Search

Objective: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition introduced distinct clinical and pathological staging paradigms for human papilloma virus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Treatment planning for OPSCC often utilizes positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to assess clinical stage. We hypothesize that PET/CT will accurately predict final pathologic AJCC 8th edition staging in patients with HPV+ OPSCC., Methods: All patients with primary HPV+ OPSCC with preoperative PET/CT who underwent transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection between 2011 and 2017 were identified. Data were collected via chart review. Two neuroradiologists performed blinded re-evaluation of all scans. Primary tumor size and cervical nodal disease characteristics were recorded and TNM staging was extrapolated. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to assess interrater reliability. Test for symmetry was performed to analyze discordance between radiologic and pathologic staging., Results: Forty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Interrater reliability was substantial between radiologists for nodal (N) and overall staging (OS) (κ = 0.715 and 0.715). Radiologist A review resulted in identical OS for 67% of patients, overstaging for 31%, and understaging for 2%. Radiologist B review resulted in 61% identical OS, 39% overstaging, and 0% understaging. In misclassified cases, the test of symmetry shows strong bias toward overstaging N stage and OS (P < .001). Radiologic interpretation of extracapsular extension showed poor interrater reliability (κ = 0.403) and poor accuracy., Conclusion: PET/CT predicts a higher nodal and overall stage than pathologic staging. PET/CT should not be relied upon for initial tumor staging, as increased FDG uptake is not specific for nodal metastases. PET/CT is shown to be a poor predictor of ECE., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1535-1541, 2021., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: We have seen several incidences of catastrophic bleeding in patients with advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated nonoperatively. Aside from advanced disease, these patients have not had traditional risk factors for major hemorrhage., Study Design: Retrospective chart review., Methods: Patients treated nonoperatively for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were compared to determine characteristics that may predisposed to bleeding. Five patients with bleeding were identified and compared with a cohort of stage- and treatment-matched patients without bleeding. Blinded imaging review was performed to characterize the tumor site and its relationship to vasculature using standardized systems., Results: Comparing the bleeder versus nonbleeder groups pre-treatment, the bleeder group had larger tumors (15.4 vs. 8.3 cm 2 ), greater rates of parapharyngeal fat effacement (80% vs. 20%), and always involved the facial artery. Post-treatment, endophytic ulcerated tumor beds occurred in 100% of bleeders versus 0% of nonbleeders., Conclusions: Catastrophic oropharyngeal bleeding may be encountered after cytoreductive therapy. Large deeply invasive tumors seem to set the necessary circumstances. Rapid vascular control with interventional radiology has been largely effective therapy., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1049-1052, 2021., (© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, “The Triological Society” and American Laryngological Association (ALA).)

Objective: To determine the accuracy of pretreatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of extracapsular spread (ECS) in cervical lymph node metastases from p16-positive head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)., Study Design: Retrospective observational study., Methods: Sixty-five (n = 65) patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with p16-positive HNSCC and with cervical lymph node metastases measuring at least 1 centimeter in diameter on pathological assessment were included. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Subjects' preoperative contrast-enhanced neck CT scans were independently assigned a score for the likelihood of ECS (5-point scale) by two board-certified neuroradiologists. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated, and optimal sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each radiologist., Results: On histological analysis, the majority of patients (58%; 38/65) were found to have ECS, and 29% (19/65) of patients had ≥ three metastatic lymph nodes. For radiologist 1, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 72% (95% confidence interval (CI), 53%-87%) and 53% (95% CI, 36%-70%), respectively. For radiologist 2, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 82% (95% CI, 60 %-95%) and 53% (95% CI, 38%-69%), respectively., Conclusion: CT is not a reliable method for determining the presence of ECS in p16-positive HNSCC patients., (© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)