Search

• We developed a assay that can simultaneously detect these 3 viruses. • This method is more sensitively than conventional multiplex PCR. • The assay was specific for FAdVs, CAV and IBDV. Fowl adenovirus (FAdV) infections in chickens have resulted in global economic losses in the poultry industry. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and chicken anemia virus (CAV) infections lead to immunosuppression in chickens, and concomitant co- infection with FAdV usually produces severe and lethal infections. These co-infections are common occurrences on chicken farms and affect large number of chickens. Thus, a rapid, sensitive and specific diagnostic test for these viruses becomes a prerequisite to effective control and isolation measures. We developed a triplex nanoparticle-assisted PCR (nano-PCR) assay that can simultaneously detect these 3 viruses in a single assay tube using PCR primers directed at respective specific genes of each virus. The assay was specific for FAdVs, CAV and IBDV, and it did not amplify Newcastle disease virus, infectious bronchitis virus, egg drop syndrome virus or Marek's disease virus. The minimum detection limit was 27.2 femtogram (fg) for all three viruses and was 1000-fold more sensitive than multiplex PCR using identical primers. Screening of 69 clinical samples from 40 to 50 days old chickens with obvious lesions in liver using the nano-PCR compared with a multiplex PCR yielded identical results. Of the 69 samples, 13 were detected positive including 4 for FAdV, 4 for IBDV and 6 for CAV single virus infections, respectively, as well as 5 for FAdV/CAV, 2 for FAdV/IBDV and 3 for IBDV/CAV co-infections. The triple nano-PCR assay developed in our laboratory is a sensitive, specific and simple method that can be used for detection of FAdV, CAV and IBDV as single or mixed infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The present study describes the development of a SYBR Green based real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) for detection and quantitation of all fowl adenovirus (FAdV) species. Primers were designed based on conserved nucleotide sequences within the 52K gene. Ten-fold serial dilutions of a vector DNA were used as standard for quantitation. The real-time PCR had an efficiency of 98%, a regression squared value of 0.999 and showed a range of 6.73–6.73×108 copies of FAdV DNA per reaction. The assay was highly specific for FAdVs and an exact quantitation of all 5 FAdV species (FAdV-A to FAdV-E) could be demonstrated. It was shown, that twelve FAdV serotypes (FAdV-1 to 8a, and 8b to 11) were detectable and quantifiable. Other viral genomes as well as uninfected chicken embryo liver (CEL) cells did not produce positive signal. Cloacal swabs were taken during the animal experiment, which was performed with all FAdV species. Shedding of FAdVs was investigated in cell culture, by conventional PCR and by the developed real-time PCR. The real-time PCR was found more sensitive than cell culture and conventional PCR. Detection and quantitation of FAdVs in different type of samples was possible by the new real-time PCR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: A total of 44 fowl adenovirus (FAdV) samples from 6 European countries, Pakistan, India, Kuwait, Mexico, Peru and Ecuador were used in this study and the phylogenetic analyses based on the loop 1 (L1) region of hexon gene were performed. For comparison, available hexon sequences of representatives of different FAdV species were also used. At least 12 genotypes within the five FAdV species (A–E) were revealed and the existence of these genotypes was supported by high bootstrap values. Furthermore, three primer pairs binding to the conserved pedestal regions (HexL1s/HexL1as and HexA/HexB) and pedestal (P1) region and loop 2 (L2) region (HexF1/HexR1) of the FAdV hexon gene were used for high-resolution melting (HRM)-curve analysis and results were compared with those of phylogenetic analyses. HRM-curve analysis based on the HexL1s/HexL1as region grouped all tested field isolates and reference strains into 22 subgroups, consistently with phylogenetic analysis. This method is a rapid and cost-effective alternative to existing serotype identification methods and offers a possibility to classify FAdV isolates more precisely. However, it has limitations such as need for extensive interpretation of results and potential for indeterminate results. Gaining of hexon sequences of further field isolates offers the potential for novel and additional information in analysis of the molecular epidemiology of FAdV. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]