Search

Introduction: Home visitation programs that reach families of young children offer a unique opportunity for large-scale early childhood obesity prevention efforts. The objective of this qualitative research was to determine stakeholder attitudes, subjective norms, perceived ease of use and usefulness, behavioral control, and behavioral intentions towards utilizing technology in a home visitation program targeting early childhood obesity prevention. Methods: Staff from the Florida Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (n = 27) were interviewed individually by a trained research assistant using a semi-structured script based on constructs from the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Demographic and technology use information were collected. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, with data extracted and coded by two trained researchers using a theoretical thematic analysis approach. Results: Most of the home visiting staff (78%) were white and non-Hispanic and employed for an average of 5 years with the program. Most staff (85%) indicated they were currently using videoconferencing for home visits. Themes and subthemes emerged, including positive attitudes towards technology as a flexible and time-efficient program alternative for childhood obesity prevention with recommendations to keep content short, at a low literacy level, and available in more than one language for ease of use. Participants recommended developing training tutorials to improve program implementation. Internet access and potential social disconnect were cited as concerns for using technology. Discussion: Overall, home visitation staff had positive attitudes and intentions for using technology in home visiting programs with families for early childhood obesity prevention. Significance: What is already known on this subject? Home visitation programs have adopted technology for virtual service delivery during unforeseen circumstances that prevent in-person visits, such as COVID-19 restrictions. What does this study add? This qualitative study revealed positive attitudes and intentions of staff members of home visitation programs towards the use of digital learning technology in conjunction with home visits to enhance content related to early childhood obesity prevention for families participating in home visitation programs. Key suggestions to consider in the development of future childhood obesity digital interventions include appropriateness for the audience of interest (i.e., available in different languages, suitable literacy level), ease of use (i.e., simple, user-friendly, interactive features), and practical strategies to support the implementation (i.e., staff trainings, built-in flexibility). It is important to also consider technology-specific challenges that communities may face when incorporating technology in interventions (i.e., lack of access to devices, costs associated with reliable internet and data, compatibility of devices). Findings will help inform and guide the development of future childhood obesity digital interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Few studies have elucidated the impact of work-related trauma on labor and delivery clinician or considered whether it may be a cause of burnout. This study aims to elicit labor and delivery clinician perspectives on the impact of exposure to traumatic births on their professional quality of life. Methods: Labor and delivery clinicians (physicians, midwives, nurse practitioners, and nurses; n = 165) were recruited to complete an online questionnaire on experiences with traumatic births. The questionnaire contained measures from the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the professional quality of life scale version 5. Some participants completed an optional free-text prompt to recommend ways to support clinicians after traumatic births (n = 115). Others opted into a semi-structured phone interview (n = 8). Qualitative data was analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: Self-reported adequate institutional support for clinicians after a traumatic birth was positively correlated with compassion satisfaction (r = 0.21, p < 0.01) and negatively correlated with secondary traumatic stress (r = − 0.27, p < 0.01), and burnout (r = − 0.26, p < 0.01). Qualitative themes included lack of system-wide and leadership support, lack of access to mental health resources, and suboptimal workplace culture as contributors toward secondary traumatic stress and burnout. Participants recommended proactive leadership, consistent debriefing protocols, trauma education, and improved access to counseling. Conclusions for Practice: Multi-level barriers prevented labor and delivery clinicians from accessing needed mental health support after exposure to traumatic births. Proactive investment in healthcare system supports for clinicians may improve clinician professional quality of life. Significance: What is already known on this subject? Studies on traumatic birth experiences rarely consider the impact on the providers caring for those patients. Few studies have elucidated the impact of work-related trauma on labor and delivery clinicians or considered whether it may contribute to burnout. What this study adds? This study found that involvement in traumatic birth experiences can affect labor and delivery clinician's professional quality of life, their interactions with patients, and desire to stay in the field. However, there is little acknowledgement or supports to mitigate these impacts in the workplace. Proactively investing in health care system supports for clinicians may mitigate clinician burnout and secondary traumatic stress and improve compassion satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recognition of the importance of adolescents' environments in influencing their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) decision-making necessitates a deeper understanding of the role that community stakeholders play in shaping Adolescent and Young Adults (AYA) access to SRH education and care. We describe community stakeholders' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about AYA's SRH needs in three rural Latino communities in Kansas. Methods: Key stakeholders completed a written survey incorporating the theory of Planned Behavior to assess attitudes, norms, and intentions to support AYA's SRH education and access to care. Results: Across three rural immigrant community settings, respondents (N = 55) included 8 community health workers, 9 health care providers, 7 public health officials, 19 school health officials, and 12 community members. More than half self-identified as Latino (55%). Six (11%) participants, half of whom were in the health sector, thought SRH education would increase the likelihood that teens would engage in sexual activities. In contrast, other stakeholders thought that providing condoms (17, 30.9%), contraception other than condoms (14, 25.5%), and providing HPV immunization (5, 9.6%) would increase the likelihood of engaging in sexual activity. Ambivalence regarding support for SRH education and service provision prevailed across sectors, reflected even in the endorsement of the distribution of less effective contraceptive methods. Obstacles to care include immigration status, discrimination, lack of confidential services, and transportation. Conclusion: Key stakeholders living in rural communities revealed misconceptions, negative attitudes, and ambivalent beliefs related to the delivery of SRH education and services, potentially creating barriers to AYA's successful access to care. Significance: Little is known about the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes held by key stakeholders in rural immigrant Latino communities regarding their level of support for AYA's SRH needs. Key stakeholders may harbor influential and ambivalent opinions regarding AYA's sexuality considering existing cultural norms, therefore, stigmatizing access to SRH education and care. We examined key community stakeholders' attitudes and norms as measures of intentions to support AYA's SRH education and care. We identify actionable steps needed to eliminate existing barriers to AYA's access to SRH education and care among at-risk immigrant Latino communities in the rural Midwest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Despite the seriousness of influenza and pertussis, availability of safe and effective vaccines against them, and long-standing maternal vaccination recommendations, US maternal influenza and Tdap vaccination rates have been low. To increase vaccination rates in obstetric offices, it is important to understand clinician perspectives and office processes. We conducted in-depth interviews with nurses and providers on these topics. Methods: Interviewees worked in obstetric offices in one-of-four participating health systems in NY and CA. We audio-recorded and transcribed 20–30-min interviews. We used predetermined categories to code interviews with Dedoose, then iteratively refined codes and identified themes. Results: We conducted 20 interviews between 4/2020 and 9/2020: 13 providers (physician or nurse midwife) (5 NY, 8 CA); 7 office nurses (6 NY, 1 CA). In almost all offices, patient refusal of influenza vaccine was considered the major vaccination barrier; Tdap was often deferred by patients until post-delivery. Nurse-only visits for either vaccine were rare. Vaccination outside the office was uncommon; few offices systematically documented vaccines given elsewhere in a retrievable manner. Participants emphasized patient education as key to prenatal care, but the number of topics left little time for immunizations. Few interviewees could identify an office "immunization champion," knew their office vaccination rates, or had participated in vaccination quality improvement. Several interviewees indicated that they or another provider were good at persuading hesitant patients, but their method had not been shared with other clinicians. Conclusions for Practice: Multiple practical barriers and maternal vaccine hesitancy limit maternal vaccination. Quality improvement strategies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Movements to stem abortion accessibility and provision are underway across the southern United States. Preserving access to safe abortion requires a steady maternal health workforce. Targeted laws and limiting environments have contributed to a regional dearth of abortion providers. This study evaluates the consequences of restrictive environments for the abortion workforce to inform strategies to reduce the provider shortage in the South. Methods: We recruited twelve physicians using purposive sampling and interviewed them on their motivations and experiences practicing in the South. We employed grounded theory analysis to translate their perspectives into recommendations for provider recruitment and retention. Results: Abortion providers identified challenges relating to restrictive legislation, institutional separation of abortion from other medical services, training unavailability, safety concerns, identity struggles, and marginalization within their profession. This contributed to providers widely experiencing stigma and isolation within their work and life environments. Their motivations for practicing in the South despite these challenges included wanting to be impactful in areas of high need, combating health access disparites, and having personal ties to the region. Providers' suggested increasing regional networking and training opportunities, creating an information clearinghouse, and offering additional compensation to better support their work. We conceptualized these findings into a framework detailing the challenges, impacts and opportunities for abortion provision in the southern United States. Conclusions for Practice: Our recommendations for provider recruitment and retention include cooperation between professional organizations, training programs, and healthcare institutions to create opportunities for training and networking and encourage abortion-supportive organizational and policy environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this report from the field is to describe the process by which an multidisciplinary workgroup, selected by the CDC Foundation in partnership with maternal health experts, developed a definition of racism that would be specifically appropriate for inclusion on the Maternal Mortality Review Information Application (MMRIA) form. Description: In the United States Black women are nearly 4 times more likely to experience a pregnancy-related death. Recent evidence points to racism as a fundamental cause of this inequity. Furthermore, the CDC reports that 3 of 5 pregnancy related deaths are preventable. With these startling facts in mind, the CDC created the Maternal Mortality Review Information Application (MMRIA) for use by Maternal Mortality Review Committees (MMRC) to support standardized data abstraction, case narrative development, documentation of committee decisions, and analysis on maternal mortality to inform practices and policies for preventing maternal mortality. Assessment: Charged with the task of defining racism and discrimination as contributors to pregnancy related mortality, the work group established four goals to define their efforts: (1) the desire to create a product that was inclusive of all forms of racism and discrimination experienced by birthing people; (2) an acknowledgement of the legacy of racism in the U.S. and the norms in health care delivery that perpetuate racist ideology; (3) an acknowledgement of the racist narratives surrounding the issue of maternal mortality and morbidity that often leads to victim blaming; and (4) that the product would be user friendly for MMRCs. Conclusion: The working group developed three definitions and a list of recommendations for action to help MMRC members provide suggested interventions to adopt when discrimination or racism were contributing factors to a maternal death. The specification of these definitions will allow the systematic tracking of the contribution of racism to maternal mortality through the MMRIA and allow a greater standardization of its identification across participating jurisdictions with MMRCs that use the form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The preterm birth rate for Black women in the U.S. is consistently higher than other racial groups. The crisis of preterm birth and adverse birth outcomes among Black people is a historical, systematic confluence of racism, stressors, and an unsupportive and hostile healthcare system. To inform the development of preterm birth risk reduction interventions, this study aimed to collect and synthesize the experiences of Black women who gave birth preterm along with clinicians and community-based organizations who serve them. Methods: A qualitative study design was employed whereby nine focus groups and 17 key informant interviews that included Black women, clinicians, and representatives from community-based organizations were facilitated in Los Angeles County from March 2019 to March 2020. Participants were recruited through the organizations and the focus groups took place virtually and in person. The process of thematic analysis was employed to analyze the focus group and interview transcripts. Results: Five overarching themes emerged from the data. Black women experience chronic and pregnancy-related stress, and have lasting trauma from adverse maternal health experiences. These issues are exacerbated by racism and cultural incongruence within healthcare and social services systems. Black women have relied on self-education and self-advocacy to endure the barriers related to racism, mistreatment, and their experiences with preterm birth. Conclusions for Practice: Healthcare and social service providers must offer more holistic care that prioritizes, rather than ignores, the racial components of health, placing increased importance on implementing inclusive and culturally-appropriate patient education, attentiveness to patient needs, respectful care, and support for Black women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Preconception care (PCC) is a recognised strategy for optimising maternal health and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. PCC services are minimally available and not fully integrated into maternal health services in Nigeria. This study explored perceptions about PCC services among health care providers in Ibadan, Nigeria. Methods: Using a qualitative case study design the perspectives of 26 health care providers—16 specialist physicians and nine nurses covering 10 specialties at the primary, secondary and tertiary health care levels was explored. In-depth interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed on MAXQDA using thematic analysis. Results: Almost all participants stated that PCC services should be offered at all three levels of health care with referral when needed between lower and higher levels. Participants stated that although all people of reproductive age would benefit from PCC, those who had medical problems like hypertension, sickle cell disease, diabetes and infertility would benefit more. Participants opined that delayed health care seeking observed in the community may influence acceptability of PCC especially for people without known pre-existing conditions. All specialist physicians identified the relevance of PCC to their practice. They identified potential benefits of PCC including opportunity to prepare for pregnancy to ensure positive pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions for Practice: Preconception care is perceived as important for promoting positive pregnancy outcomes in people with known medical problems and is relevant to different specialities of medical practice. Provision of the service will require establishment of guidelines and uptake will depend on acceptability to community members who will benefit from the service. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]