Search

Two lateral flow devices (LFD) for the detection of vesicular stomatitis (VS) virus (VSV), types Indiana (VSV-IND) and New Jersey (VSV-NJ) were developed using monoclonal antibodies C1 and F25VSVNJ-45 to the respective VSV serotypes. The performance of the LFDs was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia and cell culture passage derived supernatants of VSV. The collection of test samples included 105 positive for VSV-IND (92 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 13 cell culture antigens; encompassing 93 samples of subtype 1 [VSV-IND-1], 9 of subtype 2 [VSV-IND-2] and 3 of subtype 3 [VSV-IND-3]) and 189 positive for VSV-NJ (162 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 27 cell culture antigens) from suspected cases of vesicular disease in cattle and horses collected from 11 countries between 1937 and 2008 or else were derived from experimental infection and 777 samples that were either shown to be positive or negative for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus (FMDV) and swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) or else collected from healthy cattle or pigs and collected from 68 countries between 1965 and 2011. The diagnostic sensitivity of the VSV-IND (for reaction with VSV-IND-1) and VSV-NJ LFDs was either similar or identical at 94.6% (VSV-IND) and 97.4% (VSV-NJ) compared to 92.5% and 97.4% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA. The VSV-IND LFD failed to react with viruses of VSV-IND-2 and 3, while the VSV-NJ device recognized all VSV-NJ virus strains. The diagnostic specificities of the VSV-IND and VSV-NJ LFDs were 99.1% and 100, respectively, compared to 99.6% and 99.8% for the ELISA. Reactions with FMDV which can produce indistinguishable syndromes clinically in cattle, pigs and sheep and SVDV (vesicular disease in pigs) did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFDs to be used next to the animal for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of vesicular disease and for the subtype (VSV-IND-1) and type-specific (VSV-NJ) pen-side diagnosis of VS and differential diagnosis from FMD.

This study describes a novel blocking microsphere-based immunoassay for highly sensitive and specific detection of antibodies against bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV). The intra- and inter-assay variability are 4.9% and less than 7%, respectively, and variability of bead conjugations is less than 6.6%. The diagnostic performance of the assay was evaluated by testing a total of 509 serum samples. Based on a negative/positive cut-off value of 30.3%, the assay has a sensitivity of 99.4% and a specificity of 98.3% relative to ELISA. The new microsphere immunoassay provides an alternative to conventional ELISA systems and can be used for high-throughput screening in the BVD control programmes.

A lateral flow device (LFD) for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) of the SAT 2 serotype was developed using a monoclonal antibody (Mab 2H6). The performance of the LFD was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia: 305 positive for FMDV type SAT 2 from suspected cases of vesicular disease collected from 30 countries and 1002 samples shown to be negative for FMDV type SAT 2 collected from 67 countries between 1968 and 2008. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFD for FMDV type SAT 2 was higher at 88% compared to 79% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA, and the diagnostic specificity of the LFD was approximately 99% compared to 100% for the ELISA. The device recognized FMDV strains of wide diversity within the FMDV SAT 2 serotype and gave a superior performance for their detection compared to the 1F10 LFD which had been developed previously and shown to perform less well for the detection of FMDVs of this particular serotype. Reactions in the SAT 2 2H6 LFD with the viruses of other FMDV serotypes and swine vesicular disease (which produces a clinically indistinguishable syndrome in pigs), did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFD to be employed to complement the 1F10 device next to the animal in the pen-side diagnosis of FMD, for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of the disease and for specific confirmation of a FMDV type SAT 2 infection.

A lateral flow device (LFD) for the detection of swine vesicular disease (SVD) virus (SVDV) and differential diagnosis from foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) was developed using a monoclonal antibody (Mab C70). The performance of the LFD was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia and cell culture passage derived supernatants of SVDV and porcine teschovirus (enterovirus; PEV). The collection of test samples included 157 which were positive for SVDV (84 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 73 cell culture antigens) from suspected cases of vesicular disease in pigs collected from 14 countries between 1966 and 2008 and 663 samples which were either shown to be negative for SVDV and FMD virus (FMDV) or else collected from healthy pigs or demonstrated to be positive for FMDV, PEV or vesicular exanthema (VEV) and collected from 16 countries between 1965 and 2008 or else were derived from experimental animals. Three further samples containing vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) were also tested. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFD for SVDV was similar at 82% compared to 86% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA, and the diagnostic specificity was 100% compared to 99.7% for the ELISA. The device recognized virus strains of each of the known genotypes of the sole SVDV serotype. Reactions with FMDV, VEV, VSV and PEV which can produce clinically indistinguishable syndromes in pigs, did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFD to be used next to the animal for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of vesicular disease in pigs and for the specific pen-side diagnosis of SVD and differential diagnosis from FMD.

A lateral flow device (LFD) for the detection of all seven serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) was developed using a monoclonal antibody (Mab 1F10) shown to be pan-reactive to FMDV strains of each serotype by ELISA. The performance of the LFD was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia (304 positive and 1003 negative samples) from suspected cases of vesicular disease collected from 86 countries between 1965 and 2008 and negative samples collected from healthy animals. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFD for FMDV was similar at 84% compared to 85% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA, and the diagnostic specificity of the LFD was approximately 99% compared to 99.9% for the ELISA. The device recognized FMDV strains of wide diversity of all seven serotypes but weaker reactions were often evident with those of type SAT 2, several viruses of which were not detected. Reactions with the viruses of swine vesicular disease and vesicular stomatitis that produce clinically indistinguishable syndromes in pigs and cattle, did not occur. The test procedure was simple and rapid, and typically provided a result within 1-10min of sample addition. Simple homogenizers that could be used in field conditions for preparing epithelial suspensions were demonstrated to be effective for LFD application. These data illustrate the potential for the LFD to be used next to the animal in the pen-side diagnosis of FMD and for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of the disease.

Six antigen preparations of bovine leukemia virus, including affinity-purified glycoprotein gp51, gradient-purified fetal lamb kidney-bovine leukemia virus antigen, and four crude antigens, were used in combination with several groups of cattle sera, for the evaluation of electrophoretic immunoblotting as a serological test method. Sera (89) from cattle naturally-infected with bovine leukosis virus, a panel of reference sera from infected and uninfected cattle (18), and serial bleedings from experimentally-infected cows (4) were used. Major differences between the six antigen preparations were observed in their reactivity with the various sera. The immunological variabilities of these antigens were confirmed further by their reactions with a gp51-specific monoclonal antibody. The known immunodominant gp51 failed as a reliable indicator for the serological status of the sera in blots when compared to the results on the same sera, two gp51-specific ELISAs and the agar gel immunodiffusion test were used as reference tests. There was a lack of staining of gp51 antigen by many sera, probably due to the labile nature of the gp51 molecule. On the other hand, non-specific staining in the gp51 region appeared with high frequency in some antigens. Antibody staining of the internal viral protein p24 correlated well with the results of the three reference tests. Other bands stained infrequently and were of no diagnostic value.