Search

Background: The ESE-ENSAT guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) suggest adjuvant mitotane for patients at high risk of recurrence following radical surgery. This indication has a limited evidence base, lacking results from randomized controlled trials. No suggestion for or against adjuvant mitotane in low-risk patients was given, since studies did not stratify patients for prognosis. The randomized controlled study ADIUVO compared the efficacy of adjuvant mitotane treatment vs. observation in prolonging recurrence-free survival (RFS) in ACC patients at low-intermediate risk of recurrence. Methods: The main inclusion criteria were: stage I-III ACC, R0 surgery, and Ki-67 ≤10%. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to adjuvant mitotane (MIT) or observation (OBS). The primary endpoint of the study was RFS. Patients who refused randomization were offered inclusion in the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study. In this prospective, observational study, patients were managed as in the ADIUVO study. A total of 91 patients were enrolled in ADIUVO, 45 in the MIT and 46 in the OBS arm. Baseline characteristics of patients were perfectly matched between the 2 arms: median age, 51 vs. 50.5 years; female, 73% vs. 67%; stage I, 20% vs. 26%; stage II, 67% vs. 63%, stage III, 13% vs. 11%; ACC secretion 44% vs. 36%; Weiss 5 vs. 5; respectively. In ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL, 42 patients were treated with mitotane and 53 were untreated. Baseline characteristics of patients were matched between the 2 groups and with MIT and OBS groups in ADIUVO. Thus, the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL cohorts could be analyzed in parallel to those of ADIUVO. Results: In the ADIUVO study, recurrences were 8 in the MIT and 11 in the OBS arm, while deaths were 2 and 5, respectively. RFS and overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between the 2 arms. Tumor size was a predictor of RFS in multivariable analysis. In the OBS arm, the HR for recurrence was 1.321 (95%CI, 0.55–3.32, p=0.54) and HR for death 2.171 (95%CI, 0.52–12.12, p=0.29). The survival analysis in the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study confirmed the findings of ADIUVO. Given the outcome of both studies, the NNT is 55. Conclusions: ACC patients at low-intermediate risk of recurrence after surgery are a minority; however, they show a far better prognosis than expected (5-year RFS is about 75%) and do not benefit significantly from adjuvant mitotane. The results of the ADIUVO study do not support routine use of adjuvant mitotane in this subset of patients, who may thus avoid a potentially toxic treatment. This is an important step toward personalization of ACC care.

Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has an aggressive but heterogeneous behaviour. ENSAT stage and Ki67 proliferation index are used to predict clinical outcome but are limited in distinguishing patients with different risk of disease progress. We aimed to validate the prognostic role of a previously proposed points-based score (mGRAS) in a large ACC cohort. Methods: We included ACC patients who underwent adrenalectomy between 2010 and 2019, had complete clinical and histopathological data, and did not participate in our previous studies (Libe et al. Ann Oncol 2015; Lippert et al. JCEM 2018). The mGRAS score was calculated as follows: age ( Results: A total of 942 ACC patients from 14 ENSAT centres were included (38% men; median age 50yrs (interquartile range 38, 61)). The four mGRAS groups showed superior prognostic discrimination compared to the individual clinical and histological parameters for both PFS and DSS (C-index 0.71, R2D=0.30 and 0.77, R2D=0.46, respectively); ENSAT staging was the second best discriminator (C-index 0.67, R2D 0.21 and 0.72, R2D=0.35, respectively). An even better prognostic discrimination was observed using the ten mGRAS scores individually (C-index 0.73, R2D=0.30, and 0.79, R2D=0.45 for PFS and DSS, respectively). The superiority of mGRAS was confirmed when separately considering patients treated or untreated with adjuvant mitotane (n=481 vs 314). In mitotane-treated patients, the four mGRAS groups showed better performance in predicting PFS than Ki67 index (C-index 0.66, R2D 0.18 vs C-index 0.62, R2D 0.12). Conclusion: The prognostic performance of mGRAS is superior to that of ENSAT staging and Ki67. This simple score may guide personalised treatment decisions in patients with ACC, e.g. regarding the need for adjuvant therapy and frequency of monitoring.

Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare disease with often poor prognosis. Previous research has shown that surgery in a Dutch Adrenal Network (DAN) center increases the chance of survival. We aim to explore the determinants and survival of patients with ACC recently treated in the Netherlands both within and outside DAN centers. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively collected data from 172 adult patients with newly diagnosed ACC and 97 patients with recurrence or new metastases, registered between 2014 and 2019 in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Differences in survival were analyzed with cox-regression analysis. Results: More than half of the new cases presented with advance disease (25.7% stage III, 34.6% stage IV) and the median survival was 29 months. The majority of treatments occurred within a DAN center (87.2% of surgery, compared to 56.4% between 1999 and 2009; and 94.5% of medical treatment). There were no differences in patient characteristics between the centers apart from a relatively high number of patients with stage IV disease outside DAN centers (47.2% vs. 28.7%). Adrenal resection and mitotane therapy both resulted in a significant survival benefit (resection HR 0.29, CI95%[0.17–0.49]; mitotane HR 0.61, CI95%[0.37–0.99], corrected for stage). Still, a remarkable proportion of patients with advanced disease received no mitotane treatment (39.8%). Due to the small number of patients treated outside DAN centers, survival benefits could not be tested. Conclusions: Centralization of ACC care in the Netherlands has improved since the previous report, but a further improvement in centralization of surgery can be made. Adrenal resection and mitotane treatment remain the main form of treatment, with a clear survival benefit. Further research is necessary to determine why mitotane treatment is withheld in a large proportion of patients with advance disease.