Search

Osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated in people living in Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), even though aged-care residents are at greater risk of experiencing fractures than their community-dwelling counterparts. The first (2009) and second (2016) Consensus Conferences on the Treatment of Osteoporosis in RACFs in Australia addressed the prevention of falls and fractures in RACFs. A third Consensus Conference was held to review advances in the field of osteoporosis for people living in RACFs and to update current guidelines. The Conference was held virtually in October 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Attendance at the meeting was open to health practitioners (n = 116) (eg, general practitioners, geriatricians, rehabilitation specialists, endocrinologists, pharmacists, and physiotherapists) working in RACFs. Participants chose and/or were assigned to breakout groups to review the evidence and reach a consensus on the topic area assigned to the group, which was then presented to the entire group by a nominated spokesperson. Recommendations developed by breakout groups were discussed and voted on by all attending participants. This article updates the evidence for preventing falls and fractures and managing osteoporosis in older adults living in RACFs based on agreed outcomes from the group. We anticipate these updated recommendations will provide health practitioners with valuable guidance when practicing in RACFs.

Objectives Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) provides cut-points based on muscle weakness (low grip strength) and slowness (poor gait speed) for low-risk populations; however, it is unknown if these criteria apply to high-risk populations. We examined the association between SDOC criteria and important health status indicators in high-risk older persons. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting and Participants 356 community-dwelling older persons (median age: 79 years, interquartile range: 73, 83; 75.2% women) attending a falls and fractures clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Methods Grip strength (hydraulic dynamometer) and gait speed (over 4 m) were used to define sarcopenia using SDOC cut-points. Health measures included falls (past 1 year) and fractures (past 5 years) by self-report, and malnutrition, depression, balance confidence, fear of falling, static balance (limits of stability), dynamic balance (Four-Square Step Test), and body composition [body mass index and lean mass, fat mass, and bone density (via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry)] were assessed using validated procedures. Fasting vitamin D and parathyroid hormone concentrations were measured by immunoassays. Participants were categorized as nonsarcopenic or sarcopenic based on the SDOC cut-points, and multivariate models were used to examine the association between sarcopenia and health status indicators while adjusting for confounding factors. Results After adjusting for covariates, sarcopenic older persons (n = 162, 45.5%) were positively associated with malnutrition [odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63, 6.32], depression (OR 4.11, 95% CI 2.31, 7.29), fear of falling (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06, 1.10) as well as recurrent (2 or more) falls (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.01, 2.59) and fractures (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.17, 4.36), and negatively associated with poor balance confidence (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95, 0.97) (P Conclusions and Implications SDOC criteria are strongly associated with important health status indicators in high-risk older persons, which strengthens the clinical utility of the SDOC in these populations.

We sought to examine the associations of osteosarcopenia with physical performance, balance, and falls and fractures in community-dwelling older adults. Additionally, we aimed to determine which clinical outcomes are associated with specific components of osteosarcopenia.Cross-sectional study.253 participants (77% women; aged 77.9 ± 0.42 years) who presented for a falls and fractures risk assessment in Melbourne, Australia.Participants were mobile, community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) free of cognitive impairment. Body composition (via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), physical performance [via Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)], and balance [via Four-Square Step test (FSS) and posturography] were examined. Falls in the past year and fractures in the past 5 years were self-reported. Osteosarcopenia was defined as (1) low bone mineral density (BMD) [T score-1 standard deviation (SD)] combined with sarcopenia and (2) osteoporosis (BMD T score ≤-2.5 SD) combined with severe sarcopenia. For sarcopenia, we employed the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP1), the revised criteria (EWGSOP2), and that of the Foundation for the National Institutes for Health (FNIH). Kruskal-Wallis and logistic regression tests were used for statistical analysis.Osteosarcopenia was associated with worse SPPB, TUG, FSS, limit of stability, and falls and fractures history. Additionally, osteosarcopenia (using the severe sarcopenia classification) conferred an increased rate of falls [odds ratios (ORs) from 2.83 to 3.63; P .05 for all] and fractures (ORs from 3.86 to 4.38; P .05 for all) when employing the EWGSOP2 and FNIH definitions, respectively.Compared with the nonosteosarcopenic group, those with osteosarcopenia had greater impairment of physical performance and balance. The EWGSOP2 and FNIH criteria resulted in the strongest associations with physical performance and self-reported falls and fractures.