Search

Background: The Chinese government has pay attention about tuberculosis infection among medical staff in infectious disease hospitals, but the effects have not yet been reported. This study will explore latent infection and immune function in the medical staff and systematically analyze the associated influencing factors., Methods: Ninety-four medical staffs were enrolled and 20 medical staffs were defined as low risk group and others were high risk group. We used IFN-γ release assay and flow cytometry to analyze the latent TB infection status and immune function. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors of latent TB infection., Results: This study explored and compared the infection status of medical workers and found that the rate of positive TB-IGRA results was higher among high risk group than in low risk group. Working environment, occupational history and work type were risk factors for TB infection in hospital. This study also found that high risk group had higher IFN-γ expression and a lower ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T cells and further analysis found that this immune disorder is associated with wards and occupations., Conclusions: This study through rigorous sample collection and analysis found the risk factors of latent tuberculosis infection in health care workers. This finding may provide a theoretical basis to be used by the countries with a high TB burden to further improve their strategies for the prevention of TB infections in hospitals and may give an indication for improving the personal health of medical staff in infectious disease hospitals., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Patients undergoing major thoracic surgery especially for cancers are at a high risk of perioperative thromboembolism. Current guidelines recommended either heparin sodium (unfractionated heparin) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for those patients at high risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the rational timing of starting heparin has not yet been well established, because DVT can be caused by not only surgery but also comorbidities as well as prolonged hospital stay, and thoracic surgeons always concerned about heparin-related increased risk of intra- or post-operative bleeding. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the safety profile of preoperative administration of heparin for thromboprophylaxis in Chinese patients intended for thoracoscopic major thoracic surgery., Methods: From June to August 2016, patients intended for thoracoscopic lobectomy, esophagectomy, and thymectomy were randomly assigned into two groups: the case group (starting heparin sodium 5,000 U, bid preoperatively upon the admission into our department) and the control group (starting heparin sodium 5,000 U, bid postoperatively from postoperative day 1). The baseline data including demographic data and preoperative conditions were collected. The end points included operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative chest tube drainage volume and duration as well as lab coagulation function data., Results: A total of 58 qualified patients were randomized into case group (29 patients) and control group (29 patients), and after excluding 6 conversion patients, the case group and control group each had 26 patients for analysis. The baseline data of the two groups were comparable. Operation time (P=0.368), intraoperative bleeding volume (P=0.231), postoperative drainage days (P=0.466), and mean drainage volume per day (P=0.108) were not significantly increased in case group compared with those of control group. Moreover, there were no significant differences of perioperative coagulation function between these two groups., Conclusions: Preoperative administration of heparin for thromboprophylaxis in Chinese patients intended for thoracoscopic major thoracic surgery was safe and feasible., Trial Registration: NCT02940444 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Assist/control (A/C) ventilation may induce delirium in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We conducted a trial to determine whether initial synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support (SIMV + PS) could improve clinical outcomes in these patients., Methods: Intubated patients with moderate ARDS were enrolled and we compared SIMV + PS with A/C. Identical sedation, analgesia and ventilation strategies were performed. The co-primary outcomes were early (≤72 h) partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) and incidence of delirium. The secondary outcomes were all-cause in-hospital mortality, dosages of analgesics and sedatives, incidence of patient-ventilator asynchrony, and duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay., Results: We screened 2,684 patients and 40 patients were enrolled in our study. In SIMV + PS, early (≤72 h) PaO2/FiO2 was greater improved than that at baseline and that in A/C (P<0.05) with lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (8.7±3.0 vs. 10.3±3.2, P<0.001) and FiO2 (58%±18% vs. 67%±19%, P<0.001). We found more SIMV + PS success (defined as SIMV + PS successfully applied without switching to A/C) (100.0% vs. 16.7%, P<0.001), less male (46.3% vs. 85.7%, P=0.015) and pulmonary etiology of ARDS (53.8% vs. 92.9%, P=0.015), and lower PEEP (9.1±3.1 vs. 10.3±3.3, P=0.004) and FiO2 (58%±19% vs. 71%±19%, P<0.001) in survival patients. However, there were no significant differences in incidence of delirium and mortality, dosages of analgesics and sedatives, incidence of patient-ventilator asynchrony, duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay (P>0.05)., Conclusions: In patients with moderate ARDS, SIMV + PS can safely and effectively improve oxygenation, but does not decrease mortality, incidence of delirium and patient-ventilator asynchrony, dosages of analgesics and sedatives, and duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay.