Search

In temporal discriminations tasks, more than one stimulus may function as a time marker. We studied two of them in a matching-to-sample task, the sample keylight and the houselight that signaled the intertrial interval (ITI). One group of pigeons learned a symmetrical matching-to-sample task with two samples (2 s or 18 s of a center keylight) and two comparisons (red and green side keys), whereas another group of pigeons learned an asymmetrical matching-to-sample task with three samples (2 s, 6 s, and 18 s) and two comparisons (red and green). In the asymmetrical task, 6-s and 18-s samples shared the same comparison. In a subsequent retention test, both groups showed a preference for the comparison associated with the longer samples, a result consistent with the hypothesis that pigeons based their choices on the duration elapsed since the offset of the houselight (i.e., sample duration + retention interval). Results from two no-sample tests further corroborated the importance of the ITI illumination as a time marker: When the ITI was illuminated, the proportion of choices correlated positively with the retention interval; when the ITI was darkened, choices fell to random levels. However, the absolute value of choice proportions suggested that the sample stimulus was also a time marker. How multiple stimuli acquire control over behavior and how they combine remains to be worked out., This work was conducted at the Psychology Research Centre, University of Minho, and was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science through national funds, and when applicable co-financed by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (UID/PSI/01662/2013). This work was also supported by a FCT Doctoral Grant (SFRH/BD/78566/2011) to Carlos Pinto and a FCT Grant (PTDC/MHC-PCN/3540/2012) to Armando Machado., info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

In two experiments, we investigated emergent conditional relations in pigeons using a symbolic matching-to-sample task with temporal stimuli as the samples and hues as the comparisons. Both experiments comprised three phases. In Phase I, pigeons learned to choose a red keylight (R) but not a green keylight (G) after a 1-s signal. They also learned to choose G but not R after a 4-s signal. In Phase II, correct responding consisted of choosing a blue keylight (B) after a 4-s signal and a yellow keylight (Y) after a 16-s signal. Comparisons G and B were both related to the same 4-s sample, whereas comparisons R and Y had no common sample. In Phase III, R and G were presented as samples, and B and Y were presented as the comparisons. The choice of B was correct following G, and the choice of Y was correct following R. If a relation between comparisons that shared a common sample were to emerge, then responding to B given G would be more likely than responding to Y given R. The results were generally consistent with this prediction, suggesting, for the first time in pigeons, the emergence of novel relations that involve temporal stimuli as nodal samples., This research was supported by doctoral grants to E.M.H. (FAPESP 60678-4/05 and CAPES 0103/08 0) and S.M.V. (CNPq 142544/2005-1 and CAPES 4457 07 2). G.Y.T. and D.G.d.S. were supported by a research productivity fellowship from The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil). A.D.M. was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). All of the Brazilian authors are currently affiliated with the National Institute of Science and Technology on Behavior, Cognition and Teaching, supported by FAPESP (Grant No. 08/57705-8) and CNPq (Grant No. 573972/2008-7). The data were collected in the Animal Learning and Behavior Laboratory, University of Minho, Portugal, and were presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Psychology (SBP), Goiania, Brazil, in October 2009. E.M.H. is currently a college professor at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais., info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Two theories of timing, scalar expectancy theory (SET) and learning-to-time (LeT), make substantially different assumptions about what animals learn in temporal tasks. In a test of these assumptions, pigeons learned two temporal discriminations. On Type 1 trials, they learned to choose a red key after a 1-sec signal and a green key after a 4-sec signal; on Type 2 trials, they learned to choose a blue key after a 4-sec signal and a yellow key after either an 8-sec signal (Group 8) or a 16-sec signal (Group 16). Then, the birds were exposed to signals 1 sec, 4 sec, and 16 sec in length and given a choice between novel key combinations (red or green vs. blue or yellow). The choice between the green key and the blue key was of particular significance because both keys were associated with the same 4-sec signal. Whereas SET predicted no effect of the test signal duration on choice, LeT predicted that preference for green would increase monotonically with the length of the signal but would do so faster for Group 8 than for Group 16. The results were consistent with LeT, but not with SET.