1. Model studies of tunneling time
- Author
-
Z. H. Huang, T. E. Sullivan, E. Kazes, Paul H. Cutler, T.E. Feuchtwang, and H. Q. Nguyen
- Subjects
Physics ,Wave packet ,Scanning tunneling spectroscopy ,Spin polarized scanning tunneling microscopy ,Surfaces and Interfaces ,Expectation value ,Condensed Matter::Mesoscopic Systems and Quantum Hall Effect ,Condensed Matter Physics ,Surfaces, Coatings and Films ,law.invention ,law ,Quantum mechanics ,Rectangular potential barrier ,Scanning tunneling microscope ,Wave function ,Quantum tunnelling - Abstract
The precise definition and physical interpretation of a tunneling time is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. The lack of a well‐defined time operator in quantum theory precludes the calculation of time in terms of an expectation value. Consequently, model calculations and simulation studies have been proposed and used to determine the time for a particle to traverse a quantum‐mechanical barrier. The results offer both qualitatively and quantitatively, disparate predictions. One of the more commonly used approaches is the phase method, which we have applied to several one‐dimensional model potentials to show that the tunneling time is characterized by the ratio of the typical decay length in the barrier to the incident velocity, τ∼(1/κ)/v0. We also show that the phase and the spin precession methods are equivalent when the magnetic field is applied throughout the space containing the particle wave function and the tunneling barrier. In principle, the spin precession method can be regarded as an operational definition of the tunneling time. It also has been shown that a tunneling time can be defined operationally for a time‐dependent barrier, for which the model calculations predict a tunneling time given by the mean barrier width divided by the magnitude of the imaginary velocity of the particle in the barrier, τ∼d/‖v‖. This pseudokinematic result has been inferred by magnetic field dependent tunneling through heterostructures and computer simulation of wave packet tunneling through one‐dimensional square barriers. Other tunneling time theories predict one or the other of the above mentioned characteristic times; several theories predict both. We interpret these different results for τ to mean that a tunneling time is not uniquely defined as a function of particle energy and the barrier shape unless the process in which the tunneling is involved is also specified. That is, the tunneling time is a meaningful and unique concept only for particular tunneling processes or definite operational procedures.
- Published
- 1990