Search

Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents, excluding Down's syndrome: improved outcome with intensified induction treatment

We reviewed the clinical features, treatment, and outcome of 100 children with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) associated with complete monosomy 7 (-7) or deletion of the long arm of chromosome 7 (7q-). Patients with therapy-induced disease were excluded. The morphologic diagnoses according to modified FAB criteria were: MDS in 72 (refractory anemia (RA) in 11, RA with excess of blasts (RAEB) in eight, RAEB in transformation (RAEB-T) in 10, JMML in 43), and AML in 28. The median age at presentation was 2.8 years (range 2 months to 15 years), being lowest in JMML (1.1 year). Loss of chromosome 7 as the sole cytogenetic abnormality was observed in 75% of those with MDS compared with 32% of those with AML. Predisposing conditions (including familial MDS/AML) were found in 20%. Three-year survival was 82% in RA, 63% in RAEB, 45% in JMML, 34% in AML, and 8% in RAEB-T. Children with -7 alone had a superior survival than those with other cytogenetic abnormalities: this was solely due to a better survival in MDS (3-year survival 56 vs 24%). The reverse was found in AML (3-year survival 13% in -7 alone vs 44% in other cytogenetic groups). Stable disease for several years was documented in more than half the patients with RA or RAEB. Patients with RA, RAEB or JMML treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) without prior chemotherapy had a 3-year survival of 73%. The morphologic diagnosis was the strongest prognostic factor. Only patients with a diagnosis of JMML fitted what has previously been referred to as the monosomy 7 syndrome. Our data give no support to the concept of monosomy 7 as a distinct syndrome.

Recently, we defined “CML-like” subtype of BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), resembling lymphoid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Here we retrospectively analyzed prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) and other features in 147 children with BCR::ABL1-positive ALL (diagnosed I/2000–IV/2021, treated according to EsPhALL (n = 133) or other (n = 14) protocols), using DNA-based monitoring of BCR::ABL1 genomic breakpoint and clonal immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. Although overall prognosis of CML-like (n = 48) and typical ALL (n = 99) was similar (5-year-EFS 60% and 49%, respectively; 5-year-OS 75% and 73%, respectively), typical ALL presented more relapses while CML-like patients more often died in the first remission. Prognostic role of MRD was significant in the typical ALL (p = 0.0005 in multivariate analysis for EFS). In contrast, in CML-like patients MRD was not significant (p values > 0.2) and inapplicable for therapy adjustment. Moreover, in the typical ALL, risk-prediction could be further improved by considering initial hyperleukocytosis. Early distinguishing typical BCR::ABL1-positive ALL and CML-like patients is essential to enable optimal treatment approach in upcoming protocols. For the typical ALL, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and concurrent chemotherapy with risk-directed intensity should be recommended; in the CML-like disease, no relevant prognostic feature applicable for therapy tailoring was found so far.

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin is a CD22-directed antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, approved in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Patients aged 1–18 years, with R/R CD22 + BCP-ALL were treated at the RP2D of 1.8 mg/m2. Using a single-stage design, with an overall response rate (ORR) ≤ 30% defined as not promissing and ORR > 55% as expected, 25 patients needed to be recruited to achieve 80% power at 0.05 significance level. Thirty-two patients were enrolled, 28 were treated, 27 were evaluable for response. The estimated ORR was 81.5% (95%CI: 61.9–93.7%), and 81.8% (18/22) of the responding subjects were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. The study met its primary endpoint. Median follow up of survivors was 16 months (IQR: 14.49–20.07). One year Event Free Survival was 36.7% (95% CI: 22.2–60.4%), and Overall Survival was 55.1% (95% CI: 39.1−77.7%). Eighteen patients received consolidation (with HSCT and/or CAR T-cells therapy). Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) occurred in seven patients. MRD negativity seemed correlated to calicheamicin sensitivity in vitro, but not to CD22 surface expression, saturation, or internalization. InO was effective in this population. The most relevant risk was the occurrence of SOS, particularly when InO treatment was followed by HSCT.

Deficiency of the transcription factor GATA2 is a highly penetrant genetic disorder predisposing to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and immunodeficiency. It has been recognized as the most common cause underlying primary MDS in children. Triggered by the discovery of a recurrent synonymous GATA2 variant, we systematically investigated 911 patients with phenotype of pediatric MDS or cellular deficiencies for the presence of synonymous alterations in GATA2. In total, we identified nine individuals with five heterozygous synonymous mutations: c.351C>G, p.T117T (N = 4); c.649C>T, p.L217L; c.981G>A, p.G327G; c.1023C>T, p.A341A; and c.1416G>A, p.P472P (N = 2). They accounted for 8.2% (9/110) of cases with GATA2 deficiency in our cohort and resulted in selective loss of mutant RNA. While for the hotspot mutation (c.351C>G) a splicing error leading to RNA and protein reduction was identified, severe, likely late stage RNA loss without splicing disruption was found for other mutations. Finally, the synonymous mutations did not alter protein function or stability. In summary, synonymous GATA2 substitutions are a new common cause of GATA2 deficiency. These findings have broad implications for genetic counseling and pathogenic variant discovery in Mendelian disorders.

Correction to: Leukemia (2016); 30(5), 1184–1187; doi:10.1038/leu.2015.246 Following the publication of this article the authors noted that the labels in Figures 1b and d have been switched. The correct labels in Figure 1b are; mixed lineage leukemia rearranged (MLL rearranged; dotted line) and unknown (thin solid line).