Search

A pneumatic spray delivery-based solid set canopy delivery system (PSD-SSCDS) has been successfully configured for efficient spray applications in modern apple orchards typical of the state of Washington state. This study investigates the spray performance of optimized PSD-SSCDS against an axial-fan airblast sprayer in terms of spray deposition, coverage, and off-target drift in a tall spindle architecture of a commercial apple orchard. For field evaluation, mylar cards and water sensitive paper samplers were placed in different canopy zones on either side of the leaf surface, and 500 ppm of biodegradable fluorescent tracer solution was sprayed with PSD-SSCDS and an airblast sprayer. Additionally, aerial and downwind samplers were installed to evaluate ground runoff and drift, as well as aerial drift. The spray deposited on the mylar cards was analyzed using fluorometry, and spray coverage on WSPs was evaluated using image processing techniques. PSD-SSCDS (645.0 ± 94.7 ng cm-2, mean ± standard error) and an airblast sprayer treatment (661.6 ± 26.9 ng cm-2) had comparable mean spray deposition with no significant difference in different canopy zones for both treatments. However, the spray coverage was significantly higher for the airblast sprayer (32.7 ± 2.4%) compared to PSD-SSCDS (22.5 ± 3.1%). These differences are likely due to air-assist in airblast spraying, which is absent in PSD-SSCDS. Evidently, the airblast sprayer had significantly higher losses to the ground and aerial drift compared to PSD-SSCDS, as the ground drift for the latter was mostly confined within 4.1 m downwind of the sprayed row and spray losses to air were minimal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to review representative publications for improved knowledge of spraying dense field crop canopies to augment the current understanding of the interaction between target foliage characteristics, spray practices, and the environment. Emphasis was placed on measured deep-canopy spray deposits made by full-scale sprayers and studies of airflow within and around crop canopies. Airflow could act as a spray droplet carrier and/or indicator of the internal canopy structure that restricts droplet penetration. High variation in natural airflows was noted in several studies. Crop canopy descriptions for spray studies were generally limited to overall canopy/row dimensions, descriptions of individual plant structures, leaf shapes, and leaf area index. Few studies evaluated the internal canopy "openness" with characteristic shape and size of internal volumes that would accommodate spray droplet trajectories. There have been significant increases in available spray tip designs with multiple orifices, discharge configurations, and droplet sizes that offered the applicator many choices. Advanced sprayer technologies ranging from nozzle control to sensor navigation are available, provided that suitable algorithms can be developed in a timely manner that pertain to a wide variety of spray and crop conditions. The air-assist technique provides a dynamic alternative to traditional over-the-top sprays for increasing spray penetration and deposit, advocating that the specifics of air discharge, spray droplet sizes, and canopy structure can be integrated. The complexity of the spraying process needs an extensive collaborative effort of many stakeholders to develop solutions for sprays to penetrate foliage that is subject to diseases and pests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to review representative publications for improved knowledge of spraying dense field crop canopies to augment the current understanding of the interaction between target foliage characteristics, spray practices, and the environment. Emphasis was placed on measured deep-canopy spray deposits made by full-scale sprayers and studies of airflow within and around crop canopies. Airflow could act as a spray droplet carrier and/or indicator of the internal canopy structure that restricts droplet penetration. High variation in natural airflows was noted in several studies. Crop canopy descriptions for spray studies were generally limited to overall canopy/row dimensions, descriptions of individual plant structures, leaf shapes, and leaf area index. Few studies evaluated the internal canopy "openness" with characteristic shape and size of internal volumes that would accommodate spray droplet trajectories. There have been significant increases in available spray tip designs with multiple orifices, discharge configurations, and droplet sizes that offered the applicator many choices. Advanced sprayer technologies ranging from nozzle control to sensor navigation are available, provided that suitable algorithms can be developed in a timely manner that pertain to a wide variety of spray and crop conditions. The air-assist technique provides a dynamic alternative to traditional over-the-top sprays for increasing spray penetration and deposit, advocating that the specifics of air discharge, spray droplet sizes, and canopy structure can be integrated. The complexity of the spraying process needs an extensive collaborative effort of many stakeholders to develop solutions for sprays to penetrate foliage that is subject to diseases and pests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]