Search

Objective. The objective of the study was to investigate the results of operative endoscopic treatment of patients with urological profile depending on the duration of hospitalization.. Patients and methods. The study examined the treatment results of 1647 urological patients aged from 41 to 69 years (mean age 57.1 years), including 791 (48.03 %) males and 856 (51.97 %) females. A comparative analysis of the results of operative endoscopic treatment of patients in two groups was conducted. The interventions were comparable in volume. The first group consisted of patients who were observed in a hospital setting for 3‑4 days; the second group consisted of patients who were discharged home within the first day. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain. Quality of life was determined using the SF-36 questionnaire. Results. The average pain score on the VAS scale in the first day after surgery in both patient groups was 5.45±0.3 and 5.16±0.2 points, respectively, which was considered «tolerable» pain. The quality of life of patients in the two groups during the first day of the postoperative period indicated comparability of data on the PR, PF, BP, and GH scales. Better parameters were recorded in the second group of patients, compared to the first, on the SF, RE, and MH scales. Analysis of the quality of life questionnaire three days after surgery showed improvement in all scales; better results were achieved in the second group of patients, compared to the first, on the VT, SF, RE, and MH scales, which characterized better social functioning and higher vitality. Conclusion. Endoscopic interventions in urology allow for better pain tolerance, especially in the first day after surgery, which has a positive impact on the quality of life of patients. Shortening the length of hospital stay to one day without increasing the pain syndrome increases the socio-economic significance of endoscopic techniques and emphasizes the prospects for further research.