient evaluations are sufficient to guarantee an $\varepsilon$-optimal solution in terms of both primal objective and feasibility violation. If the objective is strongly convex, the result can be improved to $O(\varepsilon^{-\frac{1}{2}}|\log\varepsilon|)$. Finally, by relating to the inexact proximal point algorithm, we establish a nonergodic convergence rate result of inexact ALM that uses geometrically increasing penalty parameters. We show that the nonergodic iteration complexity result is in the same order as that for the ergodic result. Numerical experiments on quadratically constrained quadratic programming are conducted to compare the performance of the inexact ALM with different settings., Iteration complexity results are significantly improved. Nonergodic convergence rate result is established for the inexact ALM, and numerical results are added

The article of record as published may be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-019-01413-z Upper semicontinuous (usc) functions arise in the analysis of maximization problems, distributionally robust optimization, and function identification, which includes many problems of nonparametric statistics. We establish that every usc function is the limit of a hypo-converging sequence of piecewise affine functions of the difference-of-max type and illustrate resulting algorithmic possibilities in the context of approximate solution of infinite-dimensional optimization problems. In an effort to quantify the ease with which classes of usc functions can be approximated by finite collections, we provide upper and lower bounds on covering numbers for bounded sets of usc functions under the Attouch-Wets distance. The result is applied in the context of stochastic optimization problems defined over spaces of usc functions. We establish confidence regions for optimal solutions based on sample average approximations and examine the accompanying rates of convergence. Examples from nonparametric statistics illustrate the results. This work in supported in parts by DARPA under Grants HR0011-14-1-0060 and HR0011-8-34187, and Office of Naval Research (Science of Autonomy Program) under Grant N00014- 17-1-2372. This work in supported in parts by DARPA under Grants HR0011-14-1-0060 and HR0011-8-34187, and Office of Naval Research (Science of Autonomy Program) under Grant N00014- 17-1-2372.

We prove that unless P=NP, there exists no polynomial time (or even pseudo-polynomial time) algorithm that can test whether the optimal value of a nonlinear optimization problem where the objective and constraints are given by low-degree polynomials is attained. If the degrees of these polynomials are fixed, our results along with previously-known "Frank-Wolfe type" theorems imply that exactly one of two cases can occur: either the optimal value is attained on every instance, or it is strongly NP-hard to distinguish attainment from non-attainment. We also show that testing for some well-known sufficient conditions for attainment of the optimal value, such as coercivity of the objective function and closedness and boundedness of the feasible set, is strongly NP-hard. As a byproduct, our proofs imply that testing the Archimedean property of a quadratic module is strongly NP-hard, a property that is of independent interest to the convergence of the Lasserre hierarchy. Finally, we give semidefinite programming (SDP)-based sufficient conditions for attainment of the optimal value, in particular a new characterization of coercive polynomials that lends itself to an SDP hierarchy., Comment: 18 pages

We prove lower bounds on the complexity of finding $$\epsilon $$ -stationary points (points x such that $$\Vert \nabla f(x)\Vert \le \epsilon $$ ) of smooth, high-dimensional, and potentially non-convex functions f. We consider oracle-based complexity measures, where an algorithm is given access to the value and all derivatives of f at a query point x. We show that for any (potentially randomized) algorithm $$\mathsf {A}$$ , there exists a function f with Lipschitz pth order derivatives such that $$\mathsf {A}$$ requires at least $$\epsilon ^{-(p+1)/p}$$ queries to find an $$\epsilon $$ -stationary point. Our lower bounds are sharp to within constants, and they show that gradient descent, cubic-regularized Newton’s method, and generalized pth order regularization are worst-case optimal within their natural function classes.

Consider the classical problem of solving a general linear system of equations $$Ax=b$$ . It is well known that the (successively over relaxed) Gauss–Seidel scheme and many of its variants may not converge when A is neither diagonally dominant nor symmetric positive definite. Can we have a linearly convergent G–S type algorithm that works for anyA? In this paper we answer this question affirmatively by proposing a doubly stochastic G–S algorithm that is provably linearly convergent (in the mean square error sense) for any feasible linear system of equations. The key in the algorithm design is to introduce a nonuniform double stochastic scheme for picking the equation and the variable in each update step as well as a stepsize rule. These techniques also generalize to certain iterative alternating projection algorithms for solving the linear feasibility problem $$A x\le b$$ with an arbitrary A, as well as high-dimensional minimization problems for training over-parameterized models in machine learning. Our results demonstrate that a carefully designed randomization scheme can make an otherwise divergent G–S algorithm converge.

We propose a new method for simplifying semidefinite programs (SDP) inspired by symmetry reduction. Specifically, we show if an orthogonal projection map satisfies certain invariance conditions, restricting to its range yields an equivalent primal-dual pair over a lower-dimensional symmetric cone---namely, the cone-of-squares of a Jordan subalgebra of symmetric matrices. We present a simple algorithm for minimizing the rank of this projection and hence the dimension of this subalgebra. We also show that minimizing rank optimizes the direct-sum decomposition of the algebra into simple ideals, yielding an optimal "block-diagonalization" of the SDP. Finally, we give combinatorial versions of our algorithm that execute at reduced computational cost and illustrate effectiveness of an implementation on examples. Through the theory of Jordan algebras, the proposed method easily extends to linear and second-order-cone programming and, more generally, symmetric cone optimization.

We introduce the concept of a risk form, which is a real functional of two arguments: a measurable function on a Polish space and a measure on that space. We generalize the duality theory and the Kusuoka representation to this setting. For a risk form acting on a product of Polish spaces, we define marginal and conditional forms and we prove a disintegration formula, which represents a risk form as a composition of its marginal and conditional forms. We apply the proposed approach to two-stage stochastic programming problems with partial information and decision-dependent observation distribution.

This paper considers nonconvex distributed constrained optimization over networks, modeled as directed (possibly time-varying) graphs. We introduce the first algorithmic framework for the minimization of the sum of a smooth nonconvex (nonseparable) function--the agent's sum-utility--plus a Difference-of-Convex (DC) function (with nonsmooth convex part). This general formulation arises in many applications, from statistical machine learning to engineering. The proposed distributed method combines successive convex approximation techniques with a judiciously designed perturbed push-sum consensus mechanism that aims to track locally the gradient of the (smooth part of the) sum-utility. Sublinear convergence rate is proved when a fixed step-size (possibly different among the agents) is employed whereas asymptotic convergence to stationary solutions is proved using a diminishing step-size. Numerical results show that our algorithms compare favorably with current schemes on both convex and nonconvex problems., Comment: Submitted June 3, 2017, revised June 5, 2108. Part of this work has been presented at the 2016 Asilomar Conference on System, Signal and Computers and the 2017 IEEE ICASSP Conference

A celebrated theorem of Balas gives a linear mixed-integer formulation for the union of two nonempty polytopes whose relaxation gives the convex hull of this union. The number of inequalities in Balas formulation is linear in the number of inequalities that describe the two polytopes and the number of variables is doubled. In this paper we show that this is best possible: in every dimension there exist two nonempty polytopes such that if a formulation for the convex hull of their union has a number of inequalities that is polynomial in the number of inequalities that describe the two polytopes, then the number of additional variables is at least linear in the dimension of the polytopes. We then show that this result essentially carries over if one wants to approximate the convex hull of the union of two polytopes and also in the more restrictive setting of lift-and-project.

This paper reveals that a common and central role, played in many error bound (EB) conditions and a variety of gradient-type methods, is a residual measure operator. On one hand, by linking this operator with other optimality measures, we define a group of abstract EB conditions, and then analyze the interplay between them; on the other hand, by using this operator as an ascent direction, we propose an abstract gradient-type method, and then derive EB conditions that are necessary and sufficient for its linear convergence. The former provides a unified framework that not only allows us to find new connections between many existing EB conditions, but also paves a way to construct new EB conditions. The latter allows us to claim the weakest conditions guaranteeing linear convergence for a number of fundamental algorithms, including the gradient method, the proximal point algorithm, and the forward-backward splitting algorithm. In addition, we show linear convergence for the proximal alternating linearized minimization algorithm under a group of equivalent EB conditions, which are strictly weaker than the traditional strongly convex condition. Moreover, by defining a new EB condition, we show Q-linear convergence of Nesterov's accelerated forward-backward algorithm without strong convexity. Finally, we verify EB conditions for a class of dual objective functions., 40 papes; incorporating the referee's comments, the presentation has been further improved

For controlled discrete-time stochastic processes we introduce a new class of dynamic risk measures, which we call process-based. Their main feature is that they measure risk of processes that are functions of the history of a base process. We introduce a new concept of conditional stochastic time consistency and we derive the structure of process-based risk measures enjoying this property. We show that they can be equivalently represented by a collection of static law-invariant risk measures on the space of functions of the state of the base process. We apply this result to controlled Markov processes and we derive dynamic programming equations. We also derive dynamic programming equations for multistage stochastic programming with decision-dependent distributions.

Multi-stage stochastic linear programs (MSLPs) are notoriously hard to solve in general. Linear decision rules (LDRs) yield an approximation of an MSLP by restricting the decisions at each stage to be an affine function of the observed uncertain parameters. Finding an optimal LDR is a static optimization problem that provides an upper bound on the optimal value of the MSLP, and, under certain assumptions, can be formulated as an explicit linear program. Similarly, as proposed by Kuhn, Wiesemann, and Georghiou (Math. Program., 130, 177-209, 2011) a lower bound for an MSLP can be obtained by restricting decisions in the dual of the MSLP to follow an LDR. We propose a new approximation approach for MSLPs, two-stage LDRs. The idea is to require only the state variables in an MSLP to follow an LDR, which is sufficient to obtain an approximation of an MSLP that is a two-stage stochastic linear program (2SLP). We similarly propose to apply LDR only to a subset of the variables in the dual of the MSLP, which yields a 2SLP approximation of the dual that provides a lower bound on the optimal value of the MSLP. Although solving the corresponding 2SLP approximations exactly is intractable in general, we investigate how approximate solution approaches that have been developed for solving 2SLP can be applied to solve these approximation problems, and derive statistical upper and lower bounds on the optimal value of the MSLP. In addition to potentially yielding better policies and bounds, this approach requires many fewer assumptions than are required to obtain an explicit reformulation when using the standard static LDR approach. A computational study on two example problems demonstrates that using a two-stage LDR can yield significantly better primal policies and modestly better dual policies than using policies based on a static LDR.

This paper addresses the question of whether it can be beneficial for an optimization algorithm to follow directions of negative curvature. Although prior work has established convergence results for algorithms that integrate both descent and negative curvature steps, there has not yet been extensive numerical evidence showing that such methods offer consistent performance improvements. In this paper, we present new frameworks for combining descent and negative curvature directions: alternating two-step approaches and dynamic step approaches. The aspect that distinguishes our approaches from ones previously proposed is that they make algorithmic decisions based on (estimated) upper-bounding models of the objective function. A consequence of this aspect is that our frameworks can, in theory, employ fixed stepsizes, which makes the methods readily translatable from deterministic to stochastic settings. For deterministic problems, we show that instances of our dynamic framework yield gains in performance compared to related methods that only follow descent steps. We also show that gains can be made in a stochastic setting in cases when a standard stochastic-gradient-type method might make slow progress.

This paper analyzes block-coordinate proximal gradient methods for minimizing the sum of a separable smooth function and a (nonseparable) nonsmooth function, both of which are allowed to be nonconvex. The main tool in our analysis is the forward-backward envelope (FBE), which serves as a particularly suitable continuous and real-valued Lyapunov function. Global and linear convergence results are established when the cost function satisfies the Kurdyka-\L ojasiewicz property without imposing convexity requirements on the smooth function. Two prominent special cases of the investigated setting are regularized finite sum minimization and the sharing problem; in particular, an immediate byproduct of our analysis leads to novel convergence results and rates for the popular Finito/MISO algorithm in the nonsmooth and nonconvex setting with very general sampling strategies. This paper analyzes block-coordinate proximal gradient methods for minimizing the sum of a separable smooth function and a (nonseparable) nonsmooth function, both of which are allowed to be nonconvex. The main tool in our analysis is the forward-backward envelope (FBE), which serves as a particularly suitable continuous and real-valued Lyapunov function. Global and linear convergence results are established when the cost function satisfies the Kurdyka-\L ojasiewicz property without imposing convexity requirements on the smooth function. Two prominent special cases of the investigated setting are regularized finite sum minimization and the sharing problem; in particular, an immediate byproduct of our analysis leads to novel convergence results and rates for the popular Finito/MISO algorithm in the nonsmooth and nonconvex setting with very general sampling strategies.

We consider the problem of computing the minimum value $f_{\min,K}$ of a polynomial $f$ over a compact set $K \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$, which can be reformulated as finding a probability measure $\nu$ on $K$ minimizing $\int_K f d\nu$. Lasserre showed that it suffices to consider such measures of the form $\nu = q\mu$, where $q$ is a sum-of-squares polynomial and $\mu$ is a given Borel measure supported on $K$. By bounding the degree of $q$ by $2r$ one gets a converging hierarchy of upper bounds $f^{(r)}$ for $f_{\min,K}$. When $K$ is the hypercube $[-1, 1]^n$, equipped with the Chebyshev measure, the parameters $f^{(r)}$ are known to converge to $f_{\min,K}$ at a rate in $O(1/r^2)$. We extend this error estimate to a wider class of convex bodies, while also allowing for a broader class of reference measures, including the Lebesgue measure. Our analysis applies to simplices, balls and convex bodies that locally look like a ball. In addition, we show an error estimate in $O(\log r / r)$ when $K$ satisfies a minor geometrical condition, and in $O(\log^2 r / r^2)$ when $K$ is a convex body, equipped with the Lebesgue measure. This improves upon the currently best known error estimates in $O(1 / \sqrt{r})$ and $O(1/r)$ for these two respective cases., Comment: 30 pages with 10 figures. Update notes for second version: Added a new section containing numerical examples that illustrate the theoretical results -- Fixed minor mistakes/typos -- Improved some notation -- Clarified certain explanations in the text

In this paper, we study local convergence of high-order Tensor Methods for solving convex optimization problems with composite objective. We justify local superlinear convergence under the assumption of uniform convexity of the smooth component, having Lipschitz-continuous high-order derivative. The convergence both in function value and in the norm of minimal subgradient is established. Global complexity bounds for the Composite Tensor Method in convex and uniformly convex cases are also discussed. Lastly, we show how local convergence of the methods can be globalized using the inexact proximal iterations.

We consider global efficiency of algorithms for minimizing a sum of a convex function and a composition of a Lipschitz convex function with a smooth map. The basic algorithm we rely on is the prox-linear method, which in each iteration solves a regularized subproblem formed by linearizing the smooth map. When the subproblems are solved exactly, the method has efficiency $$\mathcal {O}(\varepsilon ^{-2})$$ , akin to gradient descent for smooth minimization. We show that when the subproblems can only be solved by first-order methods, a simple combination of smoothing, the prox-linear method, and a fast-gradient scheme yields an algorithm with complexity $$\widetilde{\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon ^{-3})$$ . We round off the paper with an inertial prox-linear method that automatically accelerates in presence of convexity.

We consider a new and general online resource allocation problem, where the goal is to maximize a function of a positive semidefinite (PSD) matrix with a scalar budget constraint. The problem data arrives online, and the algorithm needs to make an irrevocable decision at each step. Of particular interest are classic experiment design problems in the online setting, with the algorithm deciding whether to allocate budget to each experiment as new experiments become available sequentially. We analyze two greedy primal-dual algorithms and provide bounds on their competitive ratios. Our analysis relies on a smooth surrogate of the objective function that needs to satisfy a new diminishing returns (PSD-DR) property (that its gradient is order-reversing with respect to the PSD cone). Using the representation for monotone maps on the PSD cone given by L\"owner's theorem, we obtain a convex parametrization of the family of functions satisfying PSD-DR. We then formulate a convex optimization problem to directly optimize our competitive ratio bound over this set. This design problem can be solved offline before the data start arriving. The online algorithm that uses the designed smoothing is tailored to the given cost function, and enjoys a competitive ratio at least as good as our optimized bound. We provide examples of computing the smooth surrogate for D-optimal and A-optimal experiment design, and demonstrate the performance of the custom-designed algorithm., Comment: 23 pages

With the increasing interest in applying the methodology of difference-of-convex (dc) optimization to diverse problems in engineering and statistics, this paper establishes the dc property of many functions in various areas of applications not previously known to be of this class. Motivated by a quadratic programming based recourse function in two-stage stochastic programming, we show that the (optimal) value function of a copositive (thus not necessarily convex) quadratic program is dc on the domain of finiteness of the program when the matrix in the objective function’s quadratic term and the constraint matrix are fixed. The proof of this result is based on a dc decomposition of a piecewise $$\hbox {LC}^1$$ function (i.e., functions with Lipschitz gradients). Armed with these new results and known properties of dc functions existed in the literature, we show that many composite statistical functions in risk analysis, including the value-at-risk (VaR), conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), optimized certainty equivalent, and the expectation-based, VaR-based, and CVaR-based random deviation functionals are all dc. Adding the known class of dc surrogate sparsity functions that are employed as approximations of the $$\ell _0$$ function in statistical learning, our work significantly expands the classes of dc functions and positions them for fruitful applications.

The possibilities of exploiting the special structure of d.c. programs, which consist of optimizing the difference of convex functions, are currently more or less limited to variants of the DCA proposed by Pham Dinh Tao and Le Thi Hoai An in 1997. These assume that either the convex or the concave part, or both, are evaluated by one of their subgradients. In this paper we propose an algorithm which allows the evaluation of both the concave and the convex part by their proximal points. Additionally, we allow a smooth part, which is evaluated via its gradient. In the spirit of primal-dual splitting algorithms, the concave part might be the composition of a concave function with a linear operator, which are, however, evaluated separately. For this algorithm we show that every cluster point is a solution of the optimization problem. Furthermore, we show the connection to the Toland dual problem and prove a descent property for the objective function values of a primal-dual formulation of the problem. Convergence of the iterates is shown if this objective function satisfies the Kurdyka--\L ojasiewicz property. In the last part, we apply the algorithm to an image processing model.

We propose a new family of inexact sequential quadratic approximation (SQA) methods, which we call the inexact regularized proximal Newton (IRPN) method, for minimizing the sum of two closed proper convex functions, one of which is smooth and the other is possibly non-smooth. Our proposed method features strong convergence guarantees even when applied to problems with degenerate solutions while allowing the inner minimization to be solved inexactly. Specifically, we prove that when the problem possesses the so-called Luo–Tseng error bound (EB) property, IRPN converges globally to an optimal solution, and the local convergence rate of the sequence of iterates generated by IRPN is linear, superlinear, or even quadratic, depending on the choice of parameters of the algorithm. Prior to this work, such EB property has been extensively used to establish the linear convergence of various first-order methods. However, to the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to use the Luo–Tseng EB property to establish the superlinear convergence of SQA-type methods for non-smooth convex minimization. As a consequence of our result, IRPN is capable of solving regularized regression or classification problems under the high-dimensional setting with provable convergence guarantees. We compare our proposed IRPN with several empirically efficient algorithms by applying them to the $$\ell _1$$ -regularized logistic regression problem. Experiment results show the competitiveness of our proposed method.

This paper proposes tight semidefinite relaxations for polynomial optimization. The optimality conditions are investigated. We show that generally Lagrange multipliers can be expressed as polynomial functions in decision variables over the set of critical points. The polynomial expressions can be determined by linear equations. Based on these expressions, new Lasserre type semidefinite relaxations are constructed for solving polynomial optimization. We show that the hierarchy of new relaxations has finite convergence, or equivalently, the new relaxations are tight for a finite relaxation order., Comment: 27 pages

In this paper, we consider two paradigms that are developed to account for uncertainty in optimization models: robust optimization (RO) and joint estimation-optimization (JEO). We examine recent developments on efficient and scalable iterative first-order methods for these problems, and show that these iterative methods can be viewed through the lens of online convex optimization (OCO). The standard OCO framework has seen much success for its ability to handle decision-making in dynamic, uncertain, and even adversarial environments. Nevertheless, our applications of interest present further flexibility in OCO via three simple modifications to standard OCO assumptions: we introduce two new concepts of weighted regret and online saddle point problems and study the possibility of making lookahead (anticipatory) decisions. Our analyses demonstrate that these flexibilities introduced into the OCO framework have significant consequences whenever they are applicable. For example, in the strongly convex case, minimizing unweighted regret has a proven optimal bound of $$O(\mathop {\mathrm{log}}(T)/T)$$, whereas we show that a bound of O(1 / T) is possible when we consider weighted regret. Similarly, for the smooth case, considering 1-lookahead decisions results in a O(1 / T) bound, compared to $$O(1/\sqrt{T})$$ in the standard OCO setting. Consequently, these OCO tools are instrumental in exploiting structural properties of functions and results in improved convergence rates for RO and JEO. In certain cases, our results for RO and JEO match the best known or optimal rates in the corresponding problem classes without data uncertainty.