1. Improving efficiency and sensitivity: European Research Initiative in CLL (ERIC) update on the international harmonised approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in CLL.
- Author
-
Rawstron, A C, Böttcher, S, Letestu, R, Villamor, N, Fazi, C, Kartsios, H, de Tute, R M, Shingles, J, Ritgen, M, Moreno, C, Lin, K, Pettitt, A R, Kneba, M, Montserrat, E, Cymbalista, F, Hallek, M, Hillmen, P, and Ghia, P
- Subjects
CHRONIC lymphocytic leukemia ,CYTOMETRY ,IMMUNOGLOBULINS ,CHRONIC diseases - Abstract
Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is becoming increasingly important as treatments improve. An internationally harmonised four-colour (CLR) flow cytometry MRD assay is widely used but has limitations. The aim of this study was to improve MRD analysis by identifying situations where a less time-consuming CD19/CD5/κ/λ analysis would be sufficient for detecting residual CLL, and develop a six-CLR antibody panel that is more efficient for cases requiring full MRD analysis. In 784 samples from CLL patients after treatment, it was possible to determine CD19/CD5/κ/λ thresholds that identified cases with detectable MRD with 100% positive predictive value (PPV). However, CD19/CD5/κ/λ analysis was unsuitable for predicting iwCLL/NCI response status or identifying cases with no detectable MRD. For the latter cases requiring a full MRD assessment, a six-CLR assay was designed comprising CD19/CD5/CD20 with (1) CD3/CD38/CD79b and (2) CD81/CD22/CD43. There was good correlation between four-CLR and six-CLR panels in dilution studies and clinical samples, with 100% concordance for detection of residual disease at the 0.01% (10
−4 ) level (n=59) and good linearity even at the 0.001-0.01% (10−5 -10−4 ) level. A six-CLR panel therefore provides equivalent results to the four-CLR panel but it requires fewer reagents, fewer cells and a much simpler analysis approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF