Search

Aims: Anaphylactic shock sometimes accompanies pulmonary vaso- and broncho-constriction. We previously reported the hemodynamic features of mouse anaphylaxis (Life Sci. 2014; 116: 98-105). However, the effects of anaphylactic chemical mediators on the hemodynamics of in vivo mice are not well known. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether the mediators exert the same directional actions. Therefore, we determined their effects systematically on total peripheral resistance (TPR), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), or airway pressure (AWP) in anesthetized mice., Main Methods: We measured directly pulmonary arterial pressure, left atrial pressure, systemic arterial pressure, central venous pressure and aortic blood flow to determine PVR and TPR, as well as AWP, following injections of platelet-activating factor (PAF), histamine, serotonin, leukotriene (LT) C4, and prostaglandin (PG) D2 in anesthetized open-chest artificially ventilated BALB/c mice., Key Findings: Consecutive administration of any agents increased PVR dose-dependently with the maximal responsiveness being PAF>LTC4>serotonin>>histamine=PGD2. Histamine caused a biphasic PVR response, an initial decrease, which was abolished by L-NAME, followed by an increase at high doses. PAF, serotonin, and histamine decreased TPR dose-dependently, while LTC4 or PGD2 yielded an increase or no change in TPR, respectively. Serotonin, but not the other agents, increased AWP., Significance: Anaphylactic mediators exert non-uniform actions on the pulmonary and systemic circulation and airway in anesthetized BALB/c mice: PAF, LTC4 and serotonin cause substantial pulmonary vasoconstriction, while histamine biphasic responses of the initial nitric oxide dependent vasodilation followed by vasoconstriction; PAF, serotonin, and histamine, but not LTC4 or PGD2, evoke systemic vasodilatation; only serotonin induces airway constriction., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Systemic anaphylaxis is life-threatening, and its pathophysiology is not fully clarified. Mice are frequently used for experimental study on anaphylaxis. However, the hemodynamic features and mechanisms of mouse anaphylactic hypotension remain unknown. Therefore, we determined mechanisms of systemic and pulmonary vascular response to anaphylactic hypotension in anesthetized BALB/c mice by using receptor antagonists of chemical mediators., Main Methods: Anaphylaxis was actively induced by an intravenous injection of the ovalbumin antigen into open-chest artificially ventilated sensitized mice. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), left atrial pressure, central venous pressure, and aortic blood flow (ABF) were continuously measured., Key Findings: In sensitized control mice, MAP and ABF showed initial, transient increases, followed by progressive decreases after the antigen injection. Total peripheral resistance (TPR) did not decrease, while PAP initially and transiently increased to 18.5±0.5mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) also significantly increased. The antigen-induced decreases in MAP and ABF were attenuated by pretreatment with either a platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor antagonist, CV6209, or a histamine H1 receptor antagonist, diphenhydramine, and were abolished by their combination. Diphenhydramine augmented the initial increases in PAP and PVR, but did not affect the decrease of the corresponding MAP fall. The antagonists of either leukotriene C4 or serotonin, alone or in combination with CV6209, exerted no significant effects., Significance: Mouse anaphylactic hypotension is caused by a decrease in cardiac output but not vasodilatation, via actions of PAF and histamine. The slight increase in PAP is not involved in mouse anaphylactic hypotension., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Oral administration of Lactobacillus casei reportedly reduces blood glucose concentrations in a non-insulin-dependent diabetic KK-Ay mouse model. In order to determine if other lactobacillus strains affect glucose metabolism, we evaluated the effect of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 (LJLa1) strain on glucose metabolism in rats. Oral administration of LJLa1 via drinking water for 2 weeks inhibited the hyperglycemia induced by intracranial injection of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG). We found that the hyperglucagonemic response induced by 2DG was also suppressed by LJLa1. Oral administration of LJLa1 for 2 weeks also reduced the elevation of blood glucose and glucagon levels after an oral glucose load in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. In addition, we recently observed that intraduodenal injection of LJLa1 reduced renal sympathetic nerve activity and enhanced gastric vagal nerve activity, suggesting that LJLa1 might affect glucose metabolism by changing autonomic nerve activity. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of intraduodenal administration of LJLa1 on adrenal sympathetic nerve activity (ASNA) in urethane-anesthetized rats, since the autonomic nervous system, including the adrenal sympathetic nerve, may be implicated in the control of the blood glucose levels. Indeed, we found that ASNA was suppressed by intraduodenal administration of LJLa1, suggesting that LJLa1 might improve glucose tolerance by reducing glucagon secretion via alteration of autonomic nerve activities.

A previous study of ours demonstrated that a high-fat diet (FAT) causes body fat accumulation, as well as elevation of plasma leptin level, renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), and blood pressure (BP). In the study reported here, we analyzed the role of leptin in these elevations of the RSNA and BP due to FAT feeding by assessing sympathetic and cardiovascular responses to intravenous (IV) administration of leptin in rats fed either a FAT or a high-carbohydrate diet (CHO). The results showed that baseline body fat, plasma leptin level, RSNA and BP were significantly higher in the FAT group than in the CHO group, and that IV administration of leptin elevated RSNA and plasma leptin levels but lowered BP in the CHO group. However, these effects of leptin were eliminated in the FAT group. These findings suggest that FAT-fed rats which expose basal elevation of plasma leptin levels, RSNA and BP might be hyposensitive to endogenous leptin. Therefore, leptin resistance appeared obviously in FAT-induced hypertension might indicate that leptin is implicated in generating the elevation of RSNA and BP induced by long-term FAT feeding.

The elevation of renal sympathetic nervous activity (SNA) is a possible cause of blood pressure (BP) elevation. Although a high-fat diet (FAT) often induces BP elevation in animals, the effect of FAT on renal SNA in animals is not consistent between studies. Thus, we compared the basal levels of efferent renal SNA and BP in FAT- or high-carbohydrate diet (CHO)-fed rats. Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed FAT (P/F/C=20/45/35% cal) or CHO (20/5/75) from 5 weeks of age. After 20-21 weeks of feeding, a 24-h urine sample was collected to measure sodium excretion. The next day, blood (0.2 ml) was withdrawn from a femoral artery, and basal efferent renal nerve discharges and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded under anesthesia. Immediately after the experiment, abdominal (epididymal, perirenal and mesenteric) adipose tissues were dissected. Total abdominal fat weight was significantly greater in the FAT group than in the CHO group. The plasma level of leptin was significantly higher in the FAT group, but blood glucose and plasma insulin levels did not differ between the two groups. MAP and renal SNA were significantly higher in the FAT group. In addition, the ratio of urinary sodium excretion to dietary sodium intake was significantly lower in the FAT group than in the CHO group. The data suggest that the increased renal SNA may contribute to BP elevation in FAT-fed rats. The present study firstly demonstrated that renal SNA was elevated with FAT-related BP elevation.