Search

Summary Invasive fungal diseases are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in a wide range of patients, and early diagnosis and management are a challenge. We therefore did a review of the scientific literature to generate a series of key recommendations for the appropriate use of microbiological, histological, and radiological diagnostic methods for diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases. The recommendations emphasise the role of microscopy in rapid diagnosis and identification of clinically significant isolates to species level, and the need for susceptibility testing of all Aspergillus spp, if treatment is to be given. In this Review, we provide information to improve understanding of the importance of antigen detection for cryptococcal disease and invasive aspergillosis, the use of molecular (PCR) diagnostics for aspergillosis, and the crucial role of antibody detection for chronic and allergic aspergillosis. Furthermore, we consider the importance of histopathology reporting with a panel of special stains, and emphasise the need for urgent (<48 hours) and optimised imaging for patients with suspected invasive fungal infection. All 43 recommendations are auditable and should be used to ensure best diagnostic practice and improved outcomes for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: A systematic review and meta-analysis was done on the use of PCR tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Data from more than 10 000 blood, serum, or plasma samples obtained from 1618 patients at risk for invasive aspergillosis were retrieved from 16 studies. Overall, the mean diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of PCR for proven and probable cases were similar whether two consecutive positive samples were required to define positivity (DOR 15·97 [95% CI 6·83–37·34]) or a single positive PCR test was required (DOR 16·41 [95% CI 6·43–41·88]). Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for two consecutive positive samples were 0·75 (95% CI 0·54–0·88) and 0·87 (95% CI 0·78–0·93), respectively, and if only a single positive sample was required, these values were 0·88 (95% CI 0·75–0·94) and 0·75 (95% CI 0·63–0·84), respectively. Whereas specificity based on a single positive test was significantly lower (p=0·027) than two positive tests, the sensitivity and DOR did not differ significantly. A single PCR-negative result is thus sufficient to exclude a diagnosis of proven or probable invasive aspergillosis. However, two positive tests are required to confirm the diagnosis because the specificity is higher than that attained from a single positive test. Populations at risk varied and there was a lack of homogeneity of the PCR methods used. Efforts are underway to devise a standard for Aspergillus sp PCR for screening, which will help enable formal validation of PCR and estimate its use in patients most likely to benefit. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Outcomes for invasive fungal infections have greatly improved in the past decade, and several new antifungal drugs have been or will be licensed in the next few years. Early accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment have major impact on survival. In a 1995 survey of laboratory practice in the UK for mycology, major disparities were seen, with many laboratories not undertaking even simple diagnostic procedures. Delays in processing and inadequate procedures for handling samples, incomplete or delayed reporting of results, or a combination of these, compromise the care of patients. In randomised trials of antifungal chemotherapy, optimum treatments and good alternatives for others have been defined for some infections. High-quality care requires a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management. In this review, we propose microbiology, histopathology, radiology, and clinical auditing standards, with the evidence base for each reviewed. The standards are absolutes, and, therefore, provide a straightforward basis for improving services to patients if they are all implemented. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]