Search

In previous studies, different parameters of arterial stiffness were related to cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients, but their relative prognostic value has not previously been evaluated in 1 cohort. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), the carotid augmentation index, carotid pulse pressure (CPP) and carotid-brachial pulse pressure amplification (AMP) were measured in 98 patients before and after hemodialysis. Patients were followed for a median of 29 months (1–34) and the association of these parameters with cardiovascular mortality were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regressions. During follow-up, 25 patients died of cardiovascular causes. Increasing pre- and postdialysis PWV tertiles and decreasing predialysis AMP tertiles were significantly related to cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.012 and 0.011 for PWV, respectively; < 0.001 for AMP). Neither the carotid augmentation index nor carotid pulse pressure were related to cardiovascular mortality. The adjusted hazard ratios for 1 m/s higher pre- and postdialysis PWV were 1.24 (1.07–1.44) and 1.17 (1.06–1.28), respectively. The hazard ratio for 10% lower predialysis AMP was 1.41 (1.03–1.92). When included in the same model, both predialysis PWV and AMP remained significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality. Among different stiffness parameters, PWV is consistently related to cardiovascular mortality, irrespective of the timing of measurement. Predialysis AMP seems to provide additional prognostic information. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Measuring arterial stiffness (augmentation index (AI), aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV)) in hemodialysis (HD) patients has prognostic significance. To assess its validity, the new oscillometric Arteriograph device (AIA, PWVA) was compared to the validated PulsePen tonometer (AIP, PWVP). Methods: AI and PWV were measured in 98 patients with both devices before HD. Validity was evaluated by Pearson’s correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and by assessing the prognostic value of AI and PWV to predict cardiovascular (CV) mortality over 29 months. Results: Correlation between AIP and AIA was significant (R = 0.527, p < 0.001). The mean difference of AI values obtained by the two devices was –20.6%, and 30% of the paired AI differences fall outside the ±1 SD boundary of the mean between-device difference. There was no significant correlation between the PWVP and PWVA readings (R = 0.173, p = 0.097). The average difference of PWV values by the two devices was –1.2 m/s, and 20.6% of the paired PWV differences fall outside the ±1 SD boundary. In survival analyses, only PWVP but not PWVA was significantly related to CV mortality. Conclusion: Lack of correlation between PWVP and PWVA and lack of prognostic significance of PWVA suggest limited validity of Arteriograph to determine PWV in patients on HD. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]