Search

The cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) animal model is used in several laboratories worldwide to investigate immunogenicity, carcinogenicity and life cycle aspects of papillomaviruses. It is the only animal model in which the full life cycle of the virus from initiation of infection to malignant progression can be studied. A major strength of the model is that the viral DNA is infectious. This feature allows for the study of mutant genomes without the need to create infectious mutant virus. Results from laboratory to laboratory have not always been consistent. Different laboratories use different methods for creating infections from DNA and it was postulated that the different challenge methods could play a role in the differential outcomes. Because different laboratories use different strains of CRPV, it was also desirable to test if the difference in CRPV genomes contributed to the differential outcomes. In this study, three of the CRPV strains used most widely (Washington B, Orth CRPV and Hershey CRPV) were cloned into PUC19; the E8 ATG ko mutants for each strain were also generated. We employed the infection technique reported previously in which scarification is done first and is followed with delivery of DNA by pipette 3 days later. The papilloma outgrowth generated by these three wild type constructs and their E8 ATG ko mutants was compared. No significant difference was found among the three strains or their E8 ATG ko mutants. E8 ATG ko mutants induced significantly smaller but persistent papillomas when compared to their respective wild type CRPVs. The gene gun was also used to create infections with both Hershey CRPV DNA and the corresponding E8 ATG ko and was found to lead to less vigorous growth as well as some regressions. Further studies suggested that gene gun delivery might have induced an immune response which then resulted in compromised growth of papillomas. It was concluded that the E8 gene is not required for infection. We suggest that standardized infection methods should be used in laboratories so that inconsistencies in conclusions will be minimized., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV)/rabbit model has proved useful for the investigation of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines and for the study of the pathogenesis of papillomavirus infection. It is currently the only animal model in which the entire viral program can be recapitulated, including progression to cancer. CRPV DNA is infectious in domestic rabbits and therefore mutants can be studied without the need to generate corresponding viruses. Although the CRPV animal model is used widely in various laboratories, no optimized or standardized method is used for creating CRPV viral and especially DNA infections. These different methods have made it difficult for investigators to compare results from laboratory to laboratory. A simple and highly efficient method is reported here; it has been refined based on previous methodology for the production of CRPV infections from both virus and plasmid DNA. This method can be adapted easily by other investigators in the field. The resulting standardization will aid in the evaluation of data from different laboratories.

Plasmids containing cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) DNA can induce papillomas in vivo, but efficiency has been low. The aim of the present investigation was to explore some of the technical variables involved in inoculation of rabbits with recombinant CRPV DNA in attempts to improve both yield and consistency of papilloma induction. It was found that induction of epidermal hyperplasia, with either a mixture of turpentine and acetone or phorbol esters, produced a marked increase in papilloma yield. An additional powerful factor was the use of very vigorous, cutaneous scarification, sufficient to penetrate the papillary dermis and produce bleeding. When used in combination, papilloma yields were consistent and often reached 90-100% of inoculated sites. A number of other variables which did not consistently affect papilloma yield were tested. These included bleb and puncture injections, plasmid dose, vector type, occlusive dressings, lipofection reagent, carrier DNA, and different methods for plasmid DNA extraction and purification. It is concluded that the most important variables in improving papilloma yields were prior induction of epidermal hyperplasia and vigorous cutaneous scarification.