1. A Randomized Controlled Study of Integrated Smoking Cessation in a Lung Cancer Screening Program
- Author
-
Paul Burrowes, Jane Huang, Alain Tremblay, Huiming Yang, James A. Dickinson, Paul MacEachern, Niloofar Taghizadeh, Rommy Koetzler, Eric L.R. Bédard, Martin C. Tammemägi, Kathryn L. Taylor, Stephen Lam, Debra Kasowski, and Andrew J. Graham
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Referral ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Abstinence ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oncology ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,Cohort ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Smoking cessation ,business ,Lung cancer screening ,Mass screening ,media_common - Abstract
Introduction Smoking cessation activities incorporated into lung cancer screening programs have been broadly recommended, but studies to date have not shown increased quit rates associated with cessation programs in this setting. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of smoking cessation counseling in smokers presenting for lung cancer screening. Methods This study is a randomized control trial of an intensive telephone-based smoking cessation counseling intervention incorporating lung cancer screening results versus usual care (information pamphlet). All active smokers enrolled in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study cohort were randomized on a 1:1 ratio with a primary endpoint of self-reported 30-day abstinence at 12 months. Results A total of 345 active smokers participating in the screening study were randomized to active smoking cessation counseling (n = 171) or control arm (n = 174). Thirty-day smoking abstinence at 12 months post-randomization was noted in 22 of 174 (12.6%) and 24 of 171 (14.0%) of participants in the control and intervention arms, respectively, a 1.4% difference (95% confidence interval: -5.9 to 8.7, p = 0.7). No statistically significant differences in 7-day or point abstinence were noted, nor were differences at 6 months or 24 months. Conclusions A telephone-based smoking cessation counseling intervention incorporating lung cancer screening results did not result in increased 12-month cessation rates versus written information alone in unselected smokers undergoing lung cancer screening. Routine referral of all current smokers to counseling-based cessation programs may not improve long-term cessation in this patient cohort. Future studies should specifically focus on this subgroup of older long-term smokers to determine the optimal method of integrating smoking cessation with lung cancer screening (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02431962).
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF