Search

Background and Objective: Prolonged air leak (PAL) following lung resection is related to an increase in morbidity and both direct and indirect costs. In recent years, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has proved to be a safe technique with comparable perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), optimal oncological results, and potential advantages in case of sublobar resection. We here focus on the incidence and clinical impact of PAL in the field of robotic surgery and discuss the therapeutic strategies currently available., Methods: We conducted a search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus database from inception until May 27 th 2022 to select the relevant literature published in English exploring the occurrence of PAL following RATS., Key Content and Findings: The implementation of robotic surgery led to a significant reduction in PAL occurrence after pulmonary resection compared to open thoracotomy, while there is still no clear advantage with respect to VATS. However, the enhanced dexterity and improved visualization of the robot seem to particularly valuable in case of sublobar lung resection, especially complex ones. Accurate selection of patients based on the presence of risk factors allows the implementation of intraoperative measures in order to reduce the occurrence of PAL., Conclusions: Robotic lung resection is a safe technique, advantageous compared to traditional open thoracotomy in terms of PAL occurrence reduction and it is a valid alternative to manual VATS. Moreover, with the extension of indications for sublobar resection in the treatment of early stage lung cancer, RATS may prove to be the technique of choice thanks to its intrinsic advantages., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-818/coif). The special series “Prolonged Air Leak after Lung Surgery: Prediction, Prevention and Management” was sponsored by Bard Limited. Bard Limited has no interference on the contents of the special series. GV received grants from Umberto Veronesi Foundation, Intuitive Surgical Inc., AIRC, Italian Ministry of Health and Inail. GV is a consultant for Ab Medica SpA, Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Segmentectomy has gained popularity in the latest years as a valid alternative to lobectomy. Initially reserved to patient unfit for lobar lung resection, this procedure is now offered also in selected patient with <2 cm peripheral lung cancer confined to an anatomic segment with no nodal involvement on preoperative evaluation. The introduction of screening with low-dose CT chest scan allowed the identification of lung cancer at early stages, making possible to schedule a more conservative lung surgery. A major improvement came also from minimally invasive surgery (MIS), reducing complication rate with comparable survival rates when compared to open surgery. However, due to long learning curve and uncomfortable instruments handling of video-assisted thoracoscopy, many surgeons still prefer to perform segmentectomies through a thoracotomy and thus increasing perioperative morbidity and leading to post-thoracotomy syndrome due to rib-spreading. Robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) can avoid this throwback, combining the handling of open surgery with lesser invasiveness of thoracoscopy. Although literature has given strong evidences in favour of robotic lobectomies, data are still limited regarding segmentectomies performed with this technique. Moreover, no results are still available from the two ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing segmentectomy to lobectomy and so the latter represent the oncologically proper procedure for lung cancer along with lymph-node dissection. In this review we analyse the literature currently available on outcomes of lobar and sublobar anatomical resection performed by RATS, with a brief mention of the existing surgical techniques of port positioning and the costs of this procedure., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1752). The series “Robotic Thoracic Surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. GV serves an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease from Jan 2020 to Dec 2021. GV reports grants from INAIL, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Ab Medica, personal fees from Johnson & Johnson, grants from Intuitive, outside the submitted work. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

During the last decades, women have been discouraged from entering the medical career and in particular in the surgical specialties. This situation is changing across continents and national and international initiatives are supporting aspiring female surgeons in pursuing the surgical career through mentorship and fellowship programmes. Due to the differences in training programmes, Health Care systems and cultural backgrounds, it's not easy to describe unanimously the pathways and obstacles that junior female thoracic surgeons are experiencing in Europe. The development of female surgical associations, mentorship programmes and national initiatives will further champion the gender equality in this specialty across Europe. During the recent years, the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) has established initiatives like the first ESTS Women in Thoracic Surgery Scientific Session or the annual Women in Thoracic ESTS Reception during the Annual Conference, which are done in an effort to encourage all female colleagues to join this specialty and increase the opportunity to share their experience and meet potential mentors. In this article we will depict the situation in some of the European countries whose female thoracic surgeons have led their way. We aim to give the next generation the examples that can influence women's choice of surgical career, and the possible strategies and initiatives to reduce the gender discrimination within healthcare., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2020-wts-09). The series “Women in Thoracic Surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. CP served as an unpaid Guest Editor of the series and serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease from Sept 2018 to Aug 2020. Dr. GV reports grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Ministry of Health, Istituto nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Ab Medica, personal fees from Johnson & Johnson, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Use of low-dose CT scan allows detection of lung cancer at early stages, enabling a more conservative surgery and a better long-term survival in those patients. In this scenario, intentional anatomical segmentectomy is gaining consent over standard lobectomy among surgeons. A minimally invasive approach such as VATS reduced invasiveness and complication rate compared to open surgery, but this technique comes also with some disadvantages in terms of dexterity and intuitiveness. Robotic surgery allows to overcome those limitations, making segmentectomies easier and safer to perform. In addition, it offers the possibility to utilize intravenous indocyanine green to define the intersegmental plane, allowing a more precise surgery. We reviewed the literature and describe the technique of the robot assisted segmentectomy with a focus on the new technologies available nowadays., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.02.53). The series “Early Stage Lung Cancer: Sublobar Resections are a Choice?” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complete thymectomy is recommended for thymic malignancies to reduce local recurrence and the likelihood of the long-term development of myasthenia gravis (MG). Thymus-conserving surgery (thymomectomy) seems to yield similar results, but evidence is still limited. The objective of this study was to assess if the oncological outcome, in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), are comparable between radical thymectomy vs. conservative thymomectomy patients, and to assess if the outcome of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach was similar to open surgery approach., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 157 consecutive patients with either resectable thymoma or thymic carcinoma from two Italian centers (Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, and Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo) between 1997 and 2013 who underwent thymomectomy or extended thymectomy with the VATS or open approach; the patients with Miastenia Gravis underwent radical thymectomy. The patients were followed through physical examinations and phone interviews., Results: Thymomectomy and thymectomy were performed on 86 (54.8%) and 71 (45.2%) patients, respectively. Prognostic factors and comorbidities were comparable in the two groups. The median follow-up was 77 months. Cox proportional hazards model revealed that Masaoka advanced stage and thymic carcinoma of WHO classification were independent predictive factors for overall survival, but that the extent of surgery and the approach used (minimally invasive versus open) were not. Notably, five- and ten-year survival rates were similar in the two groups., Conclusions: In our experience, radical thymectomy and conservative thymomectomy did not differ in terms of disease-free and overall survival rates. In nonmyasthenic patients with early-stage resectable thymic malignancy, minimally invasive thymomectomy provided equivalent results to open thymectomy. Our results should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective nature of the study. Well-designed, adequately-powered studies should be very welcome to increase the quantity and the quality of clinical evidence before incorporating this procedure in future guidelines., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: G Veronesi had financial relationship with Medtronic, Abmedica and Versurgical for consultation and proctoring. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Robotic surgery is increasingly used to resect lung cancer. However costs are high. We compared costs and outcomes for robotic surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), and open surgery, to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: We retrospectively assessed 103 consecutive patients given lobectomy or segmentectomy for clinical stage I or II NSCLC. Three surgeons could choose VATS or open, the fourth could choose between all three techniques. Between-group differences were assessed by Fisher's exact, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. P values <0.05 were considered significant., Results: Twenty-three patients were treated by robot, 41 by VATS, and 39 by open surgery. Age, physical status, pulmonary function, comorbidities, stage, and perioperative complications did not differ between the groups. Pathological tumor size was greater in the open than VATS and robotic groups (P=0.025). Duration of surgery was 150, 191 and 116 minutes, by robotic, VATS and open approaches, respectively (P<0.001). Significantly more lymph node stations were removed (P<0.001), and median length of stay was shorter (4, 5 and 6 days, respectively; P<0.001) in the robotic than VATS and open groups. Estimated costs were 82%, 68% and 69%, respectively, of the regional health service reimbursement for robotic, VATS and open approaches., Discussion: Robotic surgery for early lung cancer was associated with shorter stay and more extensive lymph node dissection than VATS and open surgery. Duration of surgery was shorter for robotic than VATS. Although the cost of robotic thoracic surgery is high, the hospital makes a profit., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: G Veronesi is a consultant for ABI Medica SpA and Medtronic, other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

In the last few years, robotic approach for anatomic lung resection has brought an innovative development in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. This study analyzes the technical aspects of performing the hilar dissection for a lobectomy via robotic approach. With a detailed step-by-step description and essential tips and videos, in this paper, we report the procedure to carry out a four-arm robotic middle and lower lobectomy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The Society for Translational Medicine and The Chinese Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery conducted a systematic review of the literature in an attempt to improve our understanding in the postoperative management of chest tubes of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. Recommendations were produced and classified based on an internationally accepted GRADE system. The following recommendations were extracted in the present review: (I) chest tubes can be removed safely with daily pleural fluid of up to 450 mL (non-chylous and non-sanguinous), which may reduce chest tube duration and hospital length of stay (2B); (II) in rare instances, e.g., persistent abundant fluid production, the use of PrR P/B <0.5 when evaluating fluid output to determine chest tube removal might be beneficial (2B); (III) it is recommended that one chest tube is adequate following pulmonary lobectomy, except for hemorrhage and space problems (2A); (IV) chest tube clearance by milking and stripping is not recommended after lung resection (2B); (V) chest tube suction is not necessary for patients undergoing lobectomy after first postoperative day (2A); (VI) regulated chest tube suction [-11 (-1.08 kPa) to -20 (1.96 kPa) cmH 2 O depending upon the type of lobectomy] is not superior to regulated seal [-2 (0.196 kPa) cmH 2 O] when electronic drainage systems are used after lobectomy by thoracotomy (2B); (VII) chest tube removal recommended at the end of expiration and may be slightly superior to removal at the end of inspiration (2A); (VIII) electronic drainage systems are recommended in the management of chest tube in patients undergoing lobectomy (2B)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Competing Interests: G Veronesi reports receiving personal fees from Ab medica SpA; grants from the Italian National Insurance Institute for Workplace Injuries (INAIL), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive approach with several advantages over open thoracotomy for the surgery of lung cancer but also some limitations like rigid instruments and suboptimal vision. Robot technology is an evolution of manual videothoracoscopy introduced to overcome these limitations maintaining the advantages related to low invasiveness. More intuitive movements, greater flexibility and high definition three-dimensional vision are advantages of the robotic approach. Different studies demonstrate that robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy are feasible and safe with long term outcome similar to that of open/VATS approaches, however no randomised comparison are available and benefits in terms of quality of life (QOL) and pain need to be demonstrated yet. Several different robotic techniques are currently employed and differ for number of robotic arms (three versus four), the use of CO2 insufflation, timing of utility incision and the port positioning. The four arms robotic approach with anterior utility incision is the technique described by the authors. Indications to perform robotic lung resections may be more extensive than those of traditional videothoracoscpic approach and includes patients with locally advanced disease after chemotherapy or those requiring anatomical segmentectomy. Learning curve of vats and robotic lung resection is similar. High capital and running costs are the most important disadvantages. Entry of competitor companies should drive down costs.