Search

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of Asian patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and to determine the role of rituximab in this entity. Forty-one consecutive patients from 1997 to 2009 were included: 14 received CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone), while 27 more recently treated patients received CHOP with rituximab (R-CHOP). All patients with a complete or partial response received consolidation involved field radiotherapy (RT). After a median follow-up of 31.2 months (104.4 months for CHOP and 28.8 months for R-CHOP), the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for R-CHOP- and CHOP-treated patients were 87% vs. 57% and 88% vs. 36%, respectively. R-CHOP resulted in an improvement of PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 8.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-30.74, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 4.20, 95% CI 1.05-16.8, p = 0.04). Nineteen patients had positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) evaluation after six cycles of R-CHOP (metabolic complete response 13, partial metabolic response five, and metabolic progression one). All five patients with a metabolic partial response received RT instead of intensive salvage chemotherapy; four remained progression-free. In patients with PMBCL, R-CHOP in combination with involved field radiotherapy portended a 3-year OS rate of 87%, which is comparable to historical survival rates with more intensive chemotherapy regimens.

Natural killer (NK) lymphomas occurring more frequently in the Far East and South America respond poorly to anthracycline-based regimens. Here we report an in vivo NK lymphoma xenograft (NK-S1) derived from the testicular metastasis of a patient with an extranodal NK lymphoma (nasal type). The NK-S1 xenograft, established in severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mice retained the same imunophenotypic features as the original tumor. NK-S1 disseminated intra-abdominally to the testis, intestine and liver. Although doxorubicin, rapamycin, bevacizumab, rapamycin-doxorubicin, and bevacizumab-doxorubicin had no effects on the growth of subcutaneous NK-S1 xenografts, intraperitoneal (IP) delivery of cyclophosphamide caused complete tumor regression; this tumor regression was associated with apoptosis, upregulation of activated caspase-3, and cleaved Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). In an IP model of NK lymphoma, cyclophosphamide also prolonged the survival of mice and potently inhibited tumor dissemination and ascites formation. Our data suggest that the NK-S1 xenograft is a useful tool for screening preclinical drugs, and cyclophosphamide may be a useful drug for the treatment of this disease.

This study attempted to evaluate the usefulness of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) as a prognostic model in patients treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin and prednisolone) chemotherapy. We compared 279 patients with DLBCL. Among them, 183 received CHOP while 96 received R-CHOP. Results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of both the patient and the lymphoma characteristics. The estimated 2-year survival was significantly higher among patients treated with R-CHOP compared to CHOP alone (85.6% vs. 64.7%, P = 0.004). Both the IPI and age-adjusted IPI were less useful as prognostic models in patients receiving R-CHOP compared to CHOP. In the multivariate analysis, age >or= 60, elevated serum LDH, low serum albumin and advanced stages of disease were each independently associated with decreased survival in patients treated with CHOP. In contrast, among those treated with R-CHOP, only male sex and advanced stage of disease were each independently associated with decreased survival. Using these two factors, patients treated with R-CHOP could be separated into three prognostic groups with 5-year estimated survival ranging from 47% to 100% (P < 0.0001). In summary, we can conclude that with the significant improvement in survival following the use of rituximab, the relevance of previously recognized prognostic factors has to be reassessed and re-evaluated.