Search

Objectives: To clarify the safety and efficacy of celecoxib combined with chemoradiotherapy using S-1 for lower rectal cancer. Methods: Twenty-one patients with pathologically proven lower rectal adenocarcinoma (cT3-T4, Tx N+, M0) were included in this study. A total dose of 45 Gy was administered in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy. Celecoxib was given orally twice daily with S-1 on the day of irradiation. The dose of celecoxib was set at 400 mg/day. In Phase I, the S-1 dose was started at 80 mg/m2/day; in Phase II, S-1 was administered in the same dose as Phase I. Patients underwent surgery six to eight weeks after completing chemoradiotherapy, followed by six months of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The S-1 recommended dose was 80 mg/m2/day. The pathological complete remission rate was 15.8%, the rate of protocol completion was 14.3%, and the rate of adverse events exceeding Grade 3 was 19.0%. Surgery was performed in 19 cases, with a sphincter-sparing rate of 31.6%. Postoperative complications exceeding Grade 3 occurred in 52.4% of cases. The three year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were 89.3% and 67.0%, respectively. Conclusions: We failed to show a synergistic or additive therapeutic effect of preoperative CRT using S-1, combined with celecoxib, for lower advanced rectal cancer beyond CRT using 5 FU or capecitabine alone. The incidence of complications, evidently involving intestinal ischemia, was relatively high. This treatment strategy is not recommended at present.

There are several reports on the usefulness of diverting ileostomy for decreasing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and the severity of pelvic peritonitis. However, a number of complications induced by ileostomy itself have also been reported, including a special condition induced by obstruction at the outlet of the stoma known as “outlet obstruction.” In this study, we examined the frequency and risk factors of this complication based on the data of ileostomy cases in our institution. Methods: One hundred and seven patients who received ileostomy creation at our department from January 2010 to December 2015 were included. The incidence of outlet obstruction and risk factors were analyzed. Results: Outlet obstruction occurred in 18 cases (16.8%). The incidence was significantly higher in total colectomy or proctocolectomy cases as well as in those with left side construction and laparoscopic surgery than in other patients in a univariate analysis. However, in a multivariate analysis, no risk factors were extracted. Conclusions: To determine the true cause of this disease, a prospective study with a large number of cases is needed. Since multiple terms are used for this condition, resulting in confusion, a consensus on the appropriate terms is also important.