Search

Carotid body tumors (CBTs), or chemodectomas, are rare, especially in the pediatric population. They often present with minimal symptoms, making timely diagnosis challenging. This case report and systematic review highlights a distinctive presentation and summarize the current evidence on pediatric CBTs. We report a case of a 13-year-old girl presenting with neck pain and a left-sided neck mass. After extensive evaluation, a Shamblin type III tumor was identified and removed surgically. Postoperatively, the patient experienced transient hypertension and significant dysphagia, both of which resolved within a few weeks with no permanent sequelae. Histology confirmed a benign paraganglioma. A systematic literature review of PubMed identified 29 cases from 23 published studies spanning from 1968 to 2024. The average age at diagnosis was 12.6 ± 3.6 years. The most common symptom was a neck mass or swelling, reported in 75% of cases (n = 21). Tumor sizes ranged from 1.3 to 8.0 cm, with Shamblin III being the most frequent classification. Gross total resection (n = 25 [89.3%]) alone or in combination with preoperative embolization (n = 10 [35.7%]) were the most common methods of management. In 62.1% of cases, there were no permanent complication or sequelae. The proximity to vital neurovascular structures and high vascularity in pediatric patients necessitates careful perioperative interdisciplinary management. Owing to their rarity and nonspecific presentation, CBTs often remain undiagnosed for years. They respond well to treatment, but can be fatal if untreated, underscoring the importance of including CBTs in the differential diagnosis of pediatric neck masses.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly advancing fields with increasing utility in health care. We conducted a survey to determine the perceptions of Canadian vascular surgeons toward AI/ML. Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed to 162 members of the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery. Self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions with respect to potential applications, limitations, and facilitators of AI/ML were assessed. Results: Overall, 50 of the 162 Canadian vascular surgeons (31%) responded to the survey. Most respondents were aged 30 to 59 years (72%), male (80%), and White (67%) and practiced in academic settings (72%). One half of the participants reported that their knowledge of AI/ML was poor or very poor. Most were excited or very excited about AI/ML (66%) and were interested or very interested in learning more about the field (83.7%). The respondents believed that AI/ML would be useful or very useful for diagnosis (62%), prognosis (72%), patient selection (56%), image analysis (64%), intraoperative guidance (52%), research (88%), and education (80%). The limitations that the participants were most concerned about were errors leading to patient harm (42%), bias based on patient demographics (42%), and lack of clinician knowledge and skills in AI/ML (40%). Most were not concerned or were mildly concerned about job replacement (86%). The factors that were most important to encouraging clinicians to use AI/ML models were improvements in efficiency (88%), accurate predictions (84%), and ease of use (84%). The comments from respondents focused on the pressing need for the implementation of AI/ML in vascular surgery owing to the potential to improve care delivery. Conclusions: Canadian vascular surgeons have positive views on AI/ML and believe this technology can be applied to multiple aspects of the specialty to improve patient care, research, and education. Current self-reported knowledge is poor, although interest was expressed in learning more about the field. The facilitators and barriers to the effective use of AI/ML identified in the present study can guide future development of these tools in vascular surgery.

We present two cases of thoracic outlet decompression performed to facilitate hemodialysis through upper limb arteriovenous fistulas. In patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula formation for dialysis access, venous hypertension is a well-known complication. We used a supraclavicular approach in our two reported cases to remove the first rib to facilitate hemodialysis. Dialysis patients presenting with central venous stenosis should be assessed for evidence of extrinsic compression by the first rib as management options differ from those with central venous stenosis due to an intravenous catheter.