Search

Aim: To comprehensively evaluate the dynamic change of vestibular function during long-term follow-up of vestibular neuritis, as well as the co-relationship with the outcomes of vestibular neuritis (VN), which provides the recommendations for vestibular function tests during the course of VN., Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 16 patients with acute VN. Caloric test, vHIT, rotatory chair tests, VEMP, dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) score, and dynamic dizzy scales (VAS-DD) was first performed within 7 days of neuritis onset, which were further re-evaluated during the 6-12 months of follow-up. The dynamic changes on multiple objective vestibular examinations were analyzed during the acute and recovery stage of VN. We further evaluated the co-relationship between the vestibular dysfunction scales and the prognosis of VN., Results: In more than 6 months of follow-up, 44% of the ultralow frequency, 94% of the low-to-mid frequency, and 44% of the high-frequency function of the horizontal semicircular canal returned to normal (p < 0.05). The change degree in symmetry of the rotatory chair test was correlated with the gain of the horizontal semicircular canal on the vHIT and the unilateral weakness (UW) value on the caloric test (p < 0.05). The change in DHI score was correlated with the phase; change in VAS-DD level correlated with the symmetry and TC of the rotatory chair test at VN recovery stage (p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the change in DHI score or change in VAS-DD and the degree of vestibular function recovery (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: In general, vestibular function improved during the course of VN. The rotatory chair test can be used to evaluate the overall function of the vestibular system and the compensatory state in patients with VN.

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common multi-system neurodegenerative disorder with possible vestibular system dysfunction, but prior vestibular function test findings are equivocal., Objective: To report and compare vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain as measured by the video head impulse test (vHIT) in participants with PD, including tremor dominant and postural instability/gait dysfunction phenotypes, with healthy controls (HC)., Methods: Forty participants with PD and 40 age- and gender-matched HC had their vestibular function assessed. Lateral and vertical semicircular canal VOR gains were measured with vHIT. VOR canal gains between PD participants and HC were compared with independent samples t-tests. Two distinct PD phenotypes were compared to HC using Tukey's ANOVA. The relationship of VOR gain with PD duration, phenotype, severity and age were investigated using logistic regression., Results: There were no significant differences between groups in vHIT VOR gain for lateral or vertical canals. There was no evidence of an effect of PD severity, phenotype or age on VOR gains in the PD group., Conclusion: The impulsive angular VOR pathways are not significantly affected by the pathophysiological changes associated with mild to moderate PD.

Objective: Main objectives for this study were to develop a quantification method to obtain a Perez-Rey (PR) score adapted to the VVOR test and to evaluate the correlation of the PR score obtained with quantified VVOR with the PR score of the vHIT test., Methods: A new PR score calculation method for quantified VVOR test was developed using the MATLAB computational software based on saccadic response time latency variability between each head oscillation cycle of the VVOR test. Retrospective correlation between PR scores in VVOR and vHIT tests, performed in the same vHIT testing session for patients with vestibular neuritis and vestibular neurectomy, was performed to correlate new PR (VVOR) score with the classic PR (vHIT) score., Results: Thirty patients were included: 11 post-neurectomy and 19 subacute vestibular neuritis. Pearson's correlation coefficient (R2) for the overall sample was 0.92 (p < 0.001) and 95% confidence interval was 0.85 -0.96. In the linear mixed-effects statistical model developed, only PRVHIT and PRVVOR scores showed statistical association in Wald X2 test (p = 0.008)., Conclusion: The new developed PR score for synchronization measurement of saccadic responses in VVOR testing is a valid method that outputs synchronization values and highly correlates with PR score in vHIT test.

Background: Unapparent saccades in video head impulse test (vHIT) are usually present in Meniere's disease (MD) patients but tend to be ignored by the clinician. The result of vHIT is constantly questioned in MD patients due to a lack of uniform metrics. A more effective indicator is needed for indicating MD's pathological progress., Objectives: To get a comprehensive understanding of the nature and usability of saccades in different MD stages., Methods: 118 patients diagnosed with unilateral MD were recruited in this study. Patient history, audiological examination, caloric test, vHIT were performed. We proposed 'raw saccades' to represent all showed wave peaks behind the head peak and named saccades by their appearance sequence: 1st saccade, 2nd saccade and 3rd saccade. An exploratory saccade analysis was executed to investigate the effectiveness of saccade attributes in identifying MD stages., Results: MD patients have greater detectable 1st saccade than PR score as well as 2nd saccade. The time and velocity of the 1st saccade show high interaural variability (p = 0.028, p = 0.000 respectively). No statistical difference concerning the vHIT gain, PR score and 2nd saccade among stages could be recognized on both affected and contralateral sides. Multiple comparisons show the affected 1st saccade velocity and affected 1st saccade absolute velocity have stage-difference. At late stages (3&4), the affected 1st saccade is manifested as a speed increase, and this measure shows a relatively high correlation with MD stages compared to other vestibular indicators., Conclusion: The 1st saccade velocity on the affected side could indicate the MD disease process and severity.

Background: Clinical vestibular technology is rapidly evolving to improve objective assessments of vestibular function. Understanding the reliability and expected score ranges of emerging clinical vestibular tools is important to gauge how these tools should be used as clinical endpoints., Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of four vestibular tools and to determine expected ranges of scores through smallest real difference (SRD) measures., Methods: Sixty healthy graduate students completed two 1-hour sessions, at most a week apart, consisting of two video head-impulse tests (vHIT), computerized dynamic visual acuity (cDVA) tests, and a smartphone-assisted bucket test (SA-SVV). Thirty students were tested by different testers at each session (inter-rater) and 30 by the same tester (test-retest). ICCs and SRDs were calculated for both conditions., Results: Most measures fell within the moderate ICC range (0.50-0.75). ICCs were higher for cDVA in the inter-rater subgroup and higher for vHITs in the test-retest subgroup., Conclusions: Measures from the four tools evaluated were moderately reliable. There may be a tester effect on reliabilities, specifically vHITs. Further research should repeat these analyses in a patient population and explore methodological differences between vHIT systems.

Background: Several different video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) systems exist. The function of each individual semicircular canal (SCC) may be determined by performing this test. All vHIT systems provide information about the function of the vestibular ocular reflex by means of two modalities: SACCADES and GAIN. However, different gain calculation methods exist., Objective: Primary endpoint:•Is instantaneous gain or regression gain the most reproducible and reliable gain value when performing vHIT with testing of the lateral SCCs?Secondary endpoints:•Comparison of each of the instantaneous gain values at 40, 60, and 80ms with the regression gain.•Examination of any intra- and inter examiner variability.•Mean instantaneous gain values, and at different velocities, compared with regression gain values of the lateral SCCs., Methods: 60 subjects between 18-65 years were included. All patients filled out the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire and underwent four separate vHIT tests, two by an experienced neurotologist and two by an inexperienced examiner., Results/conclusions: 240 datasets were obtained, displaying both regression and instantaneous gain values. Regression gain was more reproducible than instantaneous gain. The experienced examiner provided the most reproducible results.When comparing instantaneous gain, we found the gain at 40 ms to be the least reproducible. There was no significant difference between 60 ms and 80 ms.For both examiners no significant intra examiner variability was found.

Background: since the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak a growing number of symptoms and deficits associated with the new pathology have emerged, among them cochlear damage in otherwise asymptomatic COVID-19 patients has been described., Objective: to investigate general and audiovestibular symptoms and sequelae in healed patients, and to seek for any sign of residual or permanent hearing or vestibular loss., Methods: we reviewed the data coming from 48 Covid-19 patients whose nasopharyngeal swabs have turned negative, all employed at our facility, that opted in for a free screening of audiovestibular symptoms offered by our hospital after the aforementioned report was published. The screening included a tonal pure tone audiometry, a vHIT and SHIMP test, as well as a survey including known symptoms and audiovestibular symptoms., Results: general symptoms as reported by our patients largely reflect what reported by others in the literature. 4 (8.3%) patients reported hearing loss, 2 (4.2%) tinnitus, 4 dizziness (8.3%), 1 spinning vertigo (2%), 1 dynamic imbalance (2%), 3 static imbalance (6.3%). Most audiovestibular symptoms have regressed. Thresholds at pure tone audiometry and vHIT gain were within normality range in all post-Covid-19 patients., Conclusions: even if some patients suffer from audiovestibular symptoms, these are mostly transitory and there is no clear evidence of clinically relevant persistent cochlear or vestibular damage after recovery.

Background: Susac syndrome (retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculopathy, SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. In contrast to data regarding auditory function, data measuring vestibular function is sparse., Objective: To determine whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can serve as a confirmatory assessment of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in cases of suspected SuS., Methods: Seven patients diagnosed with SuS underwent pure tone audiometry, a word recognition test, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs), and the v-HIT., Results: Five patients were diagnosed with definite SuS, and two with probable SuS. Two patients were asymptomatic for hearing loss or tinnitus, and no sensorineural hearing loss was detected by audiograms. Four patients complained of tinnitus, and three patients reported experiencing vertigo. Three patients had abnormal cVEMPs results. All seven patients' vHIT results were normal, except for patient #2, who was one of the three who complained of vertigo. The calculated gain of her left anterior semicircular canal was 0.5, without saccades., Conclusions: This is the first study to describe the results of the vHIT and cVEMPs among a group of patients with SuS. The results suggest that the vHIT should not be the only exam used to assess the function of the vestibular system of SuS patients.

Background: International consensus on best practices for calculating and reporting vestibular function is lacking. Quantitative vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain using a video head impulse test (HIT) device can be calculated by various methods., Objective: To compare different gain calculation methods and to analyze interactions between artifacts and calculation methods., Methods: We analyzed 1300 horizontal HIT traces from 26 patients with acute vestibular syndrome and calculated the ratio between eye and head velocity at specific time points (40 ms, 60 ms) after HIT onset ('velocity gain'), ratio of velocity slopes ('regression gain'), and ratio of area under the curves after de-saccading ('position gain')., Results: There was no mean difference between gain at 60 ms and position gain, both showing a significant correlation (r2 = 0.77, p < 0.001) for artifact-free recordings. All artifacts reduced high, normal-range gains modestly (range -0.06 to -0.11). The impact on abnormal, low gains was variable (depending on the artifact type) compared to artifact-free recordings., Conclusions: There is no clear superiority of a single gain calculation method for video HIT testing. Artifacts cause small but significant reductions of measured VOR gains in HITs with higher, normal-range gains, regardless of calculation method. Artifacts in abnormal HITs with low gain increased measurement noise. A larger number of HITs should be performed to confirm abnormal results, regardless of calculation method.

Background: Susac syndrome (retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculopathy, SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. In contrast to data regarding auditory function, data measuring vestibular function is sparse and the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs)., Objective: To determine whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can serve as a confirmatory assessment of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in cases of suspected SuS., Methods: Seven patients diagnosed with SuS underwent pure tone audiometry, a word recognition test, cVEMPs and the vHIT., Results: Five patients were diagnosed with definite SuS, and two with probable SuS. Two patients were asymptomatic for hearing loss or tinnitus, and no sensorineural hearing loss was detected by audiograms. Four patients complained of tinnitus, and three patients reported experiencing vertigo. Three patients had abnormal cVEMPs results. All seven patients' vHIT results were normal, except for patient #2, who was one of the three who complained of vertigo. The calculated gain of her left anterior semicircular canal was 0.5, without saccades., Conclusions: This is the first study to describe the results of the vHIT and cVEMPs among a group of patients with SuS. The results suggest that the vHIT should not be the only exam used to assess the function of the vestibular system of SuS patients.

Introduction: Earlier work revealed that vHIT examination is often difficult to perform on very young children. In particular, the calibration of the system can be difficult, as active cooperation of the patient is required. Additionally, the patient must be able to follow the examiner's instructions, which is challenging for very young children. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a new, software-based approach enabling vHIT testing of young children and infants., Methods and Materials: Six patients (3 boys and 3 girls) aged 5-36 months were included in a prospective, monocentric study between January 2015 and August 2015.The newly developed intuitive software enabled calibration of the eye position signal with the subjects fixating on animated animal graphics which were projected on a screen. Testing ten healthy adults validated this new calibration and measurement method. After calibration, a vHIT goggle (EyeSeeCam ©) was used to perform head impulses in the horizontal plane while the patient was watching a movie sitting on their parent's lap or in a baby chair. At least 15 impulses to each side were obtained and the occurrence of refixation saccades was analyzed. All tests were performed by one of two experienced examiners., Results: The new calibration method and modified test setup provided reproducible results for all patients tested. An increased incidence of artifacts was not observed. In 2 patients, more than one test was needed. None of the included children showed catch-up overt or catch-up covert saccades. There was no gain reduction of more than two standard deviations as compared to the normative results published in the literature on vHIT examinations of children., Conclusion: The proposed protocol allows vHIT testing in very young children and infants (aged 5 months to 3 years). The study emphasizes that vHIT is an easy and sensitive screening tool to evaluate vestibular function in children and should be used as the gold standard in pediatric vestibular assessment.