Search

Objectives: The objective of the paper was to assess real-life experience in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in radiotherapy departments and to evaluate the variability in terms of adherence to American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) recommendations. Materials and methods: In May 2020, an anonymous 30-question online survey, comparing acute phase of outbreak and pre-COVID-19 period, was conducted. Two sections exploited changes in general management of HNC patients and different HNC primary tumors, addressing specific statements from ASTRO ESTRO consensus statement as well. Results: Eighty-eight questionnaires were included in the demographic/clinical workflow analysis, and 64 were analyzed for treatment management. Forty-eight percent of radiotherapy departments became part of oncologic hubs. First consultations reduced, and patients were addressed to other centers in 33.8 and 18.3% of cases, respectively. Telematic consultations were used in 50% of follow-up visits and 73.9% of multidisciplinary tumor board discussions. There were no practical changes in the management of patients affected by different primitive HNCs. Hypofractionation was not favored over conventional schedules. Conclusions: Compared to pre-COVID era, the clinical workflow was highly re-organized, whereas there were no consistent changes in RT indications and schedules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the association of individual parameters and outcome in patients with unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with radiochemotherapy. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 126 patients treated in our Institution between 1998 and 2010 for a locally advanced head and neck cancer. Sixteen individual parameters were evaluated for association with specific outcomes such as overall survival, persistence of disease, disease-specific survival and disease-free survival. Results: Six factors influenced overall survival on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and on univariate Cox regression analysis: smoking, body mass index, site, haemoglobin (Hb) nadir, total dose of radiotherapy and comorbidities. On a multivariate logistic model with stepwise selection, comorbidities, body mass index, total dose and site maintained significance. A significant association for persistence of disease was found with smoking, Hb nadir and site of cancer on univariate and multivariate analysis. Disease-free survival was correlated with performance status, Hb nadir and comorbidities using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and on univariate Cox regression analysis. Only performance status maintained the significance on multivariate analysis. Disease-specific survival was correlated with five parameters: body mass index, site, Hb nadir, therapy interruption and total dose; on multivariate analysis, Hb nadir, therapy interruption and site maintained a statistically significant association. Conclusions: Hb nadir during treatment, body mass index, smoking, stage, comorbidities and performance status are prognostic factors of outcome and response to radical treatment with radiochemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival and toxicity of patients who underwent preoperative therapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Materials and methods: The data of 38 consecutive patients affected by soft tissue sarcoma were retrospectively analysed. Six (15.8 %) patients were treated only with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and 32 (84.2 %) with neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy. Surgery was performed within 4-6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment. Results: Median follow-up was 4.9 years (range 1-13.7 years). All patients received preoperative external beam radiotherapy (RT). Most patients (84.2 %) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment associated with radiotherapy. After neoadjuvant treatment, the majority of patients underwent wide excision (32 out of 38) and five patients had marginal surgery; only one patient underwent amputation. Local recurrence was observed in only two patients (5.2 %). Fourteen (36.8 %) patients experienced metastatic relapse. At the time of our analysis 13 patients (34.2 %) had died due to metastatic spread of the disease. In our series, DFS in relation to distant metastases (DM) showed a significant result for lower limb involvement ( p = 0.038) and marginal excision ( p = 0.024), both predictors of a worse DFS, histology was statistically significant although it was not possible to evaluate the risk for specific histology due to the small number of events in the different subtypes. Conclusions: The results obtained from our study are encouraging with regard to the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative RT in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma in view of the results obtained in terms of local control, limb sparing and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]