Search

The manual kinetic perimetry using Goldmann instrument is still widely used and remains a "gold standard" in examining patients with any kind of advanced visual field loss and impaired co-operability. Nevertheless, Goldmann instrument has several disadvantages, such as examiner dependence, response variability, lack of standardization of parameters, poor repeatability. The latest development in kinetic perimetry, which was realized at the University Eye Hospital in Tuebingen (Germany) is semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP), using Octopus 101 instrument (Interzeag/Haag-Streit, Koeniz-Bern, Switzerland). It is an examiner-independent, standardized and reproducible method. Additionally, obtained results can be corrected for the mean individual reaction time. This paper will briefly present characteristic, advantages and application of SKP in clinical practice.

Purpose: To assess the applicability of a new technique of kinetic visual field examination--semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP)--in patients suffering from the visual field defects due to retinitis pigmentosa., Methods: Thirty-five patients (19 women, 16 men: mean age 38.4 years) suffering from retinitis pigmentosa (10 with with Usher syndrome, one with Bardet-Biedl syndrome and one with Refsum syndrome) were examined using SKP software, implemented in Octopus 101 instrument (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland). Three stimuli (1114e and 14e obligatory) were used to assess the hill of vision of each patient. The area of each isopter was measured in deg2. The test time was measured automatically in minutes., Results: The visual field results were classified as complete or incomplete midperipheral "ring scotoma" (group I--13 patients) and concentric loss of the visual field (group II--22 patients). The area of 1114e isopter was 6147.5 deg2 in the group I and 1961.7 deg2 in the group II. The area of 14e isopter was 1468.4 deg2 and 781.7 deg2, respectively. The mean test time was 10 min. (range 4-20 min.): 8 min. in the group I and 13 min. in the group II., Conclusions: There is a large diversity of patterns of the visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. SKP, in contrary to widely used manual perimeter, gives a possibility of quantification of the visual field area. Future studies may be able to monitor the progression of the visual field loss caused by retinitis pigmentosa.

Purpose: To compare the results of conventional suprathresold automated static perimetry (SASP) and a new method of kinetic visual field examination (semi-automated kinetic perimetry--SKP) in patients with advanced retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) defects, caused by glaucoma., Material and Methods: Nineteen patients (10 women and 9 men) suffering from advanced open-angle glaucoma (17 patients) and low tension glaucoma (2 patients) were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 65.3 years (range 49.0-82.9 years). One eye of each subject was examined with SKP and SASP, both implemented in Octopus 101 perimeter (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) on the same day. The examiner using SKP did not know the SASP results. The static visual field examination was performed first. In order to compare visual fields results obtained with both methods, only central 30 degree area of the visual fields was taken into consideration. The area obtained by creating a virtual isopter (option of SKP software) located between the position of defective and intact visual field regions of SASP and the area of I4e isopter obtained with SKP (stimulus angular velocity 3 degrees/s) were measured in deg2 and compared., Results: The mean area (+/-SD) of I4e isopter obtained with SKP was 1882 deg2 (+/- 510 deg2) and the mean area of SASP 30 degree visual field was 1737 deg2 (+/- 546 deg2). This difference was not statistically significant., Conclusion: Quantitative comparison of static and kinetic perimetry is a difficult task to perform. The SKP software offers a possibility of direct quantitative assessment of the area of each isopters in deg2. This study shows that the results of visual field examinations obtained with both methods in this group do not differ significantly between SASP and SKP.

Purpose: To quantify the area of isopters obtained using a new technique of kinetic visual field examination--semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP)--in case of advanced retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss, caused by glaucoma., Material and Methods: Forty-one subjects (19 men, 22 women; mean age 66.5 +/- 12.5 years) suffering from open-angle glaucoma (30 patients), normal tension glaucoma (5 patients), juvenile glaucoma (2 patients) and PEX glaucoma (4 patients) were examined, using SKP program implemented in Octopus 101 instrument (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland). One eye of each patient was tested using three stimuli according to the Goldmann classification. The stimuli III4e and I4e were obligatory. Additionally one stimulus (I3e or I2e) was used depending on the character of the defect. The stimulus angular velocity was kept constant at the level of 3 degrees/s. Obtained visual field (VF) results were classified according to the Aulhorn classification into stage III (26 VF) and IV (15 VF). The areas of isopters were measured in deg2., Results: The mean area of isopter III4e was 9860 deg2, I4e--5171 deg2, I3e--1093 deg2, I2e--1093 deg2 in the group of Aulhorn stage III. In the group of Aulhorn stage IV the mean area of isopter III4e was 7488 deg2, I4e--3736 deg2, I3e--1109 deg2 and I2e--818 deg2. The mean test time was 16 min. (range 9-25 min.), 15.7 min. in the group of Aulhorn stage III and 16.5 min. in the group of Aulhorn stage IV, respectively., Conclusion: SKP seems to be an effective method for quantitative assessment and evaluation of isopter and scotoma areas (in deg2). In this study it was demonstrated that in case of more advanced stages of glaucomatous visual field loss (Aulhorn stage IV), the areas of isopters appeared to be smaller.