Search

Background: The safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in people with atrial fibrillation and spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage are uncertain. We planned to estimate the effects of starting versus avoiding oral anticoagulation in people with spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation., Methods: In this prospective meta-analysis, we searched bibliographic databases and trial registries using the strategies of a Cochrane systematic review (CD012144) on June 23, 2023. We included clinical trials if they were registered, randomised, and included participants with spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation who were assigned to either start long-term use of any oral anticoagulant agent or avoid oral anticoagulation (ie, placebo, open control, another antithrombotic agent, or another intervention for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events). We assessed eligible trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We sought data for individual participants who had not opted out of data sharing from chief investigators of completed trials, pending completion of ongoing trials in 2028. The primary outcome was any stroke or cardiovascular death. We used individual participant data to construct a Cox regression model of the time to the first occurrence of outcome events during follow-up in the intention-to-treat dataset supplied by each trial, followed by meta-analysis using a fixed-effect inverse-variance model to generate a pooled estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021246133., Findings: We identified four eligible trials; three were restricted to participants with atrial fibrillation and intracranial haemorrhage (SoSTART [NCT03153150], with 203 participants) or intracerebral haemorrhage (APACHE-AF [NCT02565693], with 101 participants, and NASPAF-ICH [NCT02998905], with 30 participants), and one included a subgroup of participants with previous intracranial haemorrhage (ELDERCARE-AF [NCT02801669], with 80 participants). After excluding two participants who opted out of data sharing, we included 412 participants (310 [75%] aged 75 years or older, 249 [60%] with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≤4, and 163 [40%] with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score >4). The intervention was a direct oral anticoagulant in 209 (99%) of 212 participants who were assigned to start oral anticoagulation, and the comparator was antiplatelet monotherapy in 67 (33%) of 200 participants assigned to avoid oral anticoagulation. The primary outcome of any stroke or cardiovascular death occurred in 29 (14%) of 212 participants who started oral anticoagulation versus 43 (22%) of 200 who avoided oral anticoagulation (pooled HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·42-1·10]; I 2 =0%). Oral anticoagulation reduced the risk of ischaemic major adverse cardiovascular events (nine [4%] of 212 vs 38 [19%] of 200; pooled HR 0·27 [95% CI 0·13-0·56]; I 2 =0%). There was no significant increase in haemorrhagic major adverse cardiovascular events (15 [7%] of 212 vs nine [5%] of 200; pooled HR 1·80 [95% CI 0·77-4·21]; I 2 =0%), death from any cause (38 [18%] of 212 vs 29 [15%] of 200; 1·29 [0·78-2·11]; I 2 =50%), or death or dependence after 1 year (78 [53%] of 147 vs 74 [51%] of 145; pooled odds ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·70-1·79]; I 2 =0%)., Interpretation: For people with atrial fibrillation and intracranial haemorrhage, oral anticoagulation had uncertain effects on the risk of any stroke or cardiovascular death (both overall and in subgroups), haemorrhagic major adverse cardiovascular events, and functional outcome. Oral anticoagulation reduced the risk of ischaemic major adverse cardiovascular events, which can inform clinical practice. These findings should encourage recruitment to, and completion of, ongoing trials., Funding: British Heart Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SJC reports institutional funding from Daiichi Sankyo. CC reports funding from the French Ministry of Health, Novartis (advisory board), and Biogen, Bayer and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS; steering committees). HK reports funding from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS; U01NS095869, R01HL144541, R01NS123576, and U01NS106513); funding from BMS-Pfizer Alliance; funding from Roche Diagnostics; being Deputy Editor for JAMA Neurology; participation on clinical trial steering or executive committees for Medtronic, Janssen, and Javelin Medical; participation on endpoint adjudication committees for AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and household ownership interests in TETMedical, Spectrum Plastics Group, and Burke Porter Group. CJMK and FHBMS report institutional funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation Clinical Established Investigator grant (2012T077) for APACHE-AF. DEN reports institutional funding from BMS and provision of a PET tracer from Life Molecular Imaging. APJ reports personal consulting fees and speaker fees from AstraZeneca. RA-SS reports institutional funding from the British Heart Foundation (CS/18/2/33719) for this work, institutional funding from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research and The Stroke Association outside the submitted work, being Data Monitoring Committee chair for ELAN (NCT03148457), and consulting fees paid to the University of Edinburgh from Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Bioxodes, and Population Health Research Institute at McMaster University (Hamilton, ON, Canada). KS reports institutional funding from NIH NINDS (U01NS106513, U24NS129500, R01MD016178, R01EB31114, U24NS107215, R01NR018335, R01NS110721), American Heart Association, Hyperfine, Biogen, and Bard, and consulting fees from Astrocyte, Zoll and Sense (Data Safety and Monitoring Board), and CSL Behring. AS reports institutional funding from Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, NIH, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Servier Canada; consulting fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Servier Canada, AstraZeneca, and Bioxodes; speaker fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Servier Canada, and AstraZeneca; payment for expert testimony from Canadian Medical Protective Agency, support for meetings from Bayer, and Data Monitoring Committee membership for Bayer. HBvdW reports institutional funding from Stryker, Dutch Heart Foundation, and the EU, consulting fees from Bayer and TargED, and membership of the Executive Committee of the European Stroke Organisation. RV reports institutional funding from Bayer, BMS, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer, and Medtronic; consulting fees from AstraZeneca; speaker fees from BMS-Pfizer, Data Monitoring Committee participation for Bayer and Portola; stock options in Bayer and Novartis; materials from Medtronic; and chair of the World Stroke Organisation research committee. CV reports personal support from NIH NINDS (UO1NS106513). PMW reports institutional funding from Stryker, Medtronic, and Penumbra, and Data Monitoring Committee membership for PROTECT-U, TENSION, and MR CLEAN NO IV. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pooled analyses of previous randomised studies have suggested that very early treatment with glyceryl trinitrate (also known as nitroglycerin) improves functional outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage, but this finding was not confirmed in a more recent trial (RIGHT-2). We aimed to assess whether patients with presumed acute stroke benefit from glyceryl tr initrate started within 3 h after symptom onset., Methods: MR ASAP was a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial done at six ambulance services serving 18 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had a probable diagnosis of acute stroke (as assessed by a paramedic), a face-arm-speech-time test score of 2 or 3, systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mm Hg, and could start treatment within 3 h of symptom onset. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by ambulance personnel, using a secure web-based electronic application with random block sizes stratified by ambulance service, to receive either transdermal glyceryl trinitrate 5 mg/day for 24 h plus standard care (glyceryl trinitrate group) or to standard care alone (control group) in the prehospital setting. Informed consent was deferred until after arrival at the hospital. The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included death within 7 days, death within 90 days, and serious adverse events. Analyses were based on modified intention to treat, and treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or common ORs, with adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. We separately analysed the total population and the target population (ie, patients with intracerebral haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, or transient ischaemic attack). The target sample size was 1400 patients. The trial is registered as ISRCTN99503308., Findings: On June 24, 2021, the MR ASAP trial was prematurely terminated on the advice of the data and safety monitoring board, with recruitment stopped because of safety concerns in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. Between April 4, 2018, and Feb 12, 2021, 380 patients were randomly allocated to a study group. 325 provided informed consent or died before consent could be obtained, of whom 170 were assigned to the glyceryl trinitrate group and 155 to the control group. These patients were included in the total population. 201 patients (62%) had ischaemic stroke, 34 (10%) transient ischaemic attack, 56 (17%) intracerebral haemorrhage, and 34 (10%) a stroke-mimicking condition. In the total population (n=325), the median mRS score at 90 days was 2 (IQR 1-4) in both the glyceryl trinitrate and control groups (adjusted common OR 0·97 [95% CI 0·65-1·47]). In the target population (n=291), the 90-day mRS score was 2 (2-4) in the glyceryl trinitrate group and 3 (1-4) in the control group (0·92 [0·59-1·43]). In the total population, there were no differences between the two study groups with respect to death within 90 days (adjusted OR 1·07 [0·53-2·14]) or serious adverse events (unadjusted OR 1·23 [0·76-1·99]). In patients with intracerebral haemorrhage, 12 (34%) of 35 patients allocated to glyceryl trinitrate versus two (10%) of 21 allocated to the control group died within 7 days (adjusted OR 5·91 [0·78-44·81]); death within 90 days occurred in 16 (46%) of 35 in the glyceryl trinitrate group and 11 (55%) of 20 in the control group (adjusted OR 0·87 [0·18-4·17])., Interpretation: We found no sign of benefit of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate started within 3 h of symptom onset in the prehospital setting in patients with presumed acute stroke. The signal of potential early harm of glyceryl trinitrate in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage suggests that glyceryl trinitrate should be avoided in this setting., Funding: The Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium, the Brain Foundation Netherlands, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, and the Dutch Heart Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HR reports financial support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, paid to his institution. BJE reports financial support from Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health (via the Top Consortia for Knowledge and Innovation's public–private partnership), paid to his institution; and unpaid board membership of UEMS Neuroradiology and the Dutch Society of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology. CBLMM, DWJD, PJN and HBvdW report funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation and Stryker, all paid to their institutions or the CONTRAST consortium. CBLMM reports financial support from the TWIN Foundation and Health Evaluation Netherlands, all paid to his institution. CBLMM and HBvdW report financial support from the European Commission, all paid to their institutions. CBLMM and YBWEMR are minor shareholders of Nicolab. DWJD reports grants from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, Brain Foundation Netherlands, ZON MW–The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, and Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, all paid to his institution. HBvdW reports honoraria for consultancy from Bayer and LivaNova, all paid to his institution. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation who survive an anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage, a decision must be made as to whether restarting or permanently avoiding anticoagulation is the best long-term strategy to prevent recurrent stroke and other vascular events. In APACHE-AF, we aimed to estimate the rates of non-fatal stroke or vascular death in such patients when treated with apixaban compared with when anticoagulation was avoided, to inform the design of a larger trial., Methods: APACHE-AF was a prospective, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial with masked endpoint assessment, done at 16 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients who survived intracerebral haemorrhage while treated with anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation were eligible for inclusion 7-90 days after the haemorrhage. Participants also had a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of at least 2 and a score on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 4 or less. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral apixaban (5 mg twice daily or a reduced dose of 2·5 mg twice daily) or to avoid anticoagulation (oral antiplatelet agents could be prescribed at the discretion of the treating physician) by a central computerised randomisation system, stratified by the intention to start or withhold antiplatelet therapy in participants randomised to avoiding anticoagulation, and minimised for age and intracerebral haemorrhage location. The primary outcome was a composite of non-fatal stroke or vascular death, whichever came first, during a minimum follow-up of 6 months, analysed using Cox proportional hazards modelling in the intention-to-treat population. APACHE-AF is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02565693) and the Netherlands Trial Register (NL4395), and the trial is closed to enrolment at all participating sites., Findings: Between Jan 15, 2015, and July 6, 2020, we recruited 101 patients (median age 78 years [IQR 73-83]; 55 [54%] were men and 46 [46%] were women; 100 [99%] were White and one [1%] was Black) a median of 46 days (IQR 21-74) after intracerebral haemorrhage. 50 were assigned to apixaban and 51 to avoid anticoagulation (of whom 26 [51%] started antiplatelet therapy). None were lost to follow-up. Over a median follow-up of 1·9 years (IQR 1·0-3·1; 222 person-years), non-fatal stroke or vascular death occurred in 13 (26%) participants allocated to apixaban (annual event rate 12·6% [95% CI 6·7-21·5]) and in 12 (24%) allocated to avoid anticoagulation (11·9% [95% CI 6·2-20·8]; adjusted hazard ratio 1·05 [95% CI 0·48-2·31]; p=0·90). Serious adverse events that were not outcome events occurred in 29 (58%) of 50 participants assigned to apixaban and 29 (57%) of 51 assigned to avoid anticoagulation., Interpretation: Patients with atrial fibrillation who had an intracerebral haemorrhage while taking anticoagulants have a high subsequent annual risk of non-fatal stroke or vascular death, whether allocated to apixaban or to avoid anticoagulation. Our data underline the need for randomised controlled trials large enough to allow identification of subgroups in whom restarting anticoagulation might be either beneficial or hazardous., Funding: Dutch Heart Foundation (grant 2012T077)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests FHBMS reports two grants from the Dutch Heart Foundation (grant 2012T077 for this study; and grant 2019T060 outside the submitted work). DWD reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra, Stryker, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, and Cerenovus for research outside the current work, all paid to their institution. JS reports grants to their institution outside the submitted work (H2020 programme). JMC reports research funding from Portola, Boehringer, and Bayer, outside the submitted work. HBvdW reports fees for consultancy from Bayer and LivaNova, all paid to their institution; and grants outside the submitted work (EU Horizon 2020 programme; Dutch Heart foundation; and Stryker, of which the last two are through the CONTRAST consortium). CJMK reports grants from the Dutch Heart Foundation (grant 2012T077; this study), and grants outside the submitted work: The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, ZonMw (grant 015008048); support of the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative, which is supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation, CVON2015-01: CONTRAST; and the support of the Brain Foundation Netherlands (HA2015.01.06). All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Due to the time-sensitive effect of endovascular treatment, rapid prehospital identification of large-vessel occlusion in individuals with suspected stroke is essential to optimise outcome. Interhospital transfers are an important cause of delay of endovascular treatment. Prehospital stroke scales have been proposed to select patients with large-vessel occlusion for direct transport to an endovascular-capable intervention centre. We aimed to prospectively validate eight prehospital stroke scales in the field., Methods: We did a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of adults with suspected stroke (aged ≥18 years) who were transported by ambulance to one of eight hospitals in southwest Netherlands. Suspected stroke was defined by a positive Face-Arm-Speech-Time (FAST) test. We included individuals with blood glucose of at least 2·5 mmol/L. People who presented more than 6 h after symptom onset were excluded from the analysis. After structured training, paramedics used a mobile app to assess items from eight prehospital stroke scales: Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE), Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS), Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT), Gaze-Face-Arm-Speech-Time (G-FAST), Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (PASS), Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS), Conveniently-Grasped Field Assessment Stroke Triage (CG-FAST), and the FAST-PLUS (Face-Arm-Speech-Time plus severe arm or leg motor deficit) test. The primary outcome was the clinical diagnosis of ischaemic stroke with a proximal intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (aLVO) on CT angiography. Baseline neuroimaging was centrally assessed by neuroradiologists to validate the true occlusion status. Prehospital stroke scale performance was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and was compared with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores assessed by clinicians at the emergency department. This study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register, NL7387., Findings: Between Aug 13, 2018, and Sept 2, 2019, 1039 people (median age 72 years [IQR 61-81]) with suspected stroke were identified by paramedics, of whom 120 (12%) were diagnosed with aLVO. Of all prehospital stroke scales, the AUC for RACE was highest (0·83, 95% CI 0·79-0·86), followed by the AUC for G-FAST (0·80, 0·76-0·84), CG-FAST (0·80, 0·76-0·84), LAMS (0·79, 0·75-0·83), CPSS (0·79, 0·75-0·83), PASS (0·76, 0·72-0·80), C-STAT (0·75, 0·71-0·80), and FAST-PLUS (0·72, 0·67-0·76). The NIHSS as assessed by a clinician in the emergency department did somewhat better than the prehospital stroke scales with an AUC of 0·86 (95% CI 0·83-0·89)., Interpretation: Prehospital stroke scales detect aLVO with acceptable-to-good accuracy. RACE, G-FAST, and CG-FAST are the best performing prehospital stroke scales out of the eight scales tested and approach the performance of the clinician-assessed NIHSS. Further studies are needed to investigate whether use of these scales in regional transportation strategies can optimise outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke., Funding: BeterKeten Collaboration and Theia Foundation (Zilveren Kruis)., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)