Search

Annual surveys conducted by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists repeatedly show that hemorrhage is the leading cause of life-threatening events in the operating room.We performed a questionnaire survey regarding the present status of critical hemorrhage/ blood transfusion occurring in the operating room on an institutional scale and individual blood transfusion management in cases of massive hemorrhage (or = 5,000 ml) in hospitals withor = 500 beds and those with an accredited Department of Anesthesiology regarded as regional hospitals.Of 384 institutions, 247 responded to the questionnaire (response rate: 64%), and 692,241 cases managed by anesthesiologists in 2006 were registered. There were 2,657 cases of massive hemorrhage above the circulating blood volume in the operating room, and 404 of them were critical. Thus, the number of cases of massive hemorrhage was 6.6 times that of cases of critical events due to hemorrhage. In the survey of individual cases of massive hemorrhage (or = 5,000 ml), 1,257 cases were registered in 2006, of whom 196 cases (15.6%) died within 30 post-operative days and 160 cases (12.7%) had some sequelae. The amount of transfused red blood cell concentrate was 25.2 +/- 24.2 units. The amount of red blood cell concentrates stocked for emergency was 12.7 +/- 10.1 units for blood group A, 9.7 +/- 7.3 units for group B, 11.9 +/- 9.6 group AB, and 11.3 +/- 11.0 for group O. Therefore, for those other than group O cases, 21-46 units of red blood cell concentrates seemed to be available in the hospital. The survey of individual cases showed uncross-matched, same blood group transfusion and compatible, different blood group transfusion were performed in only 8.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The lowest hemoglobin concentration was below 5 g x dl(-1) in 16.7% of the cases, but uncross-matched, same blood group transfusion was performed only in 19.0% and compatible, different blood group red cell concentrate transfusion in 5.2%. Even in cases who required cardiac massage, uncross-matched, same blood group transfusion was performed only in 17.1% and compatible, different blood group red cell concentrate transfusion in 8.5%. Intraoperative blood salvage was performed in only 5.7% in cases who underwent non-cardiac surgery. The "Guidelines for the Management of Critical Hemorrhage" proposed in 2007 or the manuals for in-hospital emergency blood transfusion were insufficiently recognized, even by anesthesiologists, and rarely known by surgeons. There were no such manuals in more than 60% of the institutions.Undertransfusion may occur in 16.7-28.3% of cases of massive hemorrhage in the operating room, and the rate of emergency blood transfusion was much lower than this percentage. To avoid operation-associated deaths from hemorrhage, the improvement of hospital systems for emergency blood transfusion, including the active use of intraoperative blood salvage, should be promoted.

According to a survey of anesthesia-related critical incidents by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, hemorrhage was the major cause of cardiac arrest developing in the operating room. To deal with critical hemorrhage swiftly, not only cooperation between anesthesiologists and surgeons but also the linkage of operating rooms with transfusion management divisions and the blood center is important. It is desirable for the hospital transfusion committee to prepare hospital regulations on 'actions to be taken to manage critical hemorrhage', and practice the implementation of these guidelines by simulated drills. When critical hemorrhage occurs, a person in charge is appointed, and an emergency is declared (call for manpower and notification of the emergency to the transfusion management divisions). A person in charge comprehensively assesses the hemostatic condition, hemodynamics, laboratory data, and blood product supply system, and consults the operator regarding the continuation of surgery or changing surgical procedures. When time is short, the cross-matching test is omitted, and the ABO-identical blood is used. When a supply of the identical ABO-type blood is not available, compatible blood type is used. The evolving concept of hemostatic resuscitation seems to be important to prevent coagulopathy, which easily develops during massive hemorrhage. Anesthesiologists should be aware of the risk of such an emergency transfusion and procedures to be taken to switch to transfusion of the ABO-identical blood. Establishment of a hospital emergency transfusion system depends on the overall capability of the critical and crisis management systems of the hospital.

Transurethral holmium YAG laser resection of the prostate (HoLR-P) and transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate (TUV-P) have recently received increasing attention as an effective minimally invasive approach for the treatment of prostatic hypertrophy. However, less information is available regarding the intraoperative changes in the serum Na+ and blood hemoglobin levels during either HoLR-P or TUV-P.Intraoperative changes in serum Na+ and blood hemoglobin levels were investigated in 17 patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P, n = 7), HoLR-P (n = 7) or TUV-P (n = 3). The 3% D-sorbitol solution was used as the irrigating fluid in all the patients.In three patients, severe hyponatremia (118-123 mEq x l(-1)) developed abruptly (or = 15 min) at various time points during TUR-P with (n = 1) or without (n = 2) cystostomy. However, no clinical symptoms were observed after development of the hyponatremia in those awake patients. No large (10 mEq x l(-1)) decreases in the Na+ level were observed in any of the patients undergoing HoLR-P or TUV-P. In patients undergoing TUR-P and HoLR-P, percent changes in serum Na+ level significantly correlated with those in blood hemoglobin level, but not with the resection time; the slopes were significantly larger than unity.The TUR syndrome is less likely to occur during HoLR-P or TUV-P. During TUR-P, the onset of severe hyponatremia appears to be unpredictable, and may not necessarily be accompanied by clinical symptoms. Frequent measurements of the serum Na+ level appear essential for early detection of severe hyponatremia.