Search

In recent years, noticeable subsidence depressions have occurred along the coastal zone of the Yellow River Delta. In some coastal areas, the average annual subsidence varies from tens of millimeters to hundreds of millimeters. Although some studies have discovered a significant land subsidence funnel in the coastal zone of the Yellow River Delta, it has rarely been reported in recent years. Using Sentinel-1A/1B images from the last five years and permanent scatterers interferometric synthetic aperture radar technology, we found a typical subsidence bowl in the northeastern part of the delta, with a cumulative settlement of nearly 1 m over five years. In addition, we used the approach of soil mechanics to simulate the settlement of confined brine layers with different thicknesses under drainage conditions. We found that the 15 m thick confined aquifer can produce 1 m of settlement for every 15% decrease in water content. The simulation results explain the large settlement of the brine industrial area. This study can provide guidance for brine mining in the future. If we continue to overexploit underground brine, there will be more severe land subsidence in the delta in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, many of the world's major river deltas have been sinking, making them increasingly vulnerable to floods and storm surges, salinization and permanent inundation. For the Yellow River delta, annual subsidence rates of several to dozens of centimeters have been reported in the past few years. The extraction of a considerable amount of groundwater due to continuous pumping is suggested as the main driver of the groundwater depression cone. Despite its scale and severity, methods to quantify subsidence are scarce. We introduce a soil mechanics approach to quantify subsidence due to the compaction of soft soil. The largest reduction in soft soil thickness, which is more than 2.6 m, occurred in the salt field area to the north of the Yellow River. Furthermore, by estimating the primary consolidation of soft soil, the subsidence caused by groundwater exploitation is quantified. In the coastal area of the delta, due to excessive exploitation of shallow underground brine resources, the maximum accumulated subsidence is as high as 2 m. Since the natural consolidation of these deltaic sediments has ended, if the current groundwater exploitation intensity is maintained, major subsidence disasters, such as subsidence depressions and ground fissures, will occur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Yellow River Delta, which is the second-largest delta in China, has experienced varying degrees of land subsidence since the late 1970s. Although recent studies have identified the natural consolidation and compaction of sediment among the most important contributors to geologic processes, their processes have rarely been quantified. We estimated the sediment compaction over different time ranges to determine the temporal evolution of subsidence parameters (i.e., cumulative compaction). Estimates of primary consolidation, secondary consolidation, and the degree of consolidation in 152 boreholes revealed the spatial–temporal characteristics of sediment compaction and consolidation using geotechnical parameters collected from 152 boreholes, soil mechanics equations and the Kriging interplolation method. In addition, these estimates were partially constrained and cross-validated using the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) results from early 2007 to late 2010 which were provided in a previous study. By performing a comparison analysis between theoretical evaluations of compaction for borehole data and InSAR observations, we were able to quantify subsidence due to sediment compaction. The comparison results suggest that the theoretical solutions agreed well with the measurements recorded by the well-validated, advanced InSAR method and that the deviations between the InSAR technique and geotechnical evaluations ranged from −22 to 3 mm. The results reveal that the land subsidence of the chosen borehole sites during the investigative period was dominated by the primary consolidation and compaction of sediment. The underprediction of subsidence may be explained by fluid withdrawal, oil exploitation and engineering construction. To speculate, more geological disasters may occur if the current subsidence condition extends into the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]