Search

Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of disability and mortality globally. Information regarding clinical presentation and management of TBI patients in the district hospital settings is inadequate, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Objective This study aims to describe the demographic and clinical profiles of traumatic brain injury patients in a district hospital setting in Nepal. Method This study was done at Chautara Hospital in Sindhupalchowk district from December 2021 to June 2022. Sixty-one patients were included using non-probability sampling. The age and sex of patients, cause of injury, distance from the hospital, the severity of the injury based on the Glasgow Coma Scale, site of trauma on the head, and disposition of patients were analyzed. Result Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria out of which 29 were males and 32 were females. The mean age of the patients was 42.5 years. The most frequent cause was fall from height (23), and the most common injury site was the frontal region of the head (29). Most patients had a mild injury (52) followed by severe (five). Only two patients had moderate injury. Forty-two patients sustained injury within 5 kilometres of the hospital. Thirty patients were referred to higher centres for further treatment. Conclusion Falls from height is the most common cause of traumatic brain injury followed by road traffic accidents. As most of the cases are mild in severity, the availability of trained human resources and telemedicine consultation in district hospitals can substantially decrease referral to higher centres and therefore decrease the burden of traumatic brain injury patients in the higher centres.

Background The basic principles of research methodology are very important for the successful conduct of research. Objective To evaluate the knowledge and perceptions before and after a three-day workshop on health research methodologies conducted at a medical college in Lalitpur, Nepal. Method The pre-post study was conducted during the workshop. There were 31 participants comprising of doctors (interns and residents), medical officers and dental surgeons and faculties. A questionnaire containing two sections related to various themes of the workshop was developed to measure the respondents' knowledge and perception of different concepts. Feedback regarding each session was also obtained. The median knowledge and perception scores before and after the workshop were compared using appropriate statistical tests (p < 0.05). Result More than half of the participants, [18 (58.1%)] were of 20-30 years of age. The total knowledge scores improved significantly after the workshop. The increase in the perception scores after the workshop was also significant. Feedback was positive. The highest feedback score was for the session on critical analysis of a published article. Conclusion Knowledge and perceptions increased significantly indicating such workshops can be effective and contribute to the capacity building of the early-stage researchers.

Background There are numerous retrospective studies and a few prospective studies to determine the neurologic outcome after early versus late surgical treatment for cervical spinal cord injury. Objective To compare the neurological outcome between early (within 72 hours after injury) and delayed (≥ 72 hours after injury) surgery in patients with cervical spinal injury. Method This is a retrospective analysis of the neurological outcome of early versus late surgery following cervical spinal cord trauma. Patients meeting appropriate inclusion criteria were divided into an early or a late surgical treatment group. The neurologic outcomes and other complications were recorded up to six months of follow-up. Result Overall, there was a significant difference in neurological status at presentation and at follow-up (p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the early versus late surgery groups (p-value 0.261) in terms of neurological outcome. Complications were found to be higher among those undergoing posterior surgical approach (OR = 23.75; 95% CI 2.65, 212.98) than those with anterior or combined approach (p=0.005). However, multivariate analysis of these variables failed to show any statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion The timing of surgery does not alter the neurological outcomes and the development of complications significantly. The American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) status at the time of presentation is found to be the single most important factor correlating with the neurological outcome.

The pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created paradoxically a good opportunity globally to conduct research in the field of health and social science, and a Lower Middle-Income Country (LMIC) like Nepal is not an exception in this regard. During this ongoing pandemic, the Ethical Review Board (ERB) of Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) has received numerous research proposals regarding COVID-19. As its main responsibility is to ensure participants' safety, at the same time maintaining the scientific standard of research, the ERB has meticulously gone through all the proposals received so far. During this situation of a health emergency, the ERB of NHRC has had a different experience compared to the usual time. Its strength, weakness, opportunities, and threats have been like never before.