Search

Contains fulltext : 232751.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Clinical research in venous thromboembolism (VTE) is hindered by variability in the collection and reporting of data and outcomes. A consistent data language facilitates efficiencies, leads to higher quality data, and permits between-study comparisons and evidence synthesis. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) launched an international task force of more than 50 researchers to develop common data elements for clinical research in venous thromboembolism. The project was organized in seven working groups, each focusing on a topic area: General Core Data Elements; Anticoagulation and Other Therapies; Chronic VTE and Functional Outcomes; Diagnosis of VTE; Malignancy; Perioperative; and Predictors of VTE. The groups met via teleconference to collaboratively identify key data elements and develop definitions and data standards that were structured in a project-specific taxonomy. A Steering Committee met by teleconference and in-person to determine the overall scope of the project and resolve questions arising from the working groups. ISTH held an open public comment period to enable broader stakeholder involvement and feedback. The common data elements were then refined by the working groups to create a set of 512 unique data elements that are publicly available at http://isth.breakthrough.healthcare. The ISTH VTE Common Data Elements are intended to be a living project with ongoing curation, future expansion, and adaptation to meet the needs of the thrombosis and hemostasis research community.

Background International guidelines recommend using the Villalta score (VS) to diagnose the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). However, a high proportion of PTS detected with VS could just reflect the presence of preexisting primary venous insufficiency (PVI). Furthermore, it is unclear whether the contralateral VS (cl-VS) can be used to assess for preexisting PVI. Objectives To estimate whether cl-VS can be used to assess for preexisting PVI, and to assess the proportion of PTS that could be attributable to preexisting PVI. Methods Subanalysis of the SOX multicenter randomized trial focusing on patients with a first unilateral proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) followed for up to 2 years. PVI was defined as a baseline cl-VS > 4, and PTS as VS > 4 in the leg ipsilateral to DVT starting 6 months after DVT. Results Among 680 patients, mean cl-VS remained stable over time: 1.23 (standard deviation [SD] ±2.49) at baseline and 1.17 (±2.20), 1.59 (±2.81), 1.54 (±2.50), 1.65 (±2.82), and 1.55 (±2.63) at the 1-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month visits, respectively. Baseline cl-VS and ipsilateral VS measured during follow-up were mildly correlated (Pearson correlation = 0.13-0.25). This association disappeared after subtracting the cl-VS measured at the same visit from the ipsilateral VS. Overall, 48.8% of patients developed PTS of whom 12.8% had baseline cl-VS > 4. Conclusion In our study of patients with a first unilateral proximal DVT, the proportion of patients with PTS who had a cl-VS > 4 is modest. However, cl-VS appears to be stable over time. Its assessment could constitute a simple way of documenting preexisting PVI and help to classify patients as having PTS.

Essentials Clinical significance of cancer-related isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) is unknown. We studied patients with iDDVT, with and without cancer, and proximal DVT with cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a much poorer prognosis than iDDVT patients without cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a similar prognosis to cancer-related proximal DVT patients. SummaryBackground Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) (infra-popliteal DVT without pulmonary embolism [PE]) is a frequent event and, in the absence of cancer, is usually considered to be a minor form of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT is unknown. Methods Using data from the observational, prospective multicenter OPTIMEV cohort, we compared, at 3 years, the incidences of death, VTE recurrence and major bleeding in patients with cancer-related iDDVT with those in cancer patients with isolated proximal DVT (matched 1:1 on age and sex) and patients with iDDVT without cancer (matched 1:2 on age and sex). Results As compared with patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT (n = 92), those with cancer-related iDDVT (n = 92) had a similar risk of death (40.8% per patient-year (PY) vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 1.0, 95% CI[0.7–1.4]) and of major bleeding (3.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY, aCHR = 0.9 [0.3–3.2]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.4% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 1.8 [0.7–4.5]). As compared with patients with iDDVT without cancer (n = 184), those with cancer-related iDDVT had a nine times higher risk of death (3.5% per PY vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 9.3 [5.5–15.9]), a higher risk of major bleeding (1.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [0.6–6.1]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.0% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [1.0–3.7]). The results remained similar in the subgroup of patients without history of VTE. Conclusion Patients with cancer-related iDDVT seem to have a prognosis that is similar to that of patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT and a dramatically poorer prognosis than patients with iDDVT without cancer. This underlines the high clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT and the need for additional studies.

The Sapporo criteria-related definition commonly used for diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) associates the occurrence of thrombotic and/or obstetrical events with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL-Ab), including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin IgG (aCL-G) or IgM, and/or anti-b2-glycoprotein I IgG or IgM antibodies. Criteria used to define the purely obstetrical clinical subtype of the APS syndrome include the aPLs listed above plus a fetal loss later than 10-weeks gestation, 3 or more unexplained consecutive embryonic losses before the 10th week gestation, or eclampsia or features of placental insufficiency requiring the preterm birth before 34 weeks of a morphologically normal child. Some investigators have questioned the serological criteria associated with this form of APS and have suggested that the aCL-G, anticardiolipin IgM, and anti-b2-glycoprotein I IgM measurements should be excluded. To determine the effects of the various aPL-Ab subtypes on pregnancy outcome, the investigators prospectively monitored women who had had an unexplained embryonic loss during their first pregnancy and were undergoing their untreated second pregnancy. They selected women who did not have APS; any hormonal abnormalities; or inflammatory, infectious, or malignant diseases; and who had normal parental karyotypes; the pregnancy outcomes of 142 women who tested positive for at least 1 of the 5 classical aPL-Abs were compared with those of 142 control women who were confirmed to be aPL-Abs negative. Compared with the women without aPL-Abs, the aPL-Ab-positive women experienced more clinical complications during their second pregnancy, including pregnancy loss (of which the majority were embryonic losses), preeclampsia, placental abruption, and intrauterine fetal growth restriction. The presence of LAC alone (type IIa aPL-Ab positivity) was associated with the highest risk of recurrent embryonic loss and intrauterine growth restriction. Positive tests for combinations of aPL-Ab (type I aPL-Ab positivity) were associated with the highest risk of late complications, placental abruption, and preeclampsia. A finding of anti-b2-glycoprotein I IgM positivity had no apparent diagnostic clinical relevance. These findings demonstrate that among women with a first unexplained pregnancy loss before the 10th week of gestation, those who are aPL-Abs positive have a higher risk of complications in their next pregnancy, including embryonic loss, preeclampsia, placental abruption, and intrauterine growth restriction, than women who are aPL-Abs negative. These findings suggest that the aPL-Ab LAC, aCL-G or IgM, and anti-b2-glycoprotein I IgG are helpful in identifying patients at increased risk of an adverse outcome, whereas anti-b2-glycoprotein I IgM has questionable diagnostic value.

Summary. Background: The clinical significance of symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is uncertain. Consequently, this leads to important disparities in its management. Objective: To examine the clinical history of isolated distal DVT and to compare it with that of proximal DVT. Methods: Using data from the international, prospective, RIETE registry on patients with confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), we compared the risk factors and 3-month outcome in patients with isolated distal DVT vs. proximal DVT. Results: Eleven thousand and eighty-six patients with symptomatic DVT, but without pulmonary embolism, were included between 2001 and 2008; 1921 (17.3%) exhibited isolated distal DVT. Anticoagulant treatment was received by 89.1% (1680/1885) of isolated distal DVT and 91.8% (7911/8613) of proximal DVT patients for the entire follow-up period. Isolated distal DVTs were more associated with transient risk factors (i.e. recent travel, hospitalization, recent surgery), whereas proximal DVTs were more associated with chronic states (i.e. ≥75 years or with active cancer). At 3 months, major bleeding rate was lower in patients with isolated distal DVT (1.0% vs. 2.2%, P