Search

Summary: In several countries, pregnant women are recommended seasonal influenza vaccination and identified as a priority group for vaccination in the event of a pandemic. We review the evidence for the risks of influenza and the risks and benefits of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy. Data on influenza vaccine safety in pregnancy are inadequate, but the few published studies report no serious side-effects in women or their infants, including no indication of harm from vaccination in the first trimester. National policies differ widely, mainly because of the limited data available, particularly on vaccination in the first trimester. The evidence of excess morbidity during seasonal influenza supports vaccinating healthy pregnant women in the second or third trimester and those with comorbidities in any trimester. The evidence of excess mortality in two previous influenza pandemics supports vaccinating in any trimester during a pandemic. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We review studies on the efficacy against disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in adult populations in the more developed countries. Meta-analyses of primary vaccine trials have attempted to reduce uncertainty from lack of power. Vaccine efficacy calculated from studies in South African gold-miners and in Papua New Guinea, with high attack rates and differing serotype patterns, cannot automatically be applied to more developed countries. Meta-analyses will overestimate a protective effect if this clinical heterogeneity is ignored. Meta-analyses limited to trials in the more developed setting show no protective effect against pneumococcal pneumonia and a non-significant protective effect against bacteraemia. Lack of a specific diagnosis limits the ability to detect a protective effect against pneumococcal pneumonia. Most, but not all, observational studies confirm a protective effect against bacteraemia. An effect on mortality in more developed countries has yet to be documented. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Little is known about how long the BCG vaccine protects against tuberculosis. We assessed the long-term vaccine effectiveness (VE) in Norwegian-born individuals.Methods: In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we studied Norwegian-born individuals aged 12-50 years who were tuberculin skin test (TST) negative and eligible for BCG vaccination as part of the last round of Norway's mandatory mass tuberculosis screening and BCG vaccination programme between 1962 and 1975. We excluded individuals who had tuberculosis before or in the year of screening and those with unknown TST and BCG status. We obtained TST and BCG information and linked it to the National Tuberculosis Register, population and housing censuses, and the population register for emigrations and deaths. We followed individuals up to their first tuberculosis episode, emigration, death, or Dec 31, 2011. We used Cox regressions to estimate VE against all tuberculosis and just pulmonary tuberculosis by time since vaccination, adjusted for age, time, county-level tuberculosis rates, and demographic and socioeconomic indicators.Findings: Median follow-up was 41 years (IQR 32-49) for 83 421 BCG-unvaccinated and 44 years (41-46) for 297 905 vaccinated individuals, with 260 tuberculosis episodes. Tuberculosis rates were 3·3 per 100 000 person-years in unvaccinated and 1·3 per 100 000 person-years in vaccinated individuals. The adjusted average VE during 40 year follow-up was 49% (95% CI 26-65), although after 20 years, the VE was not significant (up to 9 years VE [excluding tuberculosis episodes in the first 2 years] 61% [95% CI 24-80]; 10-19 years 58% [27-76]; 20-29 years 38% [-32 to 71]; 30-40 years 42% [-24 to 73]). VE against pulmonary tuberculosis up to 9 years (excluding tuberculosis episodes in the first 2 years) was 67% (95% CI 27-85), 10-19 years was 63% (32-80), 20-29 years was 50% (-19 to 79), and 30-40 years was 40% (-46 to 76).Interpretation: Findings are consistent with long-lasting BCG protection, but waning of VE with time. The vaccine could be more cost effective than has been previously estimatedFunding: Norwegian Institute of Public Health and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]