Search

We consider risk-averse formulations of stochastic linear programs having a structure that is common in real-life applications. Specifically, the optimization problem corresponds to controlling over a certain horizon a system whose dynamics is given by a transition equation depending affinely on an interstage dependent stochastic process. We put in place a rolling-horizon time consistent policy. For each time step, a risk-averse problem with constraints that are deterministic for the current time step and uncertain for future times is solved. To each uncertain constraint corresponds both a chance and a Conditional Value-at-Risk constraint. We show that the resulting risk-averse problems are numerically tractable, being at worst conic quadratic programs. For the particular case in which uncertainty appears only on the right-hand side of the constraints, such risk-averse problems are linear programs. We show how to write dynamic programming equations for these problems and define robust recourse functions that can be approximated recursively by cutting planes. The methodology is assessed and favourably compared with Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming on a real size water-resource planning problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lagrangian relaxation is a popular technique to solve difficult optimization problems. However, the applicability of this technique depends on having a relatively low number of hard constraints to dualize. When there are many hard constraints, it may be preferable to relax them dynamically, according to some rule depending on which multipliers are active. From the dual point of view, this approach yields multipliers with varying dimensions and a dual objective function that changes along iterations. We discuss how to apply a bundle methodology to solve this kind of dual problems. Our framework covers many separation procedures to generate inequalities that can be found in the literature, including (but not limited to) the most violated inequality. We analyze the resulting dynamic bundle method giving a positive answer for its primal-dual convergence properties, and, under suitable conditions, show finite termination for polyhedral problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The proximal point mapping is the basis of many optimization techniques for convex functions. By means of variational analysis, the concept of proximal mapping was recently extended to nonconvex functions that are prox-regular and prox-bounded. In such a setting, the proximal point mapping is locally Lipschitz continuous and its set of fixed points coincide with the critical points of the original function. This suggests that the many uses of proximal points, and their corresponding proximal envelopes (Moreau envelopes), will have a natural extension from convex optimization to nonconvex optimization. For example, the inexact proximal point methods for convex optimization might be redesigned to work for nonconvex functions. In order to begin the practical implementation of proximal points in a nonconvex setting, a first crucial step would be to design efficient methods of approximating nonconvex proximal points. This would provide a solid foundation on which future design and analysis for nonconvex proximal point methods could flourish. In this paper we present a methodology based on the computation of proximal points of piecewise affine models of the nonconvex function. These models can be built with only the knowledge obtained from a black box providing, for each point, the function value and one subgradient. Convergence of the method is proved for the class of nonconvex functions that are prox-bounded and lower- $${\mathcal{C}}^2$$ and encouraging preliminary numerical testing is reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For solving nonsmooth convex constrained optimization problems, we propose an algorithm which combines the ideas of the proximal bundle methods with the filter strategy for evaluating candidate points. The resulting algorithm inherits some attractive features from both approaches. On the one hand, it allows effective control of the size of quadratic programming subproblems via the compression and aggregation techniques of proximal bundle methods. On the other hand, the filter criterion for accepting a candidate point as the new iterate is sometimes easier to satisfy than the usual descent condition in bundle methods. Some encouraging preliminary computational results are also reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]