Search

Objectives: To explore the prevalence and clinical significance of low complement levels in patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS). Methods: We reviewed data from the "CAPS Registry" on C3 and/or C4 complement plasma protein levels during acute CAPS episodes. Patients were classified into those with low and normal complement levels. Data on clinical presentation, with special focus on thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) features, diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile were reviewed. The chi-square exact test was performed to evaluate differences between categorical data. Results: The "CAPS Registry" includes 566 patients with a total of 578 episodes of CAPS. Data on complement plasma protein levels was available in 73 episodes from the same number of patients. Low levels of C3 and/or C4 complement plasma proteins were detected in 42 (58%) CAPS episodes. Low complement levels were more common in SLE patients (55% SLE vs. 19% No SLE; p<0.001). The frequencies of clinical TMA (72% vs. 80%; p=0.4) or TMA syndrome (86% vs. 84%, p=0.9), frequency of triple aPL triple positivity (67% vs 33%; p=0.3), or the mortality (35% vs. 31%; p=0.7) were similar between low and normal complement groups. Conclusion: In our study, low levels of C3 and C4 plasma proteins are detected in 58% episodes of CAPS, which were not associated with clinical presentation including TMA features, aPL triple positivity, or mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatments for catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) rose from recommendations and consensus of international experts based on case series or case reports. We aimed to evaluate the treatment scheme with the best cost-effectiveness ratio associated with lower mortality as a high-impact clinical benefit. Methods: The CAPS Registry was used as our source of structured data on the different therapeutic strategies, their frequency, and their effectiveness (survival). Starting from around 50 different schemes, we identified those with a mortality of less than 33% within the 18 most frequently utilized. After applying the efficiency frontier method, we included two schemes to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis from the Colombian healthcare sector perspective. Scheme 1 (Glucocorticoids + Anticoagulation + Anti-aggregation + Intravenous IgG immunoglobulin) and scheme 2 (Glucocorticoids + Anticoagulation + Anti-aggregation + Plasma exchange) were compared in terms of costs and survival. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (Monte Carlo simulation) were conducted to evaluate model robustness and uncertainty. Results: Our analysis uses the information corresponding to 427 cases from the CAPS registry, the majority being women (68.8%), with a mean age of 45.7 years and bearing general mortality of 38.17% (female: 38.4%, male: 37.5%). Scheme 2 was the cost-effective strategy over scheme 1. The results were robust on discrete sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis (Monte Carlo simulation). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first economic evaluation focused on the treatment of CAPS. For the Colombian health system, schemes 1 and 2 have similar behavior; nevertheless, scheme 2 represents the best cost-effectiveness ratio. This treatment approach is highly susceptible to the allocation of resources by the system and beneficial in terms of health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]