Search

Background: Worldwide, carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral neuropathy due to compression. A minimally invasive endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) procedure is available to treat this condition. This study aims to identify and compare the different types of anesthesia in ECTR, particularly in terms of functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and operative time. Methods: PRISMA guideline was used to design and conduct this systematic review. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were searched systematically from inception to May 2022. For the search, MeSH terms such as ECTR, general anesthesia, local anesthesia (LA), and regional anesthesia were used. Results: As a result of reviewing the literature, 198 publications were reviewed. After implanting our criteria, 12 studies were included. We included 14589 patients who underwent ECTR. LA has a higher satisfaction rate and a shorter operative time than general anesthesia. LA had a mean operative time of 20.1 min, compared to 45 min and 51 min for regional anesthesia and general anesthesia. The number of patients with postoperative ECTR surgical complications was 2.7% (95%CI). After ECTR with LA, 95% of patients are back to their daily routine within six months. Conclusion: All the reported methods were effective, with LA being the most commonly used. Furthermore, it showed a shorter operative time and a higher satisfaction rate than other types of anesthesia. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, we recommend future randomized controlled trials to highlight the differences in anesthesia types used in ETCR. Level of evidence: III, risk/prognostic study

Background: Hand basal cell carcinoma is a rare and complex disorder. Due to the hand's anatomical features, managing hand BCC is challenging. Therefore, we have conducted this systematic review to investigate various clinical characteristics, investigations, and treatment options related to hand BCC. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was used to provide pooled recurrence rates. Methods: We conducted this review per the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) guidelines. This study performed a systematic literature review in February 2022 using the following electronic databases: Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Key terms include hand basal cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, management, outcome, and recurrence. We evaluated articles according to predefined quality criteria. Results: The study included 9725 patients and 51 published articles. A total of 35 case reports, 2 case series, 1 prospective study, and the remaining retrospective studies were evaluated. An asymptomatic skin lesion was the main complaint. In 10 studies, Moh surgery was the most frequently used treatment method. In the seven studies included in the meta-analysis, the overall incidence rate of recurrence among the included patients was 1.49 cases per year. Conclusion: The optimal extent of surgical treatment is still controversial, though an early biopsy can help identify lesions at an early stage. It is the first study to provide occurrence rates based on a meta-analysis. Developing treatment guidelines for BCC of the hand will be the focus of future research.