Search

As the offshore hydrocarbon industry matures and decommissioning activities are expected to increase, there is a requirement to assess the environmental consequences of different pipeline decommissioning options. Previous research on fish and other ecological components associated with pipelines has focused on examining species richness, abundance and biomass surrounding structures. The extent to which subsea pipelines mimic or alter ecosystem function compared with nearby natural habitats is unknown. We analyse differences in fish assemblage biological trait composition and the functional diversity at exposed shallow-water subsea pipelines, nearby natural reef and soft sediment habitats, using mini stereo-video remotely operated vehicles (ROV). Habitats significantly differed in assemblage trait composition. The pipeline and reef habitats shared a more similar functional composition and had the presence of key functional groups required for the development and maintenance of healthy coral reef systems. The reef habitat had the greatest functional diversity, followed by the pipeline habitat and soft sediment habitat respectively., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

We investigated the composition and abundance of fish assemblages associated with seven offshore oil and gas platform jackets in the Gulf of Thailand before (pre-lift and pre-tow), and immediately after relocation (post-tow and reefed). Jackets were cut, lifted until partly out of the water, and attached to the rear of a heavy lift vessel. They were towed at speeds of 2.7 - 3.3 knots for between 133.9 and 205.4 km before being placed on the seafloor at an artificial reef site. Sixteen species of fish were observed both before and after jacket towing. We believe these species have sought refuge in the complex structures out of the current and have remained with the jackets. Ten species of fish were observed before towing, but not after. A further seven species of fish were only observed after the jackets were relocated onto the seafloor and were assumed to be early colonisers to the structures. The paper provides empirical evidence of a much-discussed paradigm that fish can swim great distances following moved structures, and further evidence of the ability of fish to rapidly colonise reefed structures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Euan S. Harvey reports financial support, administrative support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, travel, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Michael Marnane reports financial support, administrative support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, travel, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Karl D. Schramm reports financial support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Damon Driessen reports financial support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Laura A. Fullwood reports financial support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Benjamin J. Saunders reports financial support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Se Songploy reports financial support, administrative support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and travel were provided by Chevron Inc. Jes Kettratad reports financial support, administrative support, article publishing charges, and statistical analysis were provided by Chevron Inc. Paweena Sitaworawet reports financial support, administrative support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Sarin Chaiyakul reports financial support, administrative support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, travel, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Anchalee Chankong reports article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Nararat Chantarawat reports article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Travis S. Elsdon reports financial support, administrative support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, travel, and writing assistance were provided by Chevron Inc. Euan S Harvey reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: funding grants and non-financial support. Michael J. Marnane reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: employment and non-financial support. Karl D. Schramm reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: funding grants and non-financial support. Damon Driessen reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: funding grants and non-financial support. Laura A. Fullwood reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: funding grants and non-financial support. Benjamin J. Saunders reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: funding grants and non-financial support. Se Songploy reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: funding grants and non-financial support. Jes Kettratad reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: funding grants and non-financial support. Paweena Sitaworawet reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: employment and non-financial support. Sarin Chaiyakul reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: employment and non-financial support. Anchalee Chankong reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: non-financial support. Nararat Chantarawat reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: non-financial support. Travis S. Elsdon reports a relationship with Chevron Inc that includes: employment and non-financial support., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Offshore oil and gas platforms have the potential to provide complex refugia for fish and benthic colonisers. We compare two methods of biodiversity assessment for fish and elasmobranchs at seven decommissioned oil and gas platforms as well as five sediment sites, located 5 km from platforms, in the Gulf of Thailand. Using surveys from stereo-video ROV transects, and data from Environmental DNA (eDNA) water-column samples, we detected fish and elasmobranch taxa from 39 families and 66 genera across both platform and sediment sites with eDNA, compared with 18 families and 29 genera by stereo-ROV with platforms yielding significantly greater species richness. This study demonstrates that the combination of stereo-video ROV and eDNA provide effective, non-extractive and complementary methods to enhance data capture. This approach sets new benchmarks for evaluating fish assemblages surrounding platforms and will enhance measurements of biota to inform decisions on the fate of oil/gas infrastructure., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

While marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasing worldwide, it is still needed to assess the effectiveness of those already consolidated. Methods and ecological assessments to understanding integrated and habitat-specific management regimes are still scarce and insufficient for policy implications and biodiversity conservation. Through Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV), we used fish assemblages as proxy of ecological and managerial status in two reef habitat types along three protection levels at Abrolhos Bank - the largest and most biodiverse coral reef complex of the South Atlantic. We found completely distinct responses in the fish fauna between the top (shallow) and bottom (deep) habitats of the unique "chapeirões" pinnacle reef formations. In the most protected zone (no-take), higher richness and abundance of commercial fish and more diverse trophic structure was observed. Particularly, large (sharks and groupers) and small carnivores (snappers) were more abundant and distributed more homogeneously over both reef habitats in the strictly enforced no-take zone. Abundance of these top-predators decreased from the low enforcement no-take zone to the multiple use area, where they were often absent while their typical preys (primary and secondary consumers) were thriving, notably in the top habitats. These outcomes highlight the importance to focus investigations not selectively on a single habitat type or depth zone in order to properly assess MPA effectiveness. Consequently, the monitoring and protection of fish species supported by marine spatial planning may benefit from an improved understanding of ecological functioning provided by MPA performance., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A large (~2450 km 2 ) offshore (~75 km) targeted fisheries closure (TFC) area was implemented on the North West Shelf of Australia (NWS) in 1998 as part of a suite of management controls to address overfishing concerns, and in the process to potentially mitigate any impacts of trawling to benthic habitats. Twelve years later, the benthic biota and fish assemblages in the TFC were assessed using stereo-video and compared with adjacent areas that have been consistently fished with a range of commercial fishing methods. The remote nature of the region has meant that these areas would be inaccessible to recreational fishers. After 12 years of protection there were significant differences between the TFC and comparable fished areas in both the composition and the height of biogenic structures, however the magnitude of these differences were subtle, except for branching soft corals, which were significantly taller in the TFC area. Despite the relatively young age of the TFC, significant differences in the fish abundance and biomass compositions were driven by the slower growing, longer lived and inherently less productive fishery target species. The abundance of Lutjanus sebae (red emperor) and Epinephelus multinotatus (Rankin cod), and the associated biomass of L. sebae and Pristipomoides multidens (goldband snapper) were all greater within the TFC. However, neither the abundance or biomass of the relatively shorter lived and more productive fishery species (e.g. the bluespotted emperor Lethrinus punctulatus and the brownstripe snapper Lutjanus vitta) were greater within the TFC. Growth rates of benthic biota across the NWS are unknown, however the limited detectable differences in benthic biota between the TFC and fished areas, suggests that either recovery of the benthic biota is slow and may not yet be at a threshold for detection and/or alternatively that current fishing activities are not causing adverse impacts to biogenic structures. These large, offshore targeted fishery closures provide a useful reference point to examine the natural variability, growth and recovery of benthic biota and fish assemblages after the cessation of fishing., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

We compared and contrasted fish assemblage data sampled by baited remote underwater stereo-video systems (stereo-BRUVs) and stereo-video remotely operated vehicles (stereo-ROVs) from subsea pipelines, reef and soft sediment habitats. Stereo-BRUVs sampled greater fish diversity across all three habitats, with the stereo-ROV sampling ~46% of the same species on pipeline and reef habitats. Larger differences existed in soft sediment habitats, with stereo-BRUVs recording ~65% more species than the stereo-ROV, the majority of which were generalist carnivores. These differences were likely due to the bait used with stereo-BRUVs attracting fish from a large and unknown area. Fish may have also avoided the moving stereo-ROV, an effect possibly magnified in open soft sediment habitats. As a result of these biases, we recommend stereo-ROVs for assessing fish communities on pipelines due to their ability to capture fish in-situ and within a defined sampling area, but caution is needed over soft sediment habitats for ecological comparisons., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The success of marine management initiatives and our capability for dealing with environmental change largely depend on our understanding regarding the distribution of species and their habitat preferences. In the present study, we deployed baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVs) in a portion of Brazilian central coast (i.e., Todos os Santos Bay) to describe fish species-habitat associations along an estuary-bay-continental shelf gradient. Significant variation in the fish assemblage was found among three ecosystems, four depth classes, and eight different types of habitat, confirming that the structure and composition of fish assemblages is mediated by a set of habitat characteristics forming an ecological mosaic. The highest species richness and relative abundance were found in the mangroves and reefs. The data demonstrated that some species, such as Lutjanus jocu, Lutjanus synagris, Carangoides bartholomaei, Eucinostomus argenteus and Eucinostomus melanopterus had clear ontogenetic shifts among habitats and across ecosystems. Some species (Sphoeroides greeley, L. synagris, and Eucinostomus gula) were widespread along the ecosystem-level gradient and were observed in a number of different habitats, reflecting more generalist habitat associations. By contrast, a large number of species (54; e.g., Ptereleotris randali, Decapterus macarellus and Mugil curema) were recorded in a single habitat type, indicating they were habitat specialists. Despite this apparent habitat-related pattern, the size-mediated relationships found in many species indicate cross-migration along the ecosystem gradient. Our findings have implications for the conservation and monitoring of fish assemblages highlighting the role of the connectivity of marine habitats as a conservation priority toward to an ecosystem-based management strategy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)