Search

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe valvular disease associated with high morbidity and mortality., Aims: This preliminary study aimed to evaluate patient profiles and treatment outcomes of IE in Poland and compare them with European IE characteristics., Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter observational cohort study - the POL-ENDO registry - in IE patients from 134 hospitals in Poland recruited between August 2022 and August 2023. We evaluated demographic, clinical, imaging, and treatment outcome data. A comparison of the Polish patients with those assessed in the EURO-ENDO registry between January 2016 and March 2018 was performed., Results: Of a total of 880 IE patients, 622 were male (70.7%). The POL-ENDO participants were older (61.4 [16.7] years vs. 59.25 [18.03] years; P = 0.001). Native-valve IE occurred more often in Poland (82.3% vs. 56.6%; P <0.001). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed more frequently in Poland (93.6% vs. 89.8%; P <0.001). New imaging techniques (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging/positron emission tomography/single-photon emission computed tomography) were less frequently used in Poland (computed tomography: 41.3% vs. 53.2%; P <0.001; magnetic resonance imaging: 6.4% vs. 18.7%; P <0.001). Heart failure occurred more often in Poland as an in-hospital complication (31.4% vs. 14.1%; P <0.001). Surgical treatment was less frequently performed in Poland (36.9% vs. 51.2%; P <0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in Poland (21% vs. 17%; P = 0.008)., Conclusion: Polish IE patients were significantly older and had more comorbidities. New imaging techniques are less frequently used in Poland. Echocardiography was performed more frequently in Poland as the diagnostic mainstay. Surgical treatment was significantly less frequent in Poland. In-hospital mortality in Poland is higher.

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are considered increasingly helpful in diagnosing cardio-neurological conditions, especially if arrhythmic events are of high clinical importance but are unlikely to be captured by standard methods of electrocardiogram recording due to the low frequency of events and short duration of a single event. The compelling evidence from randomized trials and observational studies strongly supports ILR utilization in patients after cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack and in patients with recurrent transient loss of consciousness of unknown origin. These two groups of patients are expected to gain the most from initiating ILR-driven clinically effective management strategies. Stroke or transient ischemic attack survivors with detected subclinical atrial fibrillation can be switched from antiplatelets to anticoagulants, whilst patients with recurrent syncope may avoid severe injuries and/or substantial impairment of their quality of life. This joint opinion of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Polish Cardiac Society and experts from the Polish Neurological Society summarizes the up-to-date rationale for using ILR in everyday clinical practice and describes the road map for implementing this technology in Poland. Special emphasis is placed on the most recent guidelines issued by both cardiological and neurological scientific societies.

Background: It remains a challenge to determine the best time to refer asymptomatic patients for aortic valve replacement (AVR)., Aims: We aimed to determine whether late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) has an independent prognostic significance for adverse postoperative cardiovascular events and changes in left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF)., Methods: Consecutive patients with severe asymptomatic AS were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance with LGE assessment. Patients were followed up every 6 months, and immediately after the onset of symptoms, they were referred for AVR. Early outcomes, as well as LVH and LVEF in the follow-up after AVR, were compared between patients with and without LGE., Results: Ninety-one patients (34 females, 57 males, median [interquartile range] age: 59.2 [56.9-61.6] years) were evaluated, and 68 persons (75%) were treated with AVR. LGE patients (LGE+) developed symptoms earlier than patients without LGE (LGE-, median [interquartile range]: 18 [7-34] months vs. 28 [14-47] months; P = 0.01), but there were no differences in early complications (P = 0.14) and LVEF (P = 0.47) post-AVR between the groups. One year after AVR, no differences were observed between LGE+ and LGE- patients with regard to LV posterior wall thickness (P = 0.26), interventricular septum thickness (P = 0.16), and LVEF (P = 0.9)., Conclusions: The outcome for patients with asymptomatic AS but with LGE was similar to this observed in the non-LGE group. Watchful waiting in this group, with referral to AVR immediately after symptom onset, is associated with comparable results as in LGE- patients.

Background and Aim: To evaluate long-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to significant aortic stenosis (AS) and assess changes in factors affecting survival during a 10-year period in patients referred for surgery from a single centre., Methods: We evaluated 1143 patients (478 women, 665 men; mean age 61 ± 5 years) treated in the Department of Valvular Heart Disease at the Institute of Cardiology in Warsaw who were referred for AVR due to significant AS in 1998-2008 and survived the surgery and the initial 30-day postoperative period. We assessed long-term survival in relation to preoperative parameters including demographic data (age, gender), clinical variables (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class, presence of a significant coronary artery stenosis, arterial hypertension, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]), and operative parameters (prosthetic valve type: biological vs. mechanical, and the type of the surgery: isolated AVR vs. AVR combined with coronary artery bypass grafting)., Results: Ten-year survival was worse in men compared to women (p = 0.001), with the effect of gender gradually decreasing after 3 years of follow-up. Factors affecting long-term survival included age (p = 0.0001) and NYHA class (p = 0.005) in women, and age (p = 0.0001), NYHA class (p = 0.0001), arterial hypertension (p = 0.01), reduced LVEF (p = 0.03), and the presence of significant coronary artery stenoses (p = 0.0001) in men. Evaluation of factors affecting 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival showed their variability mostly in men., Conclusions: Long-term surgical outcomes in patients with significant AS are very good, with better survival in women compared to men, although these differences attenuated after 3 years. Factors affecting 10-year survival are different in women and men: a significant effect in women was noted only for age and preoperative NYHA class, while in men for age, NYHA class, hypertension, reduced LVEF, and the presence of significant coronary artery stenoses. During 10-year follow-up, longitudinal changes can be noted in factors affecting survival after AVR.

Background: The rate of significant conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is 2-8%. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative management approach in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not considered candidates for AVR. The TAVI using the CoreValve (CV) bioprosthesis is associated with a nearly 30% rate of conduction disturbances requiring postprocedural PPI., Aim: To provide an initial evaluation of the rate of conduction disturbances and the need for PPI, and to analyse factors that increase the risk of this complication in patients undergoing TAVI using CV bioprosthesis. In addition, we evaluated the rate of permanent conduction disturbances in patients who underwent PPI at one year after TAVI., Methods: We studies 22 initial patients in a single centre who underwent CV bioprosthesis implantation in 2009-2010. After exclusion of 6 patients with preprocedural PPI, we ultimately evaluated 16 patients. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed using χ(2), Fisher, and Wilcoxon tests, and logistic regression analysis was performed using the SAS software., Results: Overall, 8 (50%) patients in our study group required PPI after TAVI (TAVI + PPI), and the remaining 8 patients did not require PPI (TAVI). The most common indication for PPI was complete heart block. The decision to implant a pacemaker was made on average at 9 ± 7 days following TAVI (range 3 to 22 days). When we analysed risk factors for PPI that were unrelated to the TAVI procedure, we found that the TAVI + PPI group was characterised (vs the TAVI group) by a significantly larger diameter of the native aortic valve (p = 0.03) and a larger left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) dimension in the frontal (p = 0.02) and the corresponding frontal dimension in the transverse view (p = 0.01) by computed tomography angiography. Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of PPI increased more than 2.5 times for each increase in the aortic annulus diameter by 1 mm (OR 2.64; 95% CI 0.90-7.74). None of the risk factors related to TAVI resulted in a significant increase in the rate of PPI. Among the patients who underwent PPI, we only noted a trend for a larger valvulotomy balloon diameter (p = 0.08), shorter procedure duration (p = 0.06), and deeper CV insertion within LVOT (p = 0.09). In addition, the bioprosthesis was inserted deeper in those patients who developed new LBBB after TAVI (p = 0.06). The ECG analysis at one day after the procedure showed a significant prolongation of PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals, and increased left axis deviation in the TAVI + + PPI group. In addition, the TAVI + PPI group showed increased QRS duration (p = 0.03) and increased left axis deviation (p = 0.049) compared to the TAVI group. Each increase in QRS duration by 10 ms was associated with 2.5-fold increase in the risk of PPI (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.97-1.22), and each increase in PR interval duration by 10 ms with a 23% increase in risk (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99-1.05). New LBBB following CV implantation was noted significantly more frequently in the TAVI + PPI group vs the TAVI group (p 〈 0.0003). Pacemaker interrogation at one year after TAVI showed that the mean percentage of ventricular pacing in all patients with a pacemaker (DDD and VVI) pacing was 41%, and it was less than 10% in 2 patients., Conclusions: 1. Transcatheter implantation of a CV bioprosthesis is associated with an increased risk of persistent conduction disturbances and subsequent PPI. 2. New LBBB after TAVI may predict the need for PPI. 3. Careful ECG monitoring is necessary for one week after CV bioprosthesis implantation due to a risk of atrioventricular conduction disturbances and the need for PPI. 4. Patients at an increased risk of postprocedural PPI may be those with deep bioprosthesis insertion in LVOT, larger LVOT diameter, and larger aortic annulus diameter in the frontal view. These observations require confirmation in a larger group of patients.

Background: Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography is currently the only alternative to invasive angiography in the evaluation of coronary anatomy. In patients referred for valvular or thoracic aortic disease surgery, invasive coronary angiography remains the gold standard required by cardiac surgeons during the preoperative evaluation. According to the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines, evaluation of coronary anatomy is recommended in all patients above 40 years of age, with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD), in postmenopausal women, patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with suspected ischaemic aetiology of mitral regurgitation, and in patients with one or more risk factors for CAD. The possibility to perform coronary CT angiography to exclude CAD before planned non-coronary cardiac surgery was first allowed in the 2010 Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus., Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of dual-source CT for the evaluation of coronary anatomy in patients before planned cardiac valvular surgery., Methods: We studied 98 consecutive patients with a haemodynamically significant valvular heart disease and guideline-based indications for coronary angiography to exclude CAD before planned valvular surgery. Exclusion criteria included cardiac arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, frequent ventricular and supraventricular premature beats), estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), allergy to iodine contrast agents, and lack of patient consent. Mean patient age was 58.8 (range 30-78) years. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was first determined in all patients. Coronary CT angiography was not performed if CACS was > 1000. In the remaining patients, complete CT evaluation was performed with the administration of a contrast agent. Conventional invasive coronary angiography was subsequently performed in patients with at least one > 50% stenosis, artifacts due to calcifications, or motion artifacts., Results: In 79 (80.6%) patients, CT angiography excluded the presence of a significant coronary artery stenosis without the need for invasive angiography. Conventional coronary angiography was required in 19 (19.4%) patients, including 13 (13.3%) patients with a > 50% stenosis in CT angiography, 2 (2%) patients with calcification artifacts, 1 (1%) patient with motion artifacts, 2 (2%) patients with CACS > 1000 in whom CT angiography was nor performed, and 1 (1%) patient with allergic symptoms during administration of a test dose of the contrast agent. Ultimately, significant CAD was diagnosed in 9 (9.2%) patients in whom coronary artery bypass surgery was also performed. In addition, vascular anomalies were diagnosed with cardiac CT angiography in 5 (5.1%) patients. In 14 patients, CT angiography was also used for previously planned evaluation of a coexisting aortic aneurysm., Conclusions: Coronary CT angiography may be useful to exclude significant CAD in patients referred for valvular disease surgery.

Background: Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has recently emerged as an alternative to conventional surgery in high-risk surgical patients with haemodynamically significant aortic valve stenosis. However, patients referred for TAVI are usually elderly individuals (> 80 years) who frequently also suffer from renal impairment. Trans-catheter valve therapies require extensive use of contrast injections with a risk of nephrotoxicity., Aim: To evaluate post-TAVI renal function and to determine whether the exposure to contrast injections might cause reduced kidney function and contrast-induced nephropathy., Methods: From January 2009 to September 2010, TAVI was performed in 39 patients (26 women and 13 men). The mean age of the patients was 81.43 ± 7.39 years, and the mean volume of contrast material administered was 187.95 ± 91.34 mL. Serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR, acc. to the MDRD formula) were estimated in all patients prior to and 1, 2, and 5-8 days after TAVI., Results: Two female patients died on postoperative day 1. Other patients did not show clinically significant reduction in renal function following the procedure (mean creatinine concentration 104.46 vs 99.77 vs 94.56 vs 93.64 mmol/L, NS and mean GFR 52.37 vs 56.63 vs 60.18 vs 61.34 mL/min/1.73 m², NS)., Conclusions: 1. The TAVI procedure, which includes contrast injection does not seem to cause a clinically significant decrease of renal function. 2. None of our elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, multiple co-morbidities, and pre- TAVI renal compromise developed contrast-induced nephropathy.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a new method for the treatment of aortic stenosis (AS)., Aim: To evaluate early results of TAVI using transfemoral/transsubclavian approach (TFA/TSA) or transapical approach (TAA) in patients with severe AS and high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement., Methods: Between January 2009 and May 2010, 30 high-risk patients underwent TAVI. The primary treatment option was TFA, and TAA was used if contraindications to TFA were present; one patient underwent the procedure using TSA. Reasons for selecting TAA were as follows: small diameter (<7 mm) and/or severe calcification of the iliofemoral arteries, peripheral atherosclerosis, "porcelain" aorta and a horizontal course of the ascending aorta. Edwards-Sapien or CoreValve devices were used in all cases, and procedures were performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass in a cardiac catheterisation laboratory., Results: Mean patient age was 82.46 ± 5.79 years, mean NYHA class was 3.23 ± 0.41, and predicted mean surgical mortality using logistic Euroscore was 29.18 ± 16.9% (22.72 ± 12.07% in the TFA/TSA group vs 34.6 ± 15.4% in the TAA group; p = 0.031). Eleven patients were treated using TAA. The valve was implanted successfully in 96% of patients. Inhospital mortality was 3.3%. Mean 30-day mortality was 6.6% in the entire cohort, 0% in the TFA/TSA group and 18% in the TAA group. There were no cases of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, or need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. One patient died suddenly three weeks after the procedure; except for this case, there were no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE: MI, cerebrovascular accident, re-do procedure) at 30-day follow-up. The TAVI was associated with a significant reduction in the mean maximal aortic gradient in both groups (from 99.6 ± 22.07 mm Hg to 21.83 ± 9.38 mm Hg post-procedure and to 23.25 ± 9.22 mm Hg at 30-day follow up), with no cases of severe aortic valve regurgitation. The NYHA class at 30 days improved from 3.23 ± 0.41 to 1.72 ± 0.52 (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate lower 30-day complication rate and mortality in the TFA/TSA group. The availability of several techniques of valve implantation in the group of non-surgical patients with severe AS potentially broadens the patient population with indications for this treatment.

We present a case of a 61 year-old woman with tachycardia originating close to the His bundle where radiofrequency (RF) ablation may bear potential risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. In this case report we discuss the possibility of a AV nodal reciprocating tachycardia with tendon of Todaro breakthrough. Patient was safely and effectively treated with RF catheter ablation.

Introduction: Despite progress in medicine, the prevalence of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with prosthetic valves (PVE) has not decreased. Positive blood and valve cultures are one of the most important diagnostic criteria of IE. There are no unambiguous data regarding the influence of pathogenic factors on prognosis., Aim: To analyse blood and valve cultures in patients with PVE and assess their impact on the risk of early and late deaths as well as IE relapse., Methods: The study group consisted of 71 PVE patients. Infective endocarditis was diagnosed based on the Polish Cardiac Society guidelines. Early and late mortality as well as IE relapse were analysed in patients hospitalised between 1988 and 1998., Results: Positive blood cultures were found in 55 (77.5%) patients. Early mortality was 15.5% (11 deaths). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus infection was an independent risk factor of early death (p=0.02). During long-term follow-up 8 (13.3%) patients died. The risk of late death increased with positive valve culture (p=0.04). Recurrence of IE was diagnosed in 6 (10%) patients. Staphylococcus epidermidis was a risk factor of disease relapse (p=0.03). Six-year survival was 73%., Conclusions: 1. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aetiology increases the risk of early death in patients with PVE. 2. Pathogenic factors did not influence the risk of late death. 3. The risk of late death was increased with positive valve culture with negative blood cultures. 4. Staphylococcus epidermidis aetiology increases the risk of PVE relapse.

Introduction: Despite improvement in medical care the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) has not decreased. Positive blood cultures are one of the most important diagnostic criteria of IE. There are no uniform data regarding the influence of pathogenetic factors on prognosis., Aim: To analyse the results of blood and valve cultures in patients with IE of native valves and evaluate their influence on the risk of early and late deaths as well as recurrence of IE., Methods: The study group consisted of 152 patients with IE of native valves. The IE diagnosis was based on the Duke criteria. Early and late mortality as well as recurrence of IE were analysed in patients hospitalised at the Institute of Cardiology in Warsaw from 1988 to 1998., Results: Positive blood cultures were found in 103 (67.8%) of patients. In-hospital mortality was 5.9% (9 deaths). The incidence of early deaths was significantly lower in surgically treated patients (p=0.01). Late deaths occurred in 23 (16%) patients. Results of blood and valve tissue cultures were not related to mortality. Recurrent IE was observed in 7 (4.9%) patients. Staphylococcus aureus was an independent risk factor for recurrent IE (p=0.04). Six-year survival was 79%., Conclusions: In patients with native valve infective endocarditis: 1. The risk of early and late death is not related to the results of blood and valve cultures. 2. Staphylococcus aureus aetiology increases the risk of disease recurrence. 3. The risk of early death is significantly lower in patients treated with surgery.