Search

The use of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) consisting of an oral anticoagulant (OAC), aspirin, and a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and / or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a high risk of bleeding. Recently, several randomized clinical trials tested the hypothesis as to whether dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) regimens (consisting of an OAC and a single antiplatelet drug) may be safer in terms of bleeding events as compared with TAT. They also investigated the role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) as a part of DAT and TAT. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of available evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of DAT compared with TAT regimens, international guidelines recommendations, knowledge gaps, and unmet needs in the management of patients with AF and ACS and / or undergoing PCI.

Background: Due to the recent rapid increase in the number of patients implanted with pacemakers, cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices (CRT), conventional monitoring at specialist clinics is becoming increasingly difficult. The development of technology has enabled remote device monitoring with the use of teletransmission systems., Aim: To assess the effectiveness of transmission and the possibility of using telemetric data for further clinical management of patients with heart failure (HF) treated with CRT-D., Methods: The analysis included 305 consecutive patients with chronic HF, New York Heart Association functional classes II-IV, treated with the use of CRT-D by Biotronik or Medtronic in the years 2006-2012. The patients received transmitters, enabling the remote monitoring of the implanted device from the patients' houses. Scheduled reports were automatically sent every month. The triggers for pre-specified emergency alert transmissions were as follows: ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes, CRT-D intervention, ventricular extrasystoles > 110/h, any episode of atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL) or supraventricular tachycardia, mean heart rate (HR) during, mean 24-h HR, CRT pacing < 95%, Elective Replacement Indicator, or End Of Service and device malfunction. The all-cause mortality of the study population has been assessed at the end of the follow-up period (mean of 20.5 months)., Results: Devices manufactured by Biotronik were provided to 71% of the study population, while 29% received devices by Medtronic. In 97.3% of cases, the monitors were wireless, fully automatic, and capable of immediate data transmission whenever a pre-specified alert notification was fulfilled. The analysis of long-term outcomes revealed that all-cause mortality of the whole study population was 13%. The effectiveness of report transmission was 98%. During follow-up a total of 31,198 transmissions were received and analysed, which constituted, on average, 4.9 transmissions per patient per month. Among analyses, 30% were reports generated by scheduled remote follow-ups, and 70% were caused by unscheduled device alerts. Correct functioning of the system was confirmed; the quality of the received data was 100%. In 63.9% of patients, decisions based on the information obtained from telemonitoring reports were made to modify the therapy, refer the patients to cardiology or electrophysiology clinics, or hospitalise them urgently. The most common medical reaction was device reprogramming (46.8%). Pharmacotherapy was modified in 33.7% of patients: beta-blocker dose increase (25.9%), anticoagulant treatment inclusion (15.7%), amiodarone inclusion (1.9%), or digoxin inclusion (4.5%). The remaining medical responses were referring patients for atrioventricular junction ablation (8.1%), VT ablation (2.9%), or AF/AFl ablation (1.6%)., Conclusions: Remote monitoring of implantable devices is feasible, safe, and effective in supervising patients with CRT-D devices. Daily-based remote monitoring of a large population of HF patients allows continuous "triage" of high-risk patients and selection of individuals who require urgent intervention.

Background: The aetiology of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is not well understood. We hypothesised that the pathophysiology of CI-AKI and impaired coronary reperfusion (IR), observed after invasive treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), could be similar and might be related to platelet count (PC) and platelet volume indices (PVI)., Aim: To evaluate the relation between PC, PVI, IR, and CI-AKI in patients with AMI treated invasively., Methods: A single-centre study evaluated 607 consecutive AMI-patients treated invasively. Comparative analyses were performed between patients with CI-AKI and without CI-AKI for the total study population (CI-AKI, n = 156; 25.7% vs. nCI-AKI, n = 451; 74.3%), for patients with diabetes mellitus (CI-AKI-DM, n = 56; 9.2% vs. nCI-AKI-DM, n = 123; 20.3%), and for patients with baseline kidney dysfunction (CI-AKI-BKD, n = 31; 5.1% vs. nCI-AKI-BKD, n = 67; 11.0%). Subjects with IR, who developed CI-AKI, were compared to the remaining patients with respect to platelet parameters (CI-AKI-IR, n = 47; 7.7% vs. controls, n = 560; 92.3%). For total population, as well as studied subgroups, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to reveal independent factors associated with CI-AKI. The results of the models were reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)., Results: PC was higher in CI-AKI-DM-patients (224.8 ± 62.8 × 10(9)/L vs. 197.9 ± 63.3 × 10(9)/L; p = 0.014) and in CI-AKI-BKD-patients (248.9 ± 86.5 × 10(9)/L vs. 202.5 ± 59.3 × 10(9)/L; p = 0.004) than in appropriate controls. Within the studied groups, there were no differences between CI-AKI and nCI-AKI patients with respect to PVI. Comparing CI-AKI-IR-patients with controls, no differences in PC or PVI were found. IR was observed more often in CI-AKI-patients than in nCI-AKI-patients only among diabetics (48.2% vs. 27.6%; p = 0.008). Increase in admission PC was independently associated with CI-AKI in patients with diabetes (per one unit increase OR 1.006; CI 1.0-1.01; p = 0.04) as well as with baseline kidney dysfunction (per one unit increase OR 1.01; CI 1,0-1,02; p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Any similarities in the pathophysiology of CI-AKI and IR were not reflected in platelet parameters. CI-AKI development was not related to PVI; however, higher PC was an independent risk factor for CI-AKI in patients with diabetes or baseline kidney dysfunction.