Search

: Introduction: The CUSTOMIZE hybrid III implementation‐effectiveness study evaluated implementation of once‐monthly long‐acting (LA) cabotegravir + rilpivirine in diverse US healthcare settings. Here, we report patient participant perspectives after 12 months in CUSTOMIZE. Methods: CUSTOMIZE was a phase IIIb, 12‐month study conducted from July 2019 to October 2020 at eight diverse US HIV clinics that enrolled virologically suppressed people living with HIV‐1 (PLHIV) on a stable oral regimen to receive monthly cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA injections after a 1‐month oral lead‐in. Participants were administered quantitative surveys before injections at months 1 (baseline), 4 and 12. A randomly selected subset of participants was interviewed at baseline and month 12. Data collection at month 12 was completed by October 2020 (during the COVID‐19 pandemic). Results: At baseline, 109 and 34 participants completed surveys and interviews, respectively; 87% were male; 35% were Black or African American. All participants who remained in the study at month 12 (n = 102) maintained HIV‐1 RNA Conclusions: Once‐monthly cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA was highly acceptable among PLHIV who were virologically suppressed on a stable antiretroviral regimen and interested in trying LA therapy, with few participants reporting challenges receiving LA injections. Implementation data from CUSTOMIZE suggest that monthly LA injections provide a convenient and appealing treatment option for PLHIV., INTRODUCTION Cabotegravir + rilpivirine is the first complete long‐acting (LA) injectable regimen recommended by treatment guidelines and indicated for the maintenance of virologic suppression in people living with HIV‐1 (PLHIV) [...]

: Introduction: CUSTOMIZE evaluated the implementation of long‐acting (LA) cabotegravir + rilpivirine, a novel healthcare provider–administered injectable antiretroviral therapy regimen, in diverse US healthcare settings. Findings from staff‐study participants (SSPs) through 12 months of implementation are reported. Methods: CUSTOMIZE was a phase IIIb, 12‐month, single‐arm, hybrid III implementation‐effectiveness study conducted from July 2019 to October 2020 at eight US clinics of five clinic types: private practice (n = 2), federally qualified health centre (n = 2), university (n = 2), AIDS Healthcare Foundation (n = 2) and health maintenance organization (n = 1). Eligible patient participants received monthly cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA injections after a 1‐month oral lead‐in. At baseline, month 4 and month 12, SSPs (n = 3 each per clinic), including physicians, nurses or injectors, and administrators, completed quantitative surveys and semi‐structured interviews to assess implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of intervention measures), programme sustainability and SSP perceptions of, attitudes towards, and expectations for cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA. Month 12 data collection occurred during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Results: In surveys, SSPs reported high mean total scores for acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA implementation at baseline (4.43, 4.52 and 4.38 of 5, respectively) and month 12 (4.45, 4.61 and 4.46 of 5, respectively), regardless of clinic type. At month 12, SSPs were positive about the implementation sustainability (mean Program Sustainability Assessment Tool score, 5.83 out of 7). At baseline, SSPs’ top concern was patients’ ability to maintain monthly appointments (81%); at month 12, 39% had this concern. The proportion of SSPs reporting patient injection pain or soreness as a barrier was consistent at month 12 versus baseline (48% vs. 46%). Most (78%) SSPs reported optimal implementation of cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA in their clinics was achieved in 1–3 months. In interviews, SSP‐reported strategies for successful implementation included teamwork, using a web‐based treatment planner and having a designated person to track appointment scheduling. In month 12 interviews, SSP‐reported structural changes needed for implementation included changing clinic hours and purchasing refrigerators. Conclusions: In CUSTOMIZE, cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA was successfully implemented across a range of US healthcare settings. Barriers were mitigated with minor process adjustments., INTRODUCTION The first complete long‐acting (LA) injectable regimen of cabotegravir and rilpivirine is recommended by treatment guidelines for the maintenance of virologic suppression in people living with HIV‐1 (PLHIV) [1, [...]

Introduction: Switch to Stribild (STB) was non‐inferior to continuation of a non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (FTC/TDF) at week 48 in virologically suppressed HIV adults [1]. We report the Week 48 efficacy and safety of STB versus nevirapine (NVP) or rilpivirine (RPV) with FTC/TDF in suppressed subjects. Materials and Methods: Virologically suppressed subjects on an NNRTI with FTC/TDF regimens for ≥6 months were randomized (2:1) to switch to STB versus continue their NNRTI regimen. Eligibility criteria included no documented resistance to FTC and TDF, no history of virologic failure and eGFR ≥70 mL/min. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects in the modified ITT population who maintained HIV‐1 RNA Results: The mITT population included 433 subjects who were randomized and treated. In the non‐EFV NNRTI subgroup, 59 switched to STB; 37 continued a non‐EFV NNRTI (27 NVP, 10 RPV) with FTC/TDF. At week 48, 97% STB versus 95% non‐EFV NNRTI maintained HIV‐1 RNA Conclusions: In this small group of virologically suppressed subjects, switch to STB vs continuation of NVP or RPV with FTC/TDF was safe, well‐tolerated, and associated with a high rate of virologic suppression at week 48. There was more treatment ease with STB use., Reference Pozniak A, Markowitz M, Mills A, Stellbrink HJ, Antela A, Domingo P, et al. Switching to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus continuation of non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [...]