Search

The wide discrepancies in the frequency of ‘positive’ samples for multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype within the same type of tumor observed in the literature justified the need for the definition of consensus recommendations. To define standard techniques of MDR phenotype measurement, we ran a large multicentric evaluation of the different methods available. Thirty-six French centers participated in the study, and 742 samples of 2–10 × 106 viable cells were sent by overnight express mail between December 1993 and February 1996. The same batches of MRK16, 4E3 and UIC2 were used. Nineteen samples of leukemia (12 AML, 1 ALL, 6 lymphoproliferative syndromes) and six leukemic cell lines with different levels of MDR expression were tested. Five meetings reached agreement concerning the guidelines for each technique, except immunocytochemistry. The 19 fresh samples were tested by each center using one to four techniques among cytofluorometry, immunocytochemistry, functional tests and RT-PCR. Five samples were diagnosed as ‘negative’ according to local criteria, with few discordant results (0 to 16% of ‘positive’ results). For all the 14 remaining samples, large discrepancies were observed from center to center, and from one technique to another. No correlations could be found between techniques. Flow cytometric analysis of cells already exposed to MRK16 or control IgG2A, fixed in paraformaldehyde and sent to centers did not reduce the discrepancies between centers in two of the four samples with moderate expression, emphasizing the role of histogram interpretation. The use of alternative monoclonal antibodies (4E3 and UIC2) did not reduce the discrepancies observed. In a second step, the K562 parental cell line, a low resistant subline (K562/HHT100, ×7 resistance index to DNR) and a high resistant subline (K562/HHT300, ×125 resistance index to DNR) were sent blindly three times, with an increasing level of recommendations for flow cytometry. Dramatic improvements were observed in cytometric results when the result was expressed as the ratio of arithmetic mean of fluorescence of antibody (10 μg of MRK16)/arithmetic mean of fluorescence of control (10 μ g IgG2A): the proportion of expected results increased from 61 to 100% for K562, and from 37 to 85% for K562/HHT100. For uptake and drug efflux measurements, the use of 1 h uptake of 0.1μ M of rhodamine, followed by 1 h efflux ±10 μ M of verapamil, permitted an increased reproducibility of the technique from 71 to 100% for K562 and K562/HHT100. Whatever the technique used, concordant results were obtained for K562/HHT300. The immunocytochemistry, using several antibodies (MRK16, JSB1 and C219) gave many non-interpretable results (44%), due to a frequent high background and discordant results between antibodies in the same centers, and discordant conclusions between centers. The group does not recommend this technique for circulating tumoral cells.

The wide discrepancies in the frequency of 'positive' samples for multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype within the same type of tumor observed in the literature justified the need for the definition of consensus recommendations. To define standard techniques of MDR phenotype measurement, we ran a large multicentric evaluation of the different methods available. Thirty-six French centers participated in the study, and 742 samples of 2-10 x 10(6) viable cells were sent by overnight express mail between December 1993 and February 1996. The same batches of MRK16, 4E3 and UIC2 were used. Nineteen samples of leukemia (12 AML, 1 ALL, 6 lymphoproliferative syndromes) and six leukemic cell lines with different levels of MDR expression were tested. Five meetings reached agreement concerning the guidelines for each technique, except immunocytochemistry. The 19 fresh samples were tested by each center using one to four techniques among cytofluorometry, immunocytochemistry, functional tests and RT-PCR. Five samples were diagnosed as 'negative' according to local criteria, with few discordant results (0 to 16% of 'positive' results). For all the 14 remaining samples, large discrepancies were observed from center to center, and from one technique to another. No correlations could be found between techniques. Flow cytometric analysis of cells already exposed to MRK16 or control IgG2A, fixed in paraformaldehyde and sent to centers did not reduce the discrepancies between centers in two of the four samples with moderate expression, emphasizing the role of histogram interpretation. The use of alternative monoclonal antibodies (4E3 and UIC2) did not reduce the discrepancies observed. In a second step, the K562 parental cell line, a low resistant subline (K562/HHT100, x7 resistance index to DNR) and a high resistant subline (K562/HHT300, x125 resistance index to DNR) were sent blindly three times, with an increasing level of recommendations for flow cytometry. Dramatic improvements were observed in cytometric results when the result was expressed as the ratio of arithmetic mean of fluorescence of antibody (10 microg of MRK16)/arithmetic mean of fluorescence of control (10 microg IgG2A): the proportion of expected results increased from 61 to 100% for K562, and from 37 to 85% for K562/HHT100. For uptake and drug efflux measurements, the use of 1 h uptake of 0.1 microM of rhodamine, followed by 1 h efflux +/-10 microM of verapamil, permitted an increased reproducibility of the technique from 71 to 100% for K562 and K562/HHT100. Whatever the technique used, concordant results were obtained for K562/HHT300. The immunocytochemistry, using several antibodies (MRK16, JSB1 and C219) gave many non-interpretable results (44%), due to a frequent high background and discordant results between antibodies in the same centers, and discordant conclusions between centers. The group does not recommend this technique for circulating tumoral cells.

Since there is no consensus on the techniques for multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype evaluation, many discrepancies concerning the importance and frequency of mdr1 gene expression in leukemias and solid tumors are observed in the literature. In order to establish an inter-laboratory consensus in France, a multicenter study was carried out to propose further guidelines for MDR phenotype evaluation. The techniques used by the 38 laboratories participating in the trial were: immunodetection (immunohisto and/or cytochemistry, flow cytometry), functional tests, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or Northern blot. We present the results obtained by 19 laboratories concerning the measurement of mdr1 gene expression assessed by RT-PCR or Northern blot in: (1)19 samples of tumor cells obtained from leukemic patients; (2) six solid tumor samples obtained at surgery; (3) eight cell lines exhibiting variable levels of resistance, and; (4)10 preparations of RNA and of cDNA obtained from solid tumors. Standardization of the RT-PCR technique and preliminary results comparing RT-PCR with immunohistochemistry in solid tumors are also reported.

Peripheral blood samples from 18 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemias (CLL) who were either untreated but who were later sensitive to chlorambucil (CLL S) or resistant to a combination containing doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and prednisone (CLL R) were studied for glutathione system, P-glycoprotein, PCNA and topoisomerase II expression. P-glycoprotein expression detected by an immunocytochemical technique using MRK 16 antibody was present at the same level in CLL S and CLL R. The percentage of cells positive for P-gp was below 5% in all samples tested. Topoisomerase IIalpha level was quantified by Western blot analysis. None of the 18 CLL samples had detectable topoisomerase IIalpha protein. In addition, 12 CLL were tested for PCNA staining and no samples had more than 1% of positive cells at immunocytochemical detection indicating that CLL cells were not engaged in the cell cycle. Some differences were found between CLL S and CLL R in the glutathione system. Glutathione concentration (GSH) and GST activity was the same in CLL S and CLL R. The glutathione-S-transferase (GST) isoenzyme profile was different in the two CLL groups. The mean GST-pi and GST-alpha quantitation were twice as high as in CLL R compared to CLL S, but this difference did not reach statistical significance because of large variations between CLL samples. A significant correlation was observed between GST-pi expression and GST activity using CDNB as the substrate. GST-mu was detected in only one of seven CLL before therapy and in six of 11 resistant to chemotherapy. No correlation was found between P-glycoprotein expression, GST activity and the different GST isoenzymes studied. These results suggest that the glutathione system could play a role in the resistance of anticancer agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The role of the other drug resistance mechanisms (P-glycoprotein and topoisomerase IIalpha) seems to be of limited importance.

SDZ PSC 833, a non-immunosuppressive cyclosporin analogue reverses multidrug resistance (MDR) in vitro by inhibiting P-glycoprotein (P-gp) mediated drug efflux. We performed a dose escalation study of SDZ PSC 833 combined with VAD chemotherapy in refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Twenty-two MM patients who were refractory to doxorubicin/vincristine/dexamethasone (VADr, n=11) or had failed multiple regimens (n=6) or were melphalan-refractory (MELr, n=5), were treated with one to three cycles of VAD combined with oral SDZ PSC 833, which was administered at escalating dosages starting at 5 mg/kg/day to 15 mg/kg/day for 7 days. The median trough and peak blood levels of SDZ PSC 833 ranged from 461/1134 ng/ml at 5 mg/kg/day to 821/2663 ng/ml at 15 mg/kg, respectively. With addition of SDZ PSC 833 (5 mg/kg) the mean plasma AUC 0--96 h of doxorubicin as compared with control patients treated with VAD increased from 779 to 1510 ng/ml/h (P=0.0071), while the doxorubicin clearance was reduced from 47.6 to 27.8 l/h/m2 (P=0.0002). The clearance of doxorubicinol was reduced accordingly. Because of the increased plasma AUC, the dose of doxorubicin and vincristine had to be reduced in 13 patients to 50% (n=1) or 75% (n=12). A further dose-escalation of SDZ PSC 833 did not lead to a proportional increase of doxorubicin AUC. Toxicity WHO CTC grade 2 or 3 included hypoplasia (18/22), constipation (10/22), hyponatremia (3/22) and infections (6/22). A partial response or stable disease was achieved in eight and six patients, respectively. In 17 evaluable patients the mean percentage of pretreatment bone marrow plasma cells which expressed P-glycoprotein was 40%. The pretreatment in vitro rhodamin retention in CD38++ myeloma cells was reversible by 2 microM SDZ PSC 833 with 15-98% in 7/9 tested patients. In 4/5 responding patients analyzed before and after treatment with VAD + SDZ PSC 833, a reduction of P-gp + plasma cells was observed. It is concluded, that the blood concentrations of SDZ PSC 833 attained in MM patients increase with dose after oral administration. It can be safely combined with VAD chemotherapy. SDZ PSC 833 diminishes the clearance of doxorubicin, leading to an increase of the plasma AUC of doxorubicin. In addition, it is an effective inhibitor of P-gp mediated efflux of doxorubicin in myeloma tumor cells in vitro. Therefore, a proportional dose-reduction of doxorubicin and vincristine is warranted. Phase II/III studies in refractory MM are in progress to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of SDZ PSC 833 with VAD.

The in vitro daunorubicin (DNR) cell uptake was investigated by flow cytometry in K562/DOX resistant cell line and in 42 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The proportion of cells able to take up DNR was higher in untreated patients (50% +/- 30) than in previously treated patients (31% +/- 31) (p = 0.04). We noted a good correlation (p0.001) between the drug uptake after exposure to 0.1 microM DNR and achievement of complete remission. Cyclosporin A (CsA, 1 microgram/ml) and verapamil (5 micrograms/ml), but not cefoperazone (10 mM), completely reversed (CsA) or partially reversed (verapamil) the DNR efflux from K562/DOX mdr1(+) cell line. CsA significantly increased (p0.01) the DNR uptake of fresh leukemic cells, but not consistently, with no relationship to mdr1 mRNA cellular level. This absence of correlation was explained by the fact that several patients with no mdr1 gene expression exhibited a low in vitro DNR uptake, showing that the MDR phenotype is not the only mechanism responsible for the alteration of DNR pharmacokinetics in AML.