Search

To measure changes in resident-level acute care transfer rates after the PoET Southwest Spread Project (PSSP), and to identify patient and long-term care (LTC) home characteristics associated with acute care transfers after program launch. Quasi-experimental matched (1:1 ratio) cohort study design using linked population-based health administrative data. Sixty publicly funded LTC homes (PSSP = 30; control = 30) in Ontario, Canada, from November 2019 to December 2021. We matched 30 PSSP homes to 30 control homes with similar characteristics and described incidence rates for resident-level acute care transfers during the 7-month post-implementation period. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate the association between PSSP implementation and acute care transfers during the post-implementation period. We adjusted resident-level characteristics (ie, age, sex, comorbidity status) and home-level characteristics (ie, rurality status, profit model, COVID-19 impact). We identified a decedent sub-cohort to measure transfer patterns during the last 2 months of life. A matched cohort of 8894 residents (PSSP = 4103; control = 4791) was captured. Incidence rates of transfers increased during the post-implementation period for both PSSP (78.8 to 80.9 transfers per 1000 person-months) and control residents (66.9 to 67.9 transfers per 1000 person-months). After adjusting for covariates of interest, PSSP exposure was associated with a reduction in acute care transfers during the post-implementation period after adjusting for covariates (incidence rate ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62–0.87; P =.0002). Older age and select health regions were associated with reduced transfers, whereas higher comorbidity status and higher COVID-19 outbreak days were associated with increases. Similar patterns persisted for transfers during the last 2 months of life. This study systematically evaluated the impact of an ethics-based health care intervention in LTC using health care utilization databases. PoET implementation is associated with reduced acute care transfer rates, especially in the last 2 months of life in LTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advance care planning (ACP) within nursing homes (NHs) is an integral component of resident-centered care yet remains an ongoing area for improvement. This study explored health care providers' experiences when facilitating ACP discussions with residents and their families. Interpretive description was used to explore meanings and generate knowledge that is applicable for clinical contexts. A purposive sample of 27 staff members (2 directors of care, 3 assistant directors of care, 1 nurse practitioner, 11 registered nurses, 3 registered practical nurses, and 7 social workers) from 29 NHs located across 3 Canadian provinces that participated in cluster-randomized intervention study to improve ACP. Semistructured interviews were conducted between January and July 2020. Interpretive description methods were used for analysis. Three themes were identified. "Navigating Relational Tensions During ACP with Families" captures the relational tensions that participants experienced while navigating ACP processes with residents and their families. The second theme, "Where's the Doctor?" highlights the general lack of physician involvement in ACP discussions and the subsequent pressures faced by participants when supporting residents and families. The last theme, "Crises Change the Best Laid Plans," illustrates the challenges participants face when trying to adhere to existing care plans during residents' medical crises. Participants' experiences indicate that current ACP processes in NHs do not meet the needs of residents, families, or care teams. Additional support from physicians and changes to structural processes are needed to support resident-centered end-of-life planning within this care context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe professional and personal experiences of nursing home care leaders during early waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative interpretive description. Eight sites across 2 Canadian provinces. Sites varied by COVID-19 status (low or high), size (<120 or ≥120 beds), and ownership model (for-profit or not-for-profit). We recruited 21 leaders as participants: 14 managers and 7 directors of care. Remote Zoom-assisted semi-structured interviews conducted from January to April 2021. Concurrent data generation and inductive content analysis occurred throughout. Sampling ceased once we reached sufficient analytic variation and richness to answer research questions. Most participants were female, ≥50 years of age, and born in Canada. We found 4 major themes. (1) Responsibility to protect: Extreme precautions were employed to protect residents, staff, and leaders' families. Leaders experienced profound distress when COVID-19 infiltrated their care homes. (2) Overwhelming workloads: Changing public health orders and redeployment to pandemic-related activities caused administrative chaos. Leaders worked double shifts to cope with pandemic demands and maintain their usual work. (3) Mental and emotional toll: All participants reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia, leading to ongoing exhaustion. Shifting staff focus from caring to custodial enforcement of isolation caused considerable distress, guilt, and grief. (4) Moving forward: The pandemic spotlighted deficiencies in the nursing home context that lead to inadequate quality of resident care and staff burnout. Some leaders indicated their pandemic experience signaled an unanticipated end to their careers. Nursing home leaders faced mental distress and inordinate workloads during the pandemic. This is an urgent call for systemic change to improve working conditions for leaders and quality of care and quality of life for residents. Nursing home leaders are at increased risk of burnout, which must be addressed to mitigate attrition in the sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Describe the rate of death over 4 consecutive quarters and determine optimal categorization of residents into risk-of-death categories, expanding the Changes in Health, Endstage Disease, Signs and Symptoms (CHESS) scale. Using secondary analysis design with Minimum Data Set (MDS) data, the CHESS scale provided the base upon which the DeathRisk-NH scale was developed. Baseline and 4 quarterly follow-up analyses of Canadian (n = 109,145) and US (n = 1,075,611) nursing home resident data were completed. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of death, additive to CHESS, to form the DeathRisk-NH scale. The independent variable set used MDS items, focusing on clinical complexity indicators, diagnostic conditions, and measures of severe clinical distress. Country cohorts had similar percentages of residents with mean activities of daily living hierarchy scores, dependence in mobility, continence, memory, and overall CHESS scores. The percentage of individuals who died increased from 10.5% (3 months) to 30.7% (12 months). The average annual death rate for this cohort was 5.5 times higher than the national annual death rate of approximately 5.6%. The DeathRisk-NH is an effective prediction model to identify residents at risk of death within the first 12 months after admission to the nursing home. The tool may be helpful in patient care planning, resource allocation, and excess death monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the scale-up of the OPUS-AP program to improve the care of residents at long-term care (LTC) centers through the systematic implementation of resident-centered approaches to care, the application of nonpharmacologic interventions for the management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), and the deprescribing of antipsychotics where these are not clinically indicated. Prospective, closed cohort. Residents with major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) from 24 (phase 1) and 129 (phase 2) publicly funded LTC centers in Quebec, Canada. The primary outcome was antipsychotic deprescribing (cessation or dose reduction). Secondary outcomes included changes in benzodiazepine and antidepressant prescriptions, BPSD, and falls. Comparisons were made between assessments at baseline and after 9 months. OPUS-AP phase 2 was conducted from March to December 2019 in 329 clinical wards at 129 LTC centers. At baseline, the 10,601 included residents had a mean age of 82.9: 64.6% were of female sex, 73.7% had a diagnosis of MNCD, and 47.0% had an antipsychotic prescription. These characteristics were similar to those of the 1054 residents at the 24 LTC centers in phase 1. In phase 2, successful antipsychotic deprescribing was achieved for 77.1% of residents in whom this approach was attempted, compared to 85.5% in phase 1. Phase 1 and 2 showed statistically significant improvements in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score and reduced use of benzodiazepines in residents with successful antipsychotic deprescribing. These improvements were of a smaller magnitude in phase 2. Statistically significant reductions in falls were observed in phase 2. The scale-up of the OPUS-AP program from 24 to 129 LTC centers was successful and resulted in a significant reduction in antipsychotic use, as well as improvement in BPSD, and reductions in benzodiazepine use and falls in residents with successful antipsychotic deprescribing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine changes in the prescribing of end-of-life symptom management medications in long-term care (LTC) homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. We included all individuals who died in LTC homes between January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2021. We separated the study into 2 periods: before COVID-19 (January 1, 2017, to March 17, 2020) and during COVID-19 (March 18, 2020, to March 31, 2021). For each LTC home, we measured the percentage of residents who died before and during COVID-19 who had a subcutaneous symptom management medication prescription in their last 14 days of life. We grouped LTC homes into quintiles based on their mean prescribing rates before COVID-19, and examined changes in prescribing during COVID-19 and COVID-19 outcomes across quintiles. We captured 75,438 LTC residents who died in Ontario's 626 LTC homes during the entire study period, with 19,522 (25.9%) dying during COVID-19. The mean prescribing rate during COVID-19 ranged from 46.9% to 79.4% between the lowest and highest prescribing quintiles. During COVID-19, the mean prescribing rate in the lowest prescribing quintile increased by 9.6% compared to before COVID-19. Compared to LTC homes in the highest prescribing quintile, homes in the lowest prescribing quintile experienced the highest proportion of COVID-19 outbreaks (73.4% vs 50.0%), the largest mean outbreak intensity (0.27 vs 0.09 cases/bed), the highest mean total days with a COVID-19 outbreak (72.7 vs 24.2 days), and the greatest proportion of decedents who were transferred and died outside of LTC (22.1% vs 8.6%). LTC homes in Ontario had wide variations in the prescribing rates of end-of-life symptom management medications before and during COVID-19. Homes in the lower prescribing quintiles had more COVID-19 cases per bed and days spent in an outbreak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assess the impact of a new pharmaceutical care model on (1) polypharmacy and (2) potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Pragmatic quasi-experimental study with a control group. This multifaceted model enables pharmacists and nurses to increase their professional autonomy by enforcing laws designed to expand their scope of practice. It also involves a strategic reorganization of care, interdisciplinary training, and systematic medication reviews. Two LTCFs exposed to the model (409 residents) were compared to 2 control LTCFs (282 residents) in Quebec, Canada. All individuals were aged 65 years or older and residing in included LTCFs. Polypharmacy (≥10 medications) and PIM (2015 Beers criteria) were analyzed throughout 12 months between March 2017 and June 2018. Groups were compared before and after implementation using repeated measures mixed Poisson or logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Over 12 months, for regular medications, polypharmacy decreased from 42% to 20% (exposed group) and from 50% to 41% (control group) [difference in differences (DID): 13%, P <.001]. Mean number of PIMs also decreased from 0.79 to 0.56 (exposed group) and from 1.08 to 0.90 (control group) (DID: 0.05, P =.002). Compared with usual care, this multifaceted model reduced the probability of receiving ≥10 medications and the mean number of PIMs. Greater professional autonomy, reorganization of care, training, and medication review can optimize pharmaceutical care. As the role of pharmacists is expanding in many countries, this model shows what could be achieved with increased professional autonomy of pharmacists and nurses in LTCFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antipsychotic medications are often used for the first-line management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) contrary to guideline recommendations. The Optimizing Practices, Use, Care and Services–Antipsychotics (OPUS-AP) strategy aims to improve the well-being of long-term care (LTC) residents with major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) by implementing a resident-centered approach, nonpharmacologic interventions, and antipsychotic deprescribing in inappropriate indications. Prospective, closed cohort supplemented by a developmental evaluation. Residents of designated wards in 24 LTC centers in Québec, Canada. Provincial guidelines were disseminated, followed by the implementation of an integrated knowledge translation and mobilization strategy, including training, coaching, clinical tools, evaluation of clinical practices, and a change management strategy. Antipsychotic, benzodiazepine, and antidepressant prescriptions; BPSD; and falls were evaluated every 3 months, for 9 months, from January to October 2018. Semistructured interviews (n = 20) were conducted with LTC teams to evaluate the implementation of OPUS-AP. Of 1054 residents, 78.3% had an MNCD diagnosis and 51.7% an antipsychotic prescription. The cohort included 464 residents with both MNCD and antipsychotic prescription. Antipsychotic deprescribing (cessation or dose decrease) was attempted in 220 of the 344 residents still admitted at 9 months. Complete cessation was observed in 116 of these residents (52.7%) and dose reduction in 72 (32.7%), for a total of 188 residents (85.5%; 95% confidence interval: 80.1%, 89.8%). A decrease in benzodiazepine prescriptions and improvements in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory scores were observed among residents who had their antipsychotics deprescribed. Caregivers and clinicians expressed satisfaction as a result of observing an improved quality of life among residents. Antipsychotic deprescribing was successful in a vast majority of LTC residents with MNCD without worsening of BPSD. Based on this success, phase 2 of OPUS-AP is now under way in 129 LTC centers in Québec. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of people who are comatose in Canadian complex continuing care (CCC) and long-term care (LTC) settings, and to make recommendations to promote comprehensive care planning for this population. Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of population data. All residents in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Saskatchewan, and the territory of Yukon with data available from the fiscal year 2015 (April 1, 2015, to March 31, 2016). Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were extracted from the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Data Set (MDS 2.0) and were reported using descriptive statistics. Of the LTC and CCC populations, 0.07% and 3.5% were identified as comatose, respectively. Overall, people who are comatose in both CCC or LTC settings are younger and have a longer length of stay than those who are not comatose. A higher proportion of people who are comatose experience active infections and irregular bowel elimination patterns, and those who are comatose were more likely to have a feeding tube and require oxygen therapy or suctioning than those who were not comatose. However, a lower proportion of people who were comatose had documented pain. In LTC, one-quarter of people who are comatose are expected to die within 6 months. Although the prevalence of people who are comatose in LTC and CCC settings is low, this population is complex and has significant care needs that require comprehensive assessment and care planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Poor food intake is known to lead to malnutrition in long-term care homes (LTCH), yet multilevel determinants of food intake are not fully understood, hampering development of interventions that can maintain the nutritional status of residents. This study measures energy and protein intake of LTCH residents, describes prevalence of diverse covariates, and the association of covariates with food intake. Design Multisite cross-sectional study. Setting Thirty-two nursing homes from 4 provinces in Canada. Participants From a sample of 639 residents (20 randomly selected per home), 628 with complete data were included in analyses. Measurements Three days of weighed food intake (main plate, estimated beverages and side dishes, snacks) were completed to measure energy and protein intake. Health records were reviewed for diagnoses, medications, and diet prescription. Mini-Nutritional Assessment-SF was used to determine nutritional risk. Oral health and dysphagia risk were assessed with standardized protocols. The Edinburgh-Feeding Questionnaire (Ed-FED) was used to identify eating challenges; mealtime interactions with staff were assessed with the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist. Mealtime observations recorded duration of meals and assistance received. Dining environments were assessed for physical features using the Dining Environment Audit Protocol, and the Mealtime Scan was used to record mealtime experience and ambiance. Staff completed the Person Directed Care questionnaire, and managers completed a survey describing features of the home and food services. Hierarchical multivariate regression determined predictors of energy and protein intake adjusted for other covariates. Results Average age of participants was 86.3 ± 7.8 years and 69% were female. Median energy intake was 1571.9 ± 411.93 kcal and protein 58.4 ± 18.02 g/d. There was a significant interaction between being prescribed a pureed/liquidized diet and eating challenges for energy intake. Age, number of eating challenges, pureed/liquidized diet, and sometimes requiring eating assistance were negatively associated with energy and protein intake. Being male, a higher Mini-Nutritional Assessment–Short Form score, often requiring eating assistance, and being on a dementia care unit were positively associated with energy and protein intake. Energy intake alone was negatively associated with homelikeness scores but positively associated with person-centered care practices, whereas protein intake was positively associated with more dietitian time. Conclusion This is the first study to consider resident, unit, staff, and home variables that are associated with food intake. Findings indicate that interventions focused on pureed food, restorative dining, eating assistance, and person-centered care practices may support improved food intake and should be the target for further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To assess the efficacy of interventions and environmental factors on increasing fluid intake or reducing dehydration risk in older people living in long-term care facilities. Design Systematic review of intervention and observational studies. Data Sources Thirteen electronic databases were searched from inception until September 2013 in all languages. References of included papers and reviews were checked. Eligibility Criteria Intervention and observational studies investigating modifiable factors to increase fluid intake and/or reduce dehydration risk in older people (≥65 years) living in long-term care facilities who could drink orally. Review Methods Two reviewers independently screened, selected, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias from included studies; narrative synthesis was performed. Results A total of 4328 titles and abstracts were identified, 325 full-text articles were obtained and 23 were included in the review. Nineteen intervention and 4 observational studies from 7 countries investigated factors at the resident, institutional, or policy level. Overall, the studies were at high risk of bias due to selection and attrition bias and lack of valid outcome measures of fluid intake and dehydration assessment. Reported findings from 6 of the 9 intervention studies investigating the effect of multicomponent strategies on fluid intake or dehydration described a positive effect. Components included greater choice and availability of beverages, increased staff awareness, and increased staff assistance with drinking and toileting. Implementation of the US Resident Assessment Instrument reduced dehydration prevalence from 3% to 1%, P = .01. Two smaller studies reported positive effects: one on fluid intake in 9 men with Alzheimer disease using high-contrast red cups, the other involved supplementing 13 mildly dehydrated residents with oral hydration solution over 5 days to reduce dehydration. Modifications to the dining environment, advice to residents, presentation of beverages, and mode of delivery (straw vs beaker; prethickened drinks vs those thickened at the bedside) were inconclusive. Two large observational studies with good internal validity investigated effects of ownership; in Canada, for-profit ownership was associated with increased hospital admissions for dehydration; no difference was seen in dehydration prevalence between US for-profit and not-for-profit homes, although chain facilities were associated with lower odds of dehydration. This US study did not suggest any effect of staffing levels on dehydration prevalence. Conclusions A wide range of interventions and exposures were identified, but the efficacy of many strategies remains unproven due to the high risk of bias present in many studies. Reducing dehydration prevalence in long-term care facilities is likely to require multiple strategies involving policymakers, management, and care staff, but these require further investigation using more robust study methodologies. The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012003100 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COVID-19 has had devastating effects on long-term care homes across much of the world, and especially within Canada, with more than 50% of the mortality from COVID-19 in 2020 in these homes. Understanding the way in which the virus spreads within these homes is critical to preventing further outbreaks. Retrospective chart review. Long-term care home residents and staff in Ontario, Canada. We conducted a longitudinal study of a large long-term care home COVID-19 outbreak in Ontario, Canada, using electronic medical records, public health records, staff assignments, and resident room locations to spatially map the outbreak through the facility. By analyzing the outbreak longitudinally, we were able to draw 3 important conclusions: (1) 84.5% had typical COVID-19 symptoms and only 15.5% of residents had asymptomatic infection; (2) there was a high attack rate of 85.8%, which appeared to be explained by a high degree of interconnectedness within the home exacerbated by staffing shortages; and (3) clustering of infections within multibedded rooms was common. Low rates of asymptomatic infection suggest that symptom-based screening in residents remains very important for detecting outbreaks, a high degree of interconnectedness explains the high attack rate, and there is a need for improved guidance for homes with multibedded rooms on optimizing resident room movement to mitigate spread of COVID-19 in long-term care homes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Family caregivers of persons with dementia rarely feel prepared for end of life although preparedness predicts outcomes in bereavement. The Caring Ahead: Preparing for End-of-Life With Dementia questionnaire was developed to measure family caregiver death preparedness. The aim of this study was to evaluate questionnaire psychometrics and refine the Caring Ahead questionnaire. A quantitative cross-sectional reliability study design was used to evaluate the questionnaire. Data were collected by mail from 134 English-speaking family caregivers of persons with dementia recruited from more than 50 congregate living facilities in Canada. Thirty-two participants completed a test-retest. Analysis of psychometrics included exploratory factor analysis, calculation of correlation with a single-global preparedness item, Cronbach alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) over time. A 4-factor model with 20 items emerged through exploratory factor analysis with principal factors extraction and promax rotation. The revised questionnaire includes 4 factor subscales: Actions (7 items), Dementia Knowledge (5 items), Communication (4 items), and Emotions and Support Needs (4 items). Evidence was demonstrated for concurrent validity (0.44-0.55, P <.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.7), and reliability (ICCs > 0.7). Lower levels of preparedness were reported for "knowing what the dying process with dementia may be like" and "discussing end-of-life care and preferences with health care providers." Preliminary evidence for validity and reliability of the refined 20-item Caring Ahead questionnaire suggests the questionnaire may be useful to clinicians and researchers seeking to assess caregivers' feelings of preparedness, identify specific areas for intervention, and evaluate the effectiveness of caregiver interventions. Additional testing is needed to evaluate predictive validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine if (1) number of staff or residents, when considering home-level factors and presence of family/volunteers, are associated with relationship-centered care practices at mealtimes in general and dementia care units in long-term care (LTC); and (2) the association between number of staff and relationship-centered care is moderated by number of residents and family/volunteers, profit status or chain affiliation. Secondary analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3) cross-sectional multisite study. Thirty-two Canadian LTC homes (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, and New Brunswick) and 639 residents were recruited. Eighty-two units were included, with 58 being general and 24 being dementia care units. Trained research coordinators completed the Mealtime Scan (MTS) for LTC at 4 to 6 mealtimes in each unit to determine number of staff, residents, and family or volunteers present. Relationship-centered care was assessed using the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist. The director of care or food services manager completed a home survey describing home sector and chain affiliation. Multivariable analyses were stratified by type of unit. In general care units, the number of residents was negatively (P =.009), and number of staff positively (P <.001) associated with relationship-centered care (F 9,48 = 5.48, P <.001). For dementia care units, the associations were nonsignificant (F 5,18 = 2.74, P =.05). The association between staffing and relationship-centered care was not moderated by any variables in either general or dementia care units. Number of staff in general care units may increase relationship-centered care at mealtimes in LTC. Number of residents or staff did not significantly affect relationship-centered care in dementia care units, suggesting that other factors such as additional training may better explain relationship-centered care in these units. Mandating minimum staffing and additional training at the federal level should be considered to ensure that staff have the capacity to deliver relationship-centered care at mealtimes, which is considered a best practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inappropriate antipsychotic prescribing is a key quality indicator by which clinical outcomes might be monitored and improved in long-term care (LTC), but limited evidence exists on the most effective strategies for reducing inappropriate antipsychotic use. The objective of the study was to evaluate a multicomponent approach to reduce inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotics in LTC. A prospective, stepped-wedge study design was used to evaluate the effect of the intervention. Interdisciplinary staff at 10 Canadian LTC facilities. The intervention consisted of an educational in-service, provision of evidence-based tools to assess and monitor neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in dementia, and monthly interprofessional team meetings. The primary outcome was the proportion of residents receiving an antipsychotic without a diagnosis of psychosis using a standardized antipsychotic quality indicator. The weighted mean change in inappropriate antipsychotic prescribing rate from baseline to 12-month follow-up was −4.6% [standard deviation (SD) = 2.8%, P <.0001], representing a 16.1% (SD = 17.0) relative reduction. After adjusting for site, the odds ratio for the inappropriate antipsychotic prescribing quality indicator at 12 months compared to baseline was 0.73 (95% confidence interval = 0.48-0.94; chi-square = 6.59; P =.01). There were no significant changes in related quality indicators, including falls, restraint use, or behavioral symptoms. This multicomponent intervention was effective in reducing inappropriate antipsychotic prescribing in LTC without adversely affecting other domains related to quality of care, and offers a practical means by which to improve the care of older adults with dementia in LTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined demographic, individual, and organizational context factors associated with nurses' job satisfaction in residential long-term care (LTC) settings. Job satisfaction has implications for staff turnover, staff health, and quality of care. A cross-sectional analysis of survey data collected in the Translating Research in Elder Care program. N = 756 nurses (registered nurses: n = 308; licensed practical nurses: n = 448) from 89 residential LTC settings in 3 Western Canadian provinces. We used a generalized estimating equation model to assess demographic, individual, and organizational context factors associated with job satisfaction. Job satisfaction was measured using the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Scale. Demographic, individual, and organizational context factors were associated with job satisfaction among nurses in residential LTC settings. At the demographic level, hours worked in 2 weeks (B = 0.002, P =.043) was associated with job satisfaction. At the individual level, emotional exhaustion-burnout (B = −0.063, P =.02) was associated with lower job satisfaction, while higher scores on empowerment (meaning) (B = 0.140, P =.015), work engagement (vigor) (B = 0.096, P =.01), and work engagement (dedication) (B = 0.129, P =.001) were associated with higher job satisfaction. With respect to organizational context, culture (B = 0.175, P <.001), organizational slack-space (eg, perceived availability and use of adequate space; B = 0.043, P =.040), and adequate orientation (B = 0.092, P <.001) were associated with higher job satisfaction. We identified previously unexamined modifiable organizational features (organizational slack-space and adequate orientation) as factors associated with LTC nurses' job satisfaction in the Canadian context. Our findings support future efforts to improve job satisfaction through improvements in organizational space and provision of adequate workplace orientation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To assess the effect of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) deprescribing guideline on PPI usage and PPI drug costs in one long-term care home in Ontario, Canada. Design Interrupted time-series analysis to compare monthly PPI usage and average monthly PPI cost per resident 9 months before guideline implementation to 12 months after. Setting One long-term care home in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Participants Long-term care residents prescribed a PPI over a 21-month period (n = 335). Intervention PPI deprescribing guideline and decision support tool used during quarterly medication reviews. Measurements (1) Total number of PPI prescriptions (PPI usage) and (2) average PPI drug cost per resident. We also measured the proportion of residents whose PPI was deprescribed in the preguideline period and postguideline period. Results The deprescribing guideline was associated with a decrease in PPI usage but the association was not statistically significant (−8.7 prescriptions, 95% confidence interval [CI] −22.0 to 4.6). The PPI guideline led to a significant decrease in average monthly PPI drug cost per resident over time (0.16 CAD reduction per month; 95% CI −0.29 to −0.03). In the 9 months before intervention, 57 (27.8%) of 205 eligible residents had their PPI deprescribed, and in the 12 months after intervention 134 (50.0%) of 268 eligible residents had their PPI deprescribed (difference in proportions of 22.2%; 95% CI 13.4–30.4). Discussion/conclusion The deprescribing guideline was associated with a decline PPI usage; however, this negative association was not statistically significant. PPI usage declined in the initial 6 months after guideline implementation but began to climb back to baseline after this, which may explain the lack of a significant reduction in PPI usage. This suggests that it was difficult to maintain PPI deprescribing efforts long-term. Although implementation of a PPI deprescribing guideline may lead to an initial reduction in PPI usage, and a significant reduction in the average cost of PPI prescriptions over time, it is imperative to explore ways to sustain deprescribing guideline use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]