Search

The size of window openings is widely acknowledged as an important factor in our spatial perception. However, little is known about how the perception and preference of windows changes between countries, leaving a gap of knowledge regarding the applicability of research findings across latitudes. This article presents the outcomes of a study investigating regional differences in the perception of spaces with varying window size (small, medium, and large), space size (small and large), spatial context (working and social), and sky type (overcast and two types of clear sky). As the regional differences were the main studied factor, the study was performed in Norway, Switzerland, and Greece, representing northern, central, and southern European latitudes, respectively, and used virtual reality as a means to replicate the same experiment in different locations. In total, 406 participants evaluated eight spatial attributes using an 11-point Likert-type scale. Results indicated that regional differences could be observed in the participants' responses, with significant differences in how pleasant and calm the space was perceived, found not only between participants in Greece and Norway in all the studied window sizes, but also between Greece and Switzerland for the medium and large windows, indicating that even small variations in latitude within Europe can affect the spatial perception. The findings of this study reveal that spaces with specific fenestration characteristics might not induce the same response across different latitudes in Europe, and thus, have important implications for daylighting and architectural design, which would motivate the use of region-specific parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daylight provision to the indoor space is affected by different building elements that cannot be fully controlled by the users, such as the window size of a space. The dimensions of the fenestration not only affect the lighting levels, but they also affect how the space is perceived by its users. The present study examines three different window sizes via virtual reality, to study how they affect the perception of both a small and a large space at high latitudes. Additionally, two context scenarios (socializing and working), as well as three different sky types (overcast sky and clear skies with either high or low sun angle) were evaluated. The experimental study applied a mixed design with within-subjects and between-subjects factors. A total of 150 participants evaluated the scenes using a Likert-type scale to rate eight different subjective attributes. The statistical results showed that both window size and space type significantly affect the participants' spatial perception, as well as their satisfaction with the amount of outside view. Larger windows led to more positively evaluated spaces for all studied attributes. Moreover, a significant interaction was found between window size and type of space for the satisfaction with the amount of view in the space, indicating that the window size was dependent on the type of space in which the windows are located. Specifically, the window sizes were rated higher in the small space than in the large space for the evaluation of amount of view. The findings show that window size affects how people perceive a space, and additionally, that other spatial features, such as space type, affect window size preferences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the combined effect of indoor temperature (19 °C, 22 °C, and 26 °C) and colored glazing (blue, orange, and neutral) on visual perception of daylight. Experiments were performed in an office-like test room, in which 75 participants were fully immersed under visual and thermal stimuli. Findings are discussed in terms of cross-modal effects of indoor temperature on visual perception, as well as of unimodal effects of glazing color on visual perception, investigated in terms of color of light and visual environment evaluations. Results show the presence of cross-modal effects of indoor temperature on visual perception of both the visual environment and the color of light. Indoor temperature affected the visual environment evaluation as, first, brightness comfort resulted higher at lower temperatures, and second, the light was associated to warmth adjectives more often at higher temperatures. On the other hand, indoor temperature influenced the color of light evaluation as, only at lower temperatures, daylight tinted by the blue glazing was considered less pleasant and less comfortable, and was chosen less often over the daylight tinted by the orange glazing. In terms of unimodal effect of colored glazing on visual perception, results indicate that the neutral glazing was always preferred over the two colored ones, probably due to the use of saturated colors. The orange glazing, however, was associated with the most relaxing and warmest daylight. These findings have important implications regarding the use of glazing with saturated colors in buildings and expand our understanding of temperature–color interaction – so far investigated only with electric light – to daylight evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a novel experimental method that uses a virtual reality (VR) headset, aiming to provide an alternative environment for the conduction of subjective assessments of daylit spaces. This method can overcome the difficulty of controlling the variation of luminous conditions, one of the main challenges in experimental studies using daylight, and its novelty lies in the implementation of physically based renderings into an immersive virtual environment. The present work investigates the adequacy of the proposed method to evaluate five aspects of subjective perception of daylit spaces: the perceived pleasantness, interest, excitement, complexity, and satisfaction with the amount of view in the space. To this end, experiments with 29 participants were conducted to compare users' perceptions of a real daylit environment and its equivalent representation in VR and test the effect of the display method on the participants' perceptual evaluations, reported physical symptoms, and perceived presence in the virtual space. The results indicate a high level of perceptual accuracy, showing no significant differences between the real and virtual environments on the studied evaluations. In addition, there was a high level of perceived presence in the virtual environment and no significant effects on the participants' physical symptoms after the use of the VR headset. Following these findings, the presented experimental method in VR seems very promising for use as a surrogate to real environments in investigating the aforementioned five dimensions of perception in daylit spaces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]