Search

Background The appropriate surgical modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among the elderly remains controversial; identifying appropriate modalities will be helpful in clinical practice. Methods It's a cohort study and we explored the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for identifying patients aged ≥70 years with pathologic stage IA NSCLC. Three types of surgeries were compared (lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection) via survival and stratification analyses. Results Overall, 6,197 patients were enrolled. Among patients aged ≥76 years with tumor diameters ≤1 cm, significant differences in survival were noted for segmentectomy vs. lobectomy [hazard ratio (HR) =0.294, P=0.007] and wedge resection vs. lobectomy (HR =0.548, P=0.017) but not in those with tumors diameters >1 cm. Among patients aged 70-75 years with tumor diameters >1-2 cm, significant differences in survival were observed for segmentectomy vs. lobectomy (HR =0.671, P=0.037) and segmentectomy vs. wedge resection (HR =0.556, P=0.003) and for wedge resection vs. lobectomy (HR =1.283, P=0.003) among those with tumor diameters >2-3 cm but not in those with tumor diameters ≤1 cm. Conclusions Both age and tumor size should be considered when selecting the surgical modality. Lobectomy is not recommended for lesions ≤1 cm among patients aged ≥76 years. Segmentectomy was associated with superior prognosis for tumor diameters >1-2 cm and survival favored lobectomy rather than wedge resection for NSCLCs >2-3 cm among patients aged 70-75 years. Surgeons could rely on personal experience to determine the appropriate surgical modality for NSCLCs >1 cm among patients aged ≥76 years and NSCLCs ≤1 cm among patients aged 70-75 years.

BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma is a type of rare and highly malignant tumor. Limited information was available on prognostic factors of late-stage thymic carcinoma. The aim of this study was to identify factors that impact prognosis and to define the relationship between survival and surgical intervention in patients with Masaoka stage IV thymic carcinoma. METHODS: From 1973 to 2015, a total of 311 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study with pathologic confirmed Masaoka stage IV thymic carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox-regression analyses and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to evaluate prognosis. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, larger tumor size, distant metastasis and positive lymph node status were associated with poorer outcome. After PSM, no receipt of surgery was the prognostic factor indicating poorer survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.985, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.007–3.913, P=0.048 for overall survival (OS); HR 1.649, 95% CI: 1.009–2.697, P=0.046 for disease-specific survival (DSS)]. Subgroup analysis indicated that significantly improved survival with surgery was observed in patients who were