Search

Objective: To assess the relationship between smoking exposure and organ damage accrual measured by Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus score (SLICC-SDI) in consecutive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from Argentina., Methods: 623 consecutive SLE patients (fulfilling ≥4, 1997 ACR criteria) were included in this cross-sectional study. Sociodemographic and disease related variables including SLICC-SDI score and smoking status were collected. Patients currently smoking were considered "smokers", and "non-smokers" those who never smoked and former smokers. SLICC-SDI was divided into two categories: <3 and ≥3 was defined as severe damage., Results: Six hundred and 23 patients were included in the analysis, 89% women. Eighty-four per cent were non-smokers and 16 % were current smokers 83 percent of patients had SLICC-SDI <3 and 17 % had SLICC-SDI ≥3. Twenty one percent of patients with SLICC-SDI ≥3 and 15% with <3 SLICC-SDI were current smokers ( p 0.081). In the multiple regression analysis, current smoking (OR 1.82, CI 95% 1.01-3.31, p 0.046), older age (OR 1.04, CI 95% 1.00-1.05, p 0.034), disease duration (OR 1.03, CI 95% 1.00-1.07, p 0.021) and cyclophosphamide exposure (OR 2.97, CI 95% 1.49-5.88, p 0.002) were related to SLICC-SDI ≥3., Conclusion: In our sample of patients, current smoking, older age, disease duration and cyclophosphamide were related to severe damage (SLICC-SDI ≥3)., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective The aim of this study was to measure presenteeism (productivity impairment while the patient is at work) and the related risk factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from Argentina. Methods A total of 130 consecutive (1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria) working patients with SLE were assessed using a standardized data collection form. Sociodemographic, disease and work-related variables were collected. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire was performed. Results Overall, 130 patients were included in the analysis; 91% were women, and the mean age was 39 years (range 19-77). A total of 43% were White, 43% Mestizo and 13% Amerindian. Overall, 38% were single and 38% were married. A total of 75% had more than 12 years of formal education. The median disease duration was 7 years (interquartile range 25-75 (IQR) 4-13). Median Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score was 0 (IQR 0-2), and median Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR Damage Index (SLICC-SDI) score was 0 (IQR 0-1). Lupus quality of life (LupusQoL) domains scores were: physical health 87 (IQR 70-96), emotional health 78 (IQR 54-91), burden to others 75 (IQR 50-92), intimate relationships 87 (IQR 50-100), and body image 85 (IQR 70-100). Absenteeism was 8%, presenteeism was 19%, and overall work impairment (absenteeism + presenteeism) was 26%. In the multiple regression analysis, considering presenteeism as dependent variable, (adjusting by age, disease duration, >12 years of education, Non-white race, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain, VAS fatigue, SLICC-SDI, LupusQoL, physical and emotional domains), we found that SLICC-SDI (odds ratio (OR) 1.68, confidence interval (CI) 1-2.7) and Non-white race (OR 3.27, CI 1.04-10) were related to presenteeism and >12 years of education (OR 0.30, CI 0.09-0.98) and higher scores of LupusQoL emotional health domain (OR 0.95, CI 0.92-0.98) were protective. Conclusions organ damage and Non-white race were significantly associated with presenteeism while >12 years of education and higher scores of LupusQoL emotional health domain were protective.

Menorrhagia is common in women receiving oral anticoagulation. In healthy women, reductions of up to 90% of menstrual loss have been described with the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS). However there is no data about the use of LNG-IUS in women receiving oral anticoagulation and so we assessed the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS in this setting. Patients with menorrhagia who used LNG-IUS and warfarin were contacted by post and asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the extent and duration of menstrual bleeding, quality of life and treatment satisfaction. The questionnaire was sent to 23 patients and returned by 17. The amount of bleeding was reduced with the LNG-IUS in 10 (58.8%) women; amenorrhea occurred in four (23.5%), no change in blood loss in one (5.9%) and greater blood loss in two (11.8%) patients. The number of sanitary pads used was less in 12 (70.6%) patients; same in one (5.9%) patient, more in two (11.8%) patients and two (11.8%) did not remember. Five patients (29.4%) had shorter duration of bleeding, four (23.5%) had amenorrhoea, four (23.5%) had longer periods and four (23.5%) had same duration by subjective assessment. Eight (47.1%) patients felt very satisfied, four (23.5%) felt satisfied, two (11.8%) felt dissatisfied with the treatment, one felt very dissatisfied (5.9%) and two (11.8%) did not respond to the question. This small study suggests LNG-IUS is effective in reducing the duration and amount of menstrual bleeding in women with menorrhagia associated with oral anticoagulation. We feel the use of LNG-IUS is a major advance in reducing menorrhagia in women on oral anticoagulation as the previous alternative--hysterectomy--is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding.