Search

Background: The long-term benefit of revascularization for intermittent claudication is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with a noninvasive approach. Methods: The IRONIC trial (Invasive Revascularization or Not in Intermittent Claudication) randomized patients with mild-to-severe intermittent claudication to either revascularization + best medical therapy + structured exercise therapy (the revascularization group) or best medical therapy + structured exercise therapy (the nonrevascularization group). The health-related quality of life short form 36 questionnaire was primary outcome and disease-specific health-related quality of life (vascular quality of life questionnaire) and treadmill walking distances were secondary end points. Health-related quality of life has previously been reported superior in the revascularization group at 1- and 2-year follow-up. In this study, the 5-year results were determined. The cost-effectiveness of the treatment options was analyzed from a payer/healthcare standpoint. Results: Altogether, 158 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Regarding the primary end point, no intergroup differences were observed for the short form 36 sum or domain scores from baseline to 5 years, except for the short form 36 role emotional domain score, with greater improvement in the nonrevascularization group (n=116, P =0.007). No intergroup differences were observed in the vascular quality of life questionnaire total and domain scores (n=116, NS) or in treadmill walking distances (n=91, NS). A revascularization strategy resulted in almost twice the cost per patient compared with a noninvasive treatment approach ($13 098 versus $6965, P =0.02). Conclusions: After 5 years of follow-up, a revascularization strategy had lost its early benefit and did not result in any long-term improvement in health-related quality of life or walking capacity compared to a noninvasive treatment strategy. Revascularization was not a cost-effective treatment option from a payer/healthcare point of view. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01219842.

Objectives The aims of this population based study were to describe mid- to long-term amputation risk, cumulative incidence of death or amputation, and differences in pre-operative comorbidities in patients revascularised for lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods This was an observational cohort study. Data from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Vascular Surgery (Swedvasc) were combined with mandatory national health care registries and patient medical records. All patients who underwent revascularisation in Sweden between May 2008 and May 2013 for intermittent claudication (IC) or critical limb ischaemia (CLI), aged 50 years and older, were identified through the Swedvasc database. The mandatory national health care registries and medical records provided data on comorbidities, mortality, and major amputations. Results A total of 16,889 patients with PAD (IC, n = 6272; CLI, n = 10,617) were studied. The incidence of amputations in IC patients was 0.4% (range 0.3%–0.5%) per year. Among CLI patients, the amputation rate during the first 6 months following revascularisation was 12.0% (95% CI 11.3–12.6). Thereafter, the incidence declined to approximately 2% per year. The cumulative combined incidence of death or amputation 3 years after revascularisation was 12.9% (95% CI 12.0–13.9) in IC patients and 48.8% (95% CI 47.7–49.8) in CLI patients. Among CLI patients, compared with IC patients, the prevalence of diabetes, ischaemic stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation was approximately doubled and renal failure was nearly tripled, even after age standardisation. Conclusion The risk of amputation is particularly high during the first 6 months following revascularisation for CLI. IC patients have a benign course in terms of limb loss. Mortality in both IC and CLI patients is substantial. Revascularised CLI patients have different comorbidities from IC patients.

Objective Long-term progression of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) as initial manifestation of atherosclerotic arterial disease is not well described. Cardiovascular (CV) risk was examined in different PAD populations diagnosed in a hospital setting in Sweden. Methods Data for this retrospective cohort study were retrieved by linking data on morbidity, medication use, and mortality from Swedish national registries. Primary CV outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke (IS), and CV death. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for describing risk and relative risk. Results Of 66,189 patients with an incident PAD diagnosis (2006-2013), 40,136 had primary PAD, 16,786 had PAD + coronary heart disease (CHD), 5803 had PAD + IS, and 3464 had PAD + IS + CHD. One-year cumulative incidence rates of major CV events for the groups were 12%, 21%, 29%, and 34%, respectively. Corresponding numbers for 1-year all-cause death were 16%, 22%, 33%, and 35%. Compared with the primary PAD population, the relative risk increase for CV events was highest in patients with PAD + IS + CHD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01), followed by PAD + IS (HR, 1.87) and PAD + CHD (HR, 1.42). Despite being younger, the primary PAD population was less intensively treated with secondary preventive drug therapy. Conclusions PAD as initial manifestation of atherosclerotic disease diagnosed in a hospital-based setting conferred a high risk: one in eight patients experienced a major CV event and one in six patients died within 1 year. Despite younger age and substantial risk of future major CV events, patients with primary PAD received less intensive secondary preventive drug therapy.

Objectives The use of an intraoperative shunt is an established technique used to reduce the ischemic time after acute arterial obstruction or in the prevention of hypoperfusion due to complex open vascular or endovascular operative procedures. To date, described methods of temporary extremity blood perfusion have required open surgical techniques. Methods An endovascular shunt (ES) was formed by connecting two introducer sheaths to each other, one positioned proximal and one distal to an arterial obstruction. The ES method was used in patients considered to be at high risk for prolonged lower limb ischemia in conjunction with a vascular procedure and where shunt creation by open surgical technique was not considered to be a practical alternative. The flow capacity of the ES was defined in a desktop model. Results The ES method was used clinically in 15 vascular interventions including eight complex endovascular aortic procedures, three open aortic operations, and four procedures for acute limb ischemia. The shunts were functional in all patients and there were no shunt occlusions. Postoperatively, there were no evident clinical reperfusion injuries. Flow analysis revealed that the ES had a flow capacity of 73% flow capacity compared to a Pruitt-Inahara shunt. Conclusion A new method of temporary blood shunting in connection to vascular procedures has been demonstrated.

ObjectivePeripheral artery disease (PAD) is common worldwide, and PAD patients are increasingly offered lower limb revascularization procedures. The aim of this population-based study was to describe the current risk for cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality and also to elucidate the current pharmacologic treatment patterns in revascularized lower limb PAD patients.MethodsThis observational, retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively collected linked data retrieved from mandatory Swedish national health care registries. The Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery database was used to identify revascularized PAD patients. Current risk for CV events and death was analyzed, as were prescribed drugs aimed for secondary prevention. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to explore risk factors for suffering a CV event.ResultsBetween May 2008 and December 2013, there were 18,742 revascularized PAD patients identified. Mean age was 70.0 years among patients with intermittent claudication (IC; n = 6959) and 76.8 years among patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI; n = 11,783). Antiplatelet therapy, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta-blockers were used by 73%, 60%, 57%, and 49% at admission for revascularization. CV event rate (a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or CV death) at 12, 24, and 36 months was 5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-5.6), 9.5% (95% CI, 8.7-10.3), and 13.8% (95% CI, 12.8-14.8) in patients with IC and 16.8% (95% CI, 16.1-17.6), 25.9% (95% CI, 25.0-26.8), and 34.3% (95% CI, 33.2-35.4) in patients with CLI. Best medical treatment, defined as any antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy along with statin treatment, was offered to 65% of IC patients and 45% of CLI patients with little change during the study period. Statin therapy was associated with reduced CV events (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81; P < .001), whereas treatment with low-dose aspirin was not.ConclusionsRevascularized PAD patients are still at a high risk for CV events without a declining time trend. A large proportion of both IC and CLI patients were not offered best medical treatment. The most commonly used agent was aspirin, which was not associated with CV event reduction. This study calls for improved medical management and highlights an important and partly unmet medical need among revascularized PAD patients.