Search

To assess the internal and external validity of a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) evaluating a decision tool with supportive interventions for the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing homes (NHs), and to identify facilitators and barriers in implementing this antibiotic stewardship intervention. Mixed-methods process evaluation study. Physicians, nursing staff, client council members, and residents of Dutch NHs. We used cRCT data of the ANNA study (Antibiotic Prescribing and Non-prescribing in Nursing Home Residents With Signs and Symptoms Ascribed to Urinary Tract Infection). In addition, we sent out an online evaluation questionnaire, conducted semistructured interviews with physicians and nursing staff, and consulted client council members. Internal validity was lowered: control group physicians participated in several non–study-related activities regarding UTI. External validity was good: almost all intervention components had a high fidelity (52%-74%) and were perceived as relevant (physicians: 7.2-8.6 of 10, nursing staff: 6.5-8.5 of 10) and feasible (physicians: 7.5 of 10, nursing staff 6.4 of 10), with feasibility for residents with dementia and urine incontinence needing attention. The most common reason for deviating from the advice generated by the decision tool was an unclear illness presentation. Identified facilitators to implementation were confidence in the intervention, repeated intervention encounter, and having "champions" in the NH. Barriers were limited involvement of nursing staff, unstable nursing teams, residents' and representatives' belief that antibiotics should be prescribed, and a low antibiotic prescribing threshold within the NH culture. Lowered internal validity may have reduced the study effect. Attention should be paid to the feasibility of the intervention in residents with dementia and urinary incontinence. Improvement opportunities for implementation were higher nursing staff involvement and repeated intervention offering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Burdensome symptoms frequently develop as part of the dementia trajectory and influence quality of life. We explore the course of symptoms and their treatment during nursing home stay to help target adequate symptom management. Design Data were collected as part of the Dutch End of Life in Dementia study, a longitudinal observational study with up to 3.5 years of follow-up. Physicians performed assessments at baseline, semiannually, and shortly after death of pain, agitation, shortness of breath, and treatment provided for these symptoms. Setting Long-term care facilities (28) in the Netherlands. Participants Newly admitted nursing home residents (372) in variable stages of dementia. Measurements We described prevalence and course of symptoms, and treatment provided for these symptoms. We used generalized estimating equations to evaluate the longitudinal change in symptoms and their treatment, and the associations between the symptoms of pain and agitation, as well as between stage of dementia and symptoms. Results Pain was common (varying from 47% to 68% across the semiannual assessments) and frequently persistent (36%–41% of all residents); it increased to 78% in the last week of life. Agitation was the most common symptom (57%–71%), and also frequently persistent (39%–53%), yet it decreased to 35% in the last week of life. Shortness of breath was less common (16%–26%), but it increased to 52% at the end of life. Pain was not significantly associated with agitation. Advanced dementia was associated with more pain only. Treatment changed in particular at the end of life. Pain was treated mostly with acetaminophen (34%–52%), and at the end of life with parenteral opioids (44%). Agitation was mostly treated nonpharmacologically (78%–92%), and at the end of life anxiolytics were the most frequently prescribed treatment (62%). Overall, aerosolized bronchodilators were the most frequently prescribed treatment for shortness of breath (29%–67%), but at the end of life, this was morphine (69%). Conclusion Pain and agitation were common and frequently persisted in residents with dementia during nursing home stay, but symptom management intensified only at the end of life. Symptom control may be suboptimal from admission, and a stronger focus on symptom control is needed at an earlier stage than the end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: To determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistance and multiresistance of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in nursing homes and to determine which factors are associated with this prevalence. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Nursing homes. Participants: Residents of long-stay somatic care wards and rehabilitation patients were recruited from five nursing homes and two rehabilitation wards in hospitals in the central region of the Netherlands. Measurements: From each included patient, an anal swab was analyzed for E. coli and its antibiotic susceptibility and extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Nasal swabs were analyzed for S. aureus and its susceptibility, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Associations were determined between resistance of E. coli to amoxicillin/co-amoxiclav and recent use (previous 6 months) of these antibiotics, hospital admission (previous 3 months), and presence of a urinary catheter. Results: A total of 125 patients were included in the study. The resistance and intermediate susceptibility of E. coli varied from 4% (ceftriaxone) to 43% (amoxicillin). Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae were found in 6% of the patients. Amoxicillin and/or co-amoxiclav users were significantly more resistant to these antibiotics (69%) than nonusers (38%). No associations were found between amoxicillin and/or co-amoxiclav resistance and hospital admission or presence of a urine catheter. The resistance of S. aureus varied from 0% to 69% (penicillin). No MRSA was found. The ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli and S. aureus was 14% and 39%, respectively. Conclusion: The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli and S. aureus in nursing homes was considerably high in this study, although no MRSA was found. This may lead to failing of empiric therapy of infections in patients in nursing homes. In particular, the high resistance to ciprofloxacin may make empiric quinolone therapy unreliable. Antibiotic use was associated with antibiotic resistance of E. coli. Therefore, antibiotic use should be restricted as much as possible. Analysis of risk factors for antibiotic resistance should be extended to be able to prevent further development of antibiotic resistance in nursing homes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives Physician treatment orders (PTOs) prevent burdensome unnecessary medical treatment of frail nursing home patients. The aim was to determine the prevalence of PTOs and time duration between nursing home admittance and PTO completion. Design Population-based, retrospective cohort study. Setting Nursing homes across the Netherlands. Data Collection Digital medical records of patients who subsequently were submitted to 14 Dutch nursing homes across The Netherlands were studied between 2010 and 2013. The prevalence's of do-resuscitate, do-not-resuscitate, life-sustaining, and palliative care PTOs and the time intervals between nursing home admittance and documentation of PTOs were measured. Information regarding demographic patient characteristics, type of nursing home ward, and mention of a discussion of PTOs with the patient or caregivers was obtained. Results Eighty-two percent of the nursing home patients received a PTO regarding resuscitation, life-sustaining, or palliative care treatment. Twenty-four percent of the patients received a do-resuscitation PTO, 55% received a do-not-resuscitate PTO, 44% a life-sustaining PTO, and 16% a palliative care PTO. The median duration between nursing home admittance and documentation of the first PTO was 1 day. Most nursing home patients had PTOs within 1 week after admittance. Conclusion A minority (18%) of Dutch nursing home patients has no documented PTOs during their nursing home stay, which could have negative effects on end-of-life care of nursing home residents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: The Grip on Challenging Behavior care program was developed using the current guidelines and models on managing challenging behavior in dementia in nursing homes. It was hypothesized that the use of the care program would lead to a decrease in challenging behavior and in the prescription of psychoactive drugs without increase in use of restraints. Design: A randomized controlled trial was undertaken using a stepped-wedge design to implement the care program and to evaluate the effects. An assessment of challenging behavior and psychoactive medication was undertaken every 4 months on all participating units followed by the introduction of the care program in a group of 3 to 4 units. A total of 6 time assessments took place over 20 months. Setting: Seventeen dementia special care units of different nursing homes. Participants: A total of 659 residents of dementia special care units. All residents with dementia on the unit were included. Units were assigned by random allocation software to 1 of 5 groups with different starting points for the implementation of the care program. Intervention: A care program consisting of various assessment procedures and tools, which ensure a multidisciplinary approach and which structure the process of managing challenging behavior in dementia. Measurements: Challenging behavior was measured using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Research assistants (blinded for intervention status of the unit) interviewed nurses on the units about challenging behavior. Data on psychoactive drugs and restraints were retrieved from resident charts. Results: A total of 2292 assessments took place involving 659 residents (1126 control measurements, 1166 intervention measurements). The group of residents who remained in the intervention condition compared with the group in the control condition differed significantly in the CMAI change scores between successive assessments [–2.4 CMAI points, 95% confidence interval (CI) –4.3 to –0.6]. No significant effects were found for the control-to-intervention group compared with the group who remained in the control group (0.0 CMAI points, 95% CI –2.3 to 2.4). Significant effects were found on 5 of the 12 Neuropsychiatric Inventory items and on the use of antipsychotics (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37– 0.80) and antidepressants (odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.44–0.94). No effect on use of restraints was observed. Conclusions: The Grip on Challenging behavior program was able to diminish some forms of challenging behavior and the use of psychoactive drugs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Most quality indicators (QIs) currently used in nursing homes reflect the care delivered by the entire multidisciplinary team and are not specific for medical practitioners. International experts have proposed a set of QIs that specifically reflect the quality of medical care in nursing homes. The objective of the Delphi study described here was to compile a set of actionable QIs tailored for medical practitioners working within Dutch nursing homes. This was achieved through the evaluation of 15 existing national QIs and 35 international QIs by a panel of medical practitioners, comprising medical specialists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, who are working in Dutch nursing homes. Panelists rated each QI on (1) level of direct control by medical practitioners and (2) its relevance to the quality of medical care. QIs progressing to subsequent rounds required panel agreement on both direct control (≥70% ≥3 points on a 4-point scale) and relevance (≥70% ≥8 on a 10-point scale). In the last round, each panelist selected the 5 most relevant QIs and arranged them in order of importance. These top 5 rankings were converted into points for an overall final ranking. There was consensus on 42 QIs being under the control of medical practitioners, and 21 of these QIs were considered relevant for quality of care. Most of the 21 QIs originated from the international QI set. This finding supports the transferability of the internationally developed QIs to the Dutch nursing home context and provides opportunities to compare the quality of medical care in nursing homes across countries. In the final ranking, the QI related to new medication prescriptions received the highest rating, followed by 3 QIs related to advance care planning. Future research should focus on evaluating the feasibility of measuring the selected QIs and assessing their measurement properties before implementing them in professional learning and quality improvement initiatives for medical practitioners in nursing homes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to explore the effects of the Dutch COVID-19 lockdown (March 20–May 25, 2020) on mood, behavior, and social and cognitive functioning of older residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) prospectively. Mixed methods: historically controlled longitudinal cohort study and focus groups. Residents of Dutch LTCFs. Residents who were assessed during and prior to the lockdown were compared to residents of the same wards with 2 assessments prior to the lockdown. We used mixed models and generalized estimating equation analyses to explore differences in changes in mood, withdrawal and aggressive behavior, loneliness and conflict, and cognition and delirium. We also explored whether the effect of the lockdown differed for different subgroups. In 2 online focus groups, LTCF care professionals, ranging from care staff to physicians, reflected on their experiences of the effect of the lockdown and the cohort study results. The lockdown group of 298 residents was compared to the control group of 625 residents. Self-reported mood symptoms showed a slightly greater increase during the lockdown. During the first half of the lockdown, the level of conflict with other residents decreased whereas it increased in the control group. The subgroup with moderate-severe cognitive impairment showed a decrease in withdrawal during the lockdown, whereas the group with no-mild cognitive impairment showed a statistically nonsignificant relative increase. Professionals described great individual variation in the effects of the lockdown on residents. Facilities attempted to preserve the experienced positive effects, for example, by promoting tranquility in shared rooms and continuing to organize individualized ward-based activities. We did not find clinically relevant negative effects of the lockdown on mood, behavior, and social and cognitive functioning in older residents of LTCFs at the group level. Possibly, staff mitigated the negative effects at the group level. Meanwhile, they learned lessons that they continue to apply to enhance resident well-being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: In view of the development of an integrated care and treatment program for institutionalized stroke patients tailored to their needs, we aimed to explore their status of functioning in the physical, cognitive, emotional, communicative and social domains. In addition, we explored the relation between status of functioning and stroke characteristics. Design: A cross-sectional, observational study. Setting: Dutch nursing homes (NHs). Participants: Residents with stroke as main diagnosis for NH-admission, who experienced a stroke ≥3 months ago and stayed ≥1 month in a long term care ward. Measurements: Attending physicians provided information about stroke subtype, stroke location and time post-stroke. Status of functioning was measured through an observation list comprising the Barthel Index, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire, and sections of the Resident Assessment Instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities. The list was filled out in a structured interview with a qualified nurse assistant who knew the resident well. Results: We included 274 residents (mean age 76.6, 58.4% female). The stroke that caused NH-dependency was in 81.3% ischemic, and in 49.8% right-sided. Median time post-stroke was 47 months; 90.9% of the residents were severely dependent in basic activities of daily living and 58% were in pain. Nearly half of the residents showed moderate (24.4%) or severe (23%) cognitive impairment. Irritability (52.9%), depressive symptoms (52.6%) and apathy (34.3%) occurred as the most frequent neuropsychiatric symptoms; 27.7% had a poor ability to express themselves and 30.3% had a low social engagement. We found more severe cognitive impairment, agitation/aggression and poor expression in left-sided strokes, more nighttime behavioral disturbances and delusions in right-sided strokes, and lower social engagement in residents with the largest time-interval post-stroke. Conclusion: This study among institutionalized stroke patients in Dutch NHs revealed very high prevalence of impairments on all domains of functioning, above the well-known severe disabilities in basic activities of daily living. The monitoring and management of both pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms should be key elements in an integrated care and treatment program. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To compare the Neuropsychiatric Inventory apathy subscale (NPIa) with the abbreviated Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-10) on discriminant validity and on their performance to distinguish residents as apathetic or nonapathetic. Design: Cross-sectional design. Setting: Nursing home. Participants: 100 residents of 4 dementia special care units (n = 58) and 3 somatic units (n = 42). Measurements: Primary professional caregivers were interviewed to score the AES-10 and NPIa. The elderly care physician and the psychologist of each unit examined residents for clinical apathy using diagnostic criteria. Results: The AES-10 and NPIa correlated moderately with each other (rs  = 0.62, P < .0001). The AES-10 correlated weakly (rs  = 0.27, P = .024) and the NPIa moderately (rs  = 0.46, P = .001) with the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (P < .01) for AES-10 and 0.67 (P < .05) for NPIa. The AES-10 produced higher sums of sensitivity and negative predictive value than the NPIa. Explorative analyses revealed that both instruments produced higher scores in dementia independently of having an apathy diagnosis, whereas AUCs were significant in nondementia (AES-10: AUC = 0.88, P < .001; NPIa: AUC = 0.77, P = .023), but not in dementia. Conclusion: Both the AES-10 and NPIa may be used to distinguish apathetic from nonapathetic residents in a heterogeneous sample with and without dementia, or in residents without dementia. The AES-10 may be preferable to the NPIa apathy subscale when ruling out or screening for apathy. The performance of the scales against diagnostic criteria of apathy in dementia need to be further examined. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To describe the symptomatology, mortality, and risk factors for mortality in a large group of Dutch nursing home (NH) residents with clinically suspected COVID-19 who were tested with a reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Prospective cohort study. Residents of Dutch NHs with clinically suspected COVID-19 and who received RT-PCR test. We collected data of NH residents with clinically suspected COVID-19 via electronic health records between March 18 and May 13, 2020. Registration was performed on diagnostic status [confirmed (COVID-19+)/ruled out (COVID-19–)] and symptomatology (typical and atypical symptoms). Information on mortality and risk factors for mortality were extracted from usual care data. In our sample of residents with clinically suspected COVID-19 (N = 4007), COVID-19 was confirmed in 1538 residents (38%). Although symptomatology overlapped between residents with COVID-19+ and COVID-19–, those with COVID-19+ were 3 times more likely to die within 30 days [hazard ratio (HR), 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-3.6]. Within this group, mortality was higher for men than for women (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.2), and we observed a higher mortality for residents with dementia, reduced kidney function, and Parkinson's disease, even when corrected for age, gender, and comorbidities. About 40% of the residents with clinically suspected COVID-19 actually had COVID-19, based on the RT-PCR test. Despite an overlap in symptomatology, mortality rate was 3 times higher for residents with COVID-19+. This emphasizes the importance of using low-threshold testing in NH residents, which is an essential prerequisite to using limited personal protective equipment and isolation measures efficiently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]