Search

We investigated the utility of a pediatric-inspired protocol in adults aged 18–40 years with standard-riskBCR-ABLnegative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Retrospective outcomes of 25 patients treated with a pediatric protocol between 2008 and 2014 were compared with 22 similarly aged patients treated with an adult protocol between 2003 and 2008. Twenty-five (100%) and 19 (86%) patients achieved complete remission, respectively. At median follow-up of 36.8 months, 3-year event-free survival was increased in patients on the pediatric protocol at 80% versus 45% (p = .019). There was a trend toward improved overall survival at 80% versus 59% (p = .12). Treatment-related toxicity was not increased despite the increased treatment intensity. Patients withBCRand/orABLcopy number variation demonstrated comparatively poorer outcomes in both cohorts. In our experience with this cohort of patients, pediatric-based protocols are safe and effective, justifying their use in younger adults with ALL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has changed with the advent of thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, the so-called novel agents (NAs). Given the complexity of MM therapy in the NA era we pursued a population based study to assess for improvements in survival as well as to characterize the relevance of early relapse (within 12 months) and the International Staging System in this clinical setting. We reviewed our experience with 460 patients with MM treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) between 1988 and 2008, of whom 306 had relapsed. The cohort was divided into two groups based upon relapse pre-2004 and relapse during/after 2004 (2004+), which correlated to availability of bortezomib and lenalidomide. Improvements in both overall survival (OS) (median 32.0 months vs. 71.8 months; p < 0.001) and post-relapse survival (PRS) (median 15.2 months vs. 42.8 months; p < 0.001) correlated with the NA era. Exposure to NAs conferred a better PRS (median 35.7 months vs. 9.1 months; p < 0.001). Although all patients had improvements in survival, those who relapsed late continued to do better. Lastly, in the NA era, the ISS remains an important prognostic tool in relapse, but only in the late relapsing cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]